MediTab: Scaling Medical Tabular Data Predictors via Data Consolidation, Enrichment, and Refinement
2305.12081
0
0
📊
Abstract
Tabular data prediction has been employed in medical applications such as patient health risk prediction. However, existing methods usually revolve around the algorithm design while overlooking the significance of data engineering. Medical tabular datasets frequently exhibit significant heterogeneity across different sources, with limited sample sizes per source. As such, previous predictors are often trained on manually curated small datasets that struggle to generalize across different tabular datasets during inference. This paper proposes to scale medical tabular data predictors (MediTab) to various tabular inputs with varying features. The method uses a data engine that leverages large language models (LLMs) to consolidate tabular samples to overcome the barrier across tables with distinct schema. It also aligns out-domain data with the target task using a learn, annotate, and refinement pipeline. The expanded training data then enables the pre-trained MediTab to infer for arbitrary tabular input in the domain without fine-tuning, resulting in significant improvements over supervised baselines: it reaches an average ranking of 1.57 and 1.00 on 7 patient outcome prediction datasets and 3 trial outcome prediction datasets, respectively. In addition, MediTab exhibits impressive zero-shot performances: it outperforms supervised XGBoost models by 8.9% and 17.2% on average in two prediction tasks, respectively.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a method called MediTab to improve medical tabular data prediction by leveraging large language models (LLMs).
- Medical tabular datasets often have significant heterogeneity and limited sample sizes, making it difficult for existing predictors to generalize.
- MediTab uses a data engine that consolidates tabular samples and aligns out-of-domain data with the target task to expand the training data.
- This enables MediTab to infer on arbitrary tabular inputs without fine-tuning, leading to significant improvements over supervised baselines.
Plain English Explanation
Medical professionals often use tabular data prediction to predict patient health risks. However, existing methods tend to focus more on algorithm design and less on the importance of preparing the data. Medical tabular datasets can be quite varied, with samples from different sources and limited amounts of data for each. As a result, previous predictors trained on small, manually curated datasets often struggle to work well on new tabular datasets.
This paper introduces a method called MediTab that aims to address this challenge. MediTab uses a data engine that leverages large language models (LLMs) to consolidate the tabular samples and align data from outside the target domain with the specific prediction task. This expanded training data allows MediTab to make accurate predictions on new tabular inputs without having to be retrained or fine-tuned.
The results show that MediTab significantly outperforms traditional supervised models, reaching top rankings on several patient and clinical trial outcome prediction tasks. It even demonstrates impressive "zero-shot" performance, where it can outperform supervised models without any fine-tuning on the target datasets.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this paper is the use of a data engine that leverages large language models (LLMs) to address the challenges posed by heterogeneous medical tabular datasets with limited samples. The data engine has three main components:
-
Tabular Sample Consolidation: The engine uses LLMs to consolidate tabular samples from different sources into a unified representation, overcoming the barrier of distinct schema across tables.
-
Out-Domain Data Alignment: The engine aligns out-of-domain tabular data with the target prediction task using a learn, annotate, and refinement pipeline. This allows the model to leverage a broader range of data to improve performance.
-
Pre-trained MediTab Inference: The expanded training data enables the pre-trained MediTab model to make accurate predictions on arbitrary tabular inputs without any fine-tuning, leading to significant improvements over supervised baselines.
The experiments demonstrate that MediTab achieves an average ranking of 1.57 and 1.00 on 7 patient outcome prediction datasets and 3 trial outcome prediction datasets, respectively. It also exhibits impressive zero-shot performance, outperforming supervised XGBoost models by 8.9% and 17.2% on average in two prediction tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the authors note that while MediTab shows promising results, the underlying LLM technology is still evolving, and the performance may be dependent on future advancements in this area. Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the computational and memory requirements of the data engine, which could be an important consideration for real-world deployment.
Another potential concern is the reliance on out-of-domain data alignment, which may not always be feasible or reliable, especially in sensitive domains like healthcare. The authors mention the need for careful curation and validation of such data, but further research may be needed to understand the limitations and potential biases introduced by this approach.
Finally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive comparison with other state-of-the-art tabular data prediction methods, such as TabSQLify, which could offer additional insights into the relative strengths and weaknesses of the MediTab approach.
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising approach, called MediTab, to improve medical tabular data prediction by leveraging large language models and a data engine that can consolidate heterogeneous datasets and align out-of-domain data. The results demonstrate significant performance gains over traditional supervised models, even in a zero-shot setting, suggesting that MediTab could be a valuable tool for medical professionals and researchers working with diverse tabular datasets.
