Measuring Transparency in Intelligent Robots

Read original: arXiv:2408.16865 - Published 9/2/2024 by Georgios Angelopoulos, Dimitri Lacroix, Ricarda Wullenkord, Alessandra Rossi, Silvia Rossi, Friederike Eyssel
Total Score

0

Measuring Transparency in Intelligent Robots

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper examines how to measure transparency in intelligent robots.
  • The authors propose a framework for quantifying different aspects of transparency in robot systems.
  • They conduct experiments to validate their transparency measurement approach on a surgical robot.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers were interested in finding ways to measure how transparent or understandable an intelligent robot system is. Transparency in AI is an important concept, as it allows users to better comprehend how a robot makes decisions and understand its behavior.

To do this, the team developed a framework with different metrics that can quantify various facets of transparency, such as how much information the robot shares about its internal decision-making process, whether its actions are predictable, and if the robot's goals and objectives are clear. They then tested this framework by applying it to a surgical robot, running experiments to see how well the transparency metrics captured the robot's level of openness and explainability.

The results suggest this approach can provide a reliable way to measure and compare the transparency of different intelligent robot systems. This could be valuable for designing more transparent and trustworthy AI-powered robots that are able to effectively collaborate with and be understood by human users.

Technical Explanation

The researchers proposed a framework for quantifying transparency in intelligent robot systems. This framework includes several metrics that capture different aspects of transparency:

  • Interpretability: The degree to which the robot's internal decision-making process can be understood by users.
  • Predictability: How well the robot's future actions can be anticipated based on its past behavior.
  • Goal Clarity: How clearly the robot communicates its objectives and intentions to users.

To validate this framework, the authors conducted experiments using a surgical robot system. They had human participants interact with the robot and then assessed the robot's transparency along these dimensions using questionnaires and other measurements.

The results showed that the transparency metrics were able to effectively differentiate between robot behaviors that were more or less transparent. For example, the robot's actions were rated as more predictable and its goals more clear when it provided additional explanatory information to users. This demonstrates the potential of this approach for quantifying and comparing the transparency of various intelligent robot systems.

Critical Analysis

The proposed transparency measurement framework provides a valuable starting point for objectively evaluating this important property of intelligent robots. However, the authors acknowledge that it may not capture all possible facets of transparency, and additional research is needed to further refine and validate the metrics.

For instance, the framework currently focuses on transparency from the user's perspective, but there may also be value in measuring the robot's own understanding of its internal processes and decision-making. Additionally, the experiments were conducted in a relatively constrained surgical robot scenario, so more research is required to understand how well the framework generalizes to other types of intelligent robot systems and real-world applications.

It would also be insightful to explore how the different transparency dimensions inter-relate and potentially tradeoff against each other. For example, providing more interpretable information about the robot's decision-making may come at the cost of reduced predictability or goal clarity.

Overall, this work represents an important step forward in developing methods for assessing AI transparency, which is crucial for building [trustworthy and explainable AI systems that can effectively collaborate with humans.

Conclusion

This paper presents a framework for quantifying different aspects of transparency in intelligent robot systems, including interpretability, predictability, and goal clarity. The authors validated this approach through experiments with a surgical robot, demonstrating its potential to provide a reliable way to assess and compare the transparency of various AI-powered robots.

While further research is needed to refine and extend this framework, this work represents an important contribution toward the [development of more transparent and human-aware robots that can build trust and effectively collaborate with human users. Measuring and optimizing transparency will be a key consideration as intelligent robots become more prevalent in our daily lives.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Measuring Transparency in Intelligent Robots
Total Score

0

Measuring Transparency in Intelligent Robots

Georgios Angelopoulos, Dimitri Lacroix, Ricarda Wullenkord, Alessandra Rossi, Silvia Rossi, Friederike Eyssel

