Mean Aggregator Is More Robust Than Robust Aggregators Under Label Poisoning Attacks

Overview

• This paper investigates the robustness of different aggregators, such as the mean aggregator and robust aggregators, under label poisoning attacks in machine learning models.
• The researchers find that the mean aggregator, a simple and widely-used approach, is more robust to label poisoning attacks compared to more complex robust aggregators.
• This challenges the conventional wisdom that robust aggregators are more effective at mitigating the impact of adversarial attacks on machine learning models.

Plain English Explanation

In machine learning, models are often trained on data provided by multiple sources or participants. This distributed training process is known as federated learning. However, some of these participants may try to sabotage the model by providing malicious or "poisoned" data, a type of attack called label poisoning.

To combat these attacks, researchers have developed robust aggregators, which are designed to be more resistant to the influence of malicious data. The mean aggregator, a simple technique that averages the contributions from all participants, is often considered less robust.

Surprisingly, this paper finds that the mean aggregator is actually more effective at withstanding label poisoning attacks compared to these more complex robust aggregators. This contradicts the prevailing belief that robust aggregators are better at mitigating the impact of adversarial attacks, as discussed in research on building robust toxicity predictors and evaluating the robustness of event identification models.

The researchers attribute this finding to the ability of the mean aggregator to "average out" the impact of malicious data, whereas robust aggregators may be more susceptible to being "fooled" by the adversarial attacks. This suggests that simplicity can sometimes be a strength when it comes to building resilient machine learning models, even in the face of aggressive network pruning or other adversarial techniques.

Technical Explanation

The paper formulates the label poisoning attack problem in a federated learning setting, where the goal of the attacker is to manipulate the labels of a subset of the training data to degrade the performance of the global model.

The researchers compare the robustness of the mean aggregator, which simply averages the model updates from all participants, to that of several robust aggregators, such as the Krum and Trimmed Mean aggregators. These robust aggregators aim to identify and discard malicious updates, thereby improving the resilience of the global model.

Through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets, the paper demonstrates that the mean aggregator surprisingly outperforms the robust aggregators in the presence of label poisoning attacks. The researchers attribute this to the ability of the mean aggregator to "average out" the impact of malicious updates, whereas the robust aggregators may be more susceptible to being "fooled" by the adversarial attacks.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of federated learning and the robustness of different aggregation techniques under adversarial attacks. However, there are a few limitations and areas for further research:

1. The paper focuses solely on label poisoning attacks and does not consider other types of adversarial attacks, such as data poisoning or model-level attacks. It would be important to evaluate the robustness of the mean aggregator against a broader range of adversarial threats.

2. The experiments are conducted on a limited set of datasets and attack scenarios. Extending the analysis to a wider range of real-world applications and attack settings would strengthen the generalizability of the findings.

3. The paper does not explore the potential reasons why robust aggregators may be more susceptible to label poisoning attacks compared to the mean aggregator. Further investigation into the underlying mechanisms and potential weaknesses of these robust techniques would be valuable.

4. While the paper challenges the conventional wisdom on the superiority of robust aggregators, it does not provide a comprehensive assessment of the trade-offs and considerations in choosing between different aggregation strategies. This could be an area for future research.

Conclusion

This paper presents a surprising finding that challenges the prevailing belief in the machine learning community. It demonstrates that the simple mean aggregator can be more robust to label poisoning attacks compared to more complex robust aggregators, which are designed specifically to mitigate the impact of adversarial data.

This work suggests that simplicity can sometimes be a strength in building resilient machine learning models, even in the face of sophisticated adversarial attacks. The findings have important implications for the design and deployment of federated learning systems, where the choice of aggregation strategy can significantly impact the model's robustness and performance.

The paper's insights encourage further research into the nuances of adversarial robustness and the development of more comprehensive strategies for building secure and reliable machine learning models.