However, the paper also highlights the need for further research to address the limitations of the underlying LLM technology and the potential challenges in scaling the data alignment approach. As the field of tabular data prediction continues to evolve, the insights and innovations presented in this paper could pave the way for more robust and generalizable predictive models in the medical domain and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Large Scale Transfer Learning for Tabular Data via Language Modeling
Josh Gardner, Juan C. Perdomo, Ludwig Schmidt
0
0
Tabular data -- structured, heterogeneous, spreadsheet-style data with rows and columns -- is widely used in practice across many domains. However, while recent foundation models have reduced the need for developing task-specific datasets and predictors in domains such as language modeling and computer vision, this transfer learning paradigm has not had similar impact in the tabular domain. In this work, we seek to narrow this gap and present TabuLa-8B, a language model for tabular prediction. We define a process for extracting a large, high-quality training dataset from the TabLib corpus, proposing methods for tabular data filtering and quality control. Using the resulting dataset, which comprises over 1.6B rows from 3.1M unique tables, we fine-tune a Llama 3-8B large language model (LLM) for tabular data prediction (classification and binned regression) using a novel packing and attention scheme for tabular prediction. Through evaluation across a test suite of 329 datasets, we find that TabuLa-8B has zero-shot accuracy on unseen tables that is over 15 percentage points (pp) higher than random guessing, a feat that is not possible with existing state-of-the-art tabular prediction models (e.g. XGBoost, TabPFN). In the few-shot setting (1-32 shots), without any fine-tuning on the target datasets, TabuLa-8B is 5-15 pp more accurate than XGBoost and TabPFN models that are explicitly trained on equal, or even up to 16x more data. We release our model, code, and data along with the publication of this paper.
6/19/2024
💬
Unleashing the Potential of Large Language Models for Predictive Tabular Tasks in Data Science
Yazheng Yang, Yuqi Wang, Sankalok Sen, Lei Li, Qi Liu
0
0
In the domain of data science, the predictive tasks of classification, regression, and imputation of missing values are commonly encountered challenges associated with tabular data. This research endeavors to apply Large Language Models (LLMs) towards addressing these predictive tasks. Despite their proficiency in comprehending natural language, LLMs fall short in dealing with structured tabular data. This limitation stems from their lacking exposure to the intricacies of tabular data during their foundational training. Our research aims to mitigate this gap by compiling a comprehensive corpus of tables annotated with instructions and executing large-scale training of Llama-2 on this enriched dataset. Furthermore, we investigate the practical application of applying the trained model to zero-shot prediction, few-shot prediction, and in-context learning scenarios. Through extensive experiments, our methodology has shown significant improvements over existing benchmarks. These advancements highlight the efficacy of tailoring LLM training to solve table-related problems in data science, thereby establishing a new benchmark in the utilization of LLMs for enhancing tabular intelligence.
4/9/2024
Large Language Models(LLMs) on Tabular Data: Prediction, Generation, and Understanding -- A Survey
Xi Fang, Weijie Xu, Fiona Anting Tan, Jiani Zhang, Ziqing Hu, Yanjun Qi, Scott Nickleach, Diego Socolinsky, Srinivasan Sengamedu, Christos Faloutsos
0
0
Recent breakthroughs in large language modeling have facilitated rigorous exploration of their application in diverse tasks related to tabular data modeling, such as prediction, tabular data synthesis, question answering, and table understanding. Each task presents unique challenges and opportunities. However, there is currently a lack of comprehensive review that summarizes and compares the key techniques, metrics, datasets, models, and optimization approaches in this research domain. This survey aims to address this gap by consolidating recent progress in these areas, offering a thorough survey and taxonomy of the datasets, metrics, and methodologies utilized. It identifies strengths, limitations, unexplored territories, and gaps in the existing literature, while providing some insights for future research directions in this vital and rapidly evolving field. It also provides relevant code and datasets references. Through this comprehensive review, we hope to provide interested readers with pertinent references and insightful perspectives, empowering them with the necessary tools and knowledge to effectively navigate and address the prevailing challenges in the field.
6/26/2024
Automated Model Selection for Tabular Data
Avinash Amballa, Gayathri Akkinapalli, Manas Madine, Naga Pavana Priya Yarrabolu, Przemyslaw A. Grabowicz
0
0
Structured data in the form of tabular datasets contain features that are distinct and discrete, with varying individual and relative importances to