A transparency-based action model implemented in a robotic physical trainer for improved HRI

Overview

• This paper proposes a new model for bidirectional transparency in human-robot interaction (HRI)
• The model, called Transparency-Based Action (TBA), allows for both the robot to provide information to the user (robot-to-human) and the user to provide information to the robot (human-to-robot)
• The authors implemented a three-level TBA model (High, Medium, Low) and tested it in two pilot studies with students, then a main experiment with older adults (ages 75-85)
• The results showed that the High TBA level, which included more detailed information and transparency in both directions, led to better user acceptance and was preferred by participants

Plain English Explanation

When humans interact with robots, it's important that the robots are transparent about what they're doing and why. This can help build trust and make the interaction more effective. Most existing models for robot transparency only focus on the information the robot provides to the human.

In this paper, the researchers propose a new bidirectional transparency model called Transparency-Based Action (TBA). In addition to the robot providing information to the human (robot-to-human), the TBA model also allows the human to provide information to the robot (human-to-robot). This two-way exchange of information can further improve the interaction.

The researchers tested different levels of the TBA model - High, Medium, and Low - in a series of studies. They found that the High TBA level, which included more detailed information and transparency in both directions, led to better user acceptance and was preferred by the participants. This suggests that a more comprehensive, bidirectional approach to transparency can enhance human-robot interactions.

Technical Explanation

The researchers implemented a three-level Transparency-Based Action (TBA) model on a robotic system trainer. The TBA model consists of two main components:

1. Robot-to-Human Transparency: This provides information about the robot's internal state, reasoning, and predicted actions to the human user.
2. Human-to-Robot Transparency: This allows the human user to provide information to the robot, which the robot can then use to adjust its behavior.

The three levels of the TBA model were:

1. Low TBA: Provided basic information including only robot-to-human transparency.
2. Medium TBA: Included additional information related to predicted outcomes with some human-to-robot transparency.
3. High TBA: Provided the most detailed information, with a full implementation of both robot-to-human and human-to-robot transparency.

The researchers conducted two pilot studies with student participants to examine the impact of the TBA model on acceptance and HRI. Based on the results, they decided to exclude the Medium TBA level and focus on the Low and High levels for the main experiment with older adult participants (ages 75-85).

The results of the main experiment revealed a significant difference between the Low and High TBA levels in terms of perceived usefulness, ease of use, and user attitude. The High TBA level resulted in improved user acceptance and was preferred by the participants.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their study. First, the experiment was conducted in a controlled laboratory setting, which may not fully represent real-world HRI scenarios. Additionally, the participant pool was limited to older adults, and the results may not generalize to other age groups.

The paper also does not delve into the specific design of the human-to-robot transparency component of the TBA model. It would be valuable to understand how the researchers implemented this bidirectional information exchange and the types of information the users were able to provide to the robot.

Further research is needed to explore the long-term effects of the TBA model, as the current study only evaluated immediate user perceptions. Longitudinal studies could provide insights into how the model impacts the development of trust and rapport between humans and robots over time.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential challenges or concerns with the implementation of a bidirectional transparency model, such as privacy implications or the risk of information overload for users. These are important considerations that should be explored in future research.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel Transparency-Based Action (TBA) model that extends the concept of transparency in human-robot interaction to be bidirectional. The researchers found that a high level of transparency, including both robot-to-human and human-to-robot information exchange, led to improved user acceptance and was preferred by older adult participants.

These findings suggest that a more comprehensive approach to transparency, where the robot not only provides information to the human but also receives and responds to information from the human, can enhance the overall user experience and trust in the robot. As robots become more integrated into our daily lives, developing transparent and interactive frameworks like the TBA model will be crucial for ensuring effective and trustworthy human-robot collaboration.