As robots become increasingly integrated into our daily lives, the need to make them transparent has never been more critical. Yet, despite its importance in human-robot interaction, a standardized measure of robot transparency has been missing until now. This paper addresses this gap by presenting the first comprehensive scale to measure perceived transparency in robotic systems, available in English, German, and Italian languages. Our approach conceptualizes transparency as a multidimensional construct, encompassing explainability, legibility, predictability, and meta-understanding. The proposed scale was a product of a rigorous three-stage process involving 1,223 participants. Firstly, we generated the items of our scale, secondly, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis, and thirdly, a confirmatory factor analysis served to validate the factor structure of the newly developed TOROS scale. The final scale encompasses 26 items and comprises three factors: Illegibility, Explainability, and Predictability. TOROS demonstrates high cross-linguistic reliability, inter-factor correlation, model fit, internal consistency, and convergent validity across the three cross-national samples. This empirically validated tool enables the assessment of robot transparency and contributes to the theoretical understanding of this complex construct. By offering a standardized measure, we facilitate consistent and comparable research in human-robot interaction in which TOROS can serve as a benchmark.

Read more

9/2/2024

📈

Total Score

0

A transparency-based action model implemented in a robotic physical trainer for improved HRI

Aharony Naama, Krakovski Maya, Edan Yael

Transparency is an important aspect of human-robot interaction (HRI), as it can improve system trust and usability leading to improved communication and performance. However, most transparency models focus only on the amount of information given to users. In this paper, we propose a bidirectional transparency model, termed a transparency-based action (TBA) model, which in addition to providing transparency information (robot-to-human), allows the robot to take actions based on transparency information received from the human (robot-of-human and human-to-robot). We implemented a three-level (High, Medium and Low) TBA model on a robotic system trainer in two pilot studies (with students as participants) to examine its impact on acceptance and HRI. Based on the pilot studies results, the Medium TBA level was not included in the main experiment, which was conducted with older adults (aged 75-85). In that experiment, two TBA levels were compared: Low (basic information including only robot-to-human transparency) and High (including additional information relating to predicted outcomes with robot-of-human and human-to-robot transparency). The results revealed a significant difference between the two TBA levels of the model in terms of perceived usefulness, ease of use, and attitude. The High TBA level resulted in improved user acceptance and was preferred by the users.

Read more

6/18/2024

Explainability for Transparent Conversational Information-Seeking
Total Score

0

Explainability for Transparent Conversational Information-Seeking

Weronika {L}ajewska, Damiano Spina, Johanne Trippas, Krisztian Balog

The increasing reliance on digital information necessitates advancements in conversational search systems, particularly in terms of information transparency. While prior research in conversational information-seeking has concentrated on improving retrieval techniques, the challenge remains in generating responses useful from a user perspective. This study explores different methods of explaining the responses, hypothesizing that transparency about the source of the information, system confidence, and limitations can enhance users' ability to objectively assess the response. By exploring transparency across explanation type, quality, and presentation mode, this research aims to bridge the gap between system-generated responses and responses verifiable by the user. We design a user study to answer questions concerning the impact of (1) the quality of explanations enhancing the response on its usefulness and (2) ways of presenting explanations to users. The analysis of the collected data reveals lower user ratings for noisy explanations, although these scores seem insensitive to the quality of the response. Inconclusive results on the explanations presentation format suggest that it may not be a critical factor in this setting.

Read more

5/7/2024

Toward RAPS: the Robot Autonomy Perception Scale
Total Score

0

Toward RAPS: the Robot Autonomy Perception Scale

Rafael Sousa Silva, Cailyn Smith, Lara Bezerra, Tom Williams

Human-robot interactions can change significantly depending on how autonomous humans perceive a robot to be. Yet, while previous work in the HRI community measured perceptions of human autonomy, there is little work on measuring perceptions of robot autonomy. In this paper, we present our progress toward the creation of the Robot Autonomy Perception Scale (RAPS): a theoretically motivated scale for measuring human perceptions of robot autonomy. We formulated a set of fifteen Likert scale items that are based on the definition of autonomy from Beer et al.'s work, which identifies five key autonomy components: ability to sense, ability to plan, ability to act, ability to act with an intent towards some goal, and an ability to do so without external control. We applied RAPS to an experimental context in which a robot communicated with a human teammate through different levels of Performative Autonomy (PA): an autonomy-driven strategy in which robots may perform a lower level of autonomy than they are truly capable of to increase human situational awareness. Our results present preliminary validation for RAPS by demonstrating its sensitivity to PA and motivate the further validation of RAPS.

Read more

7/17/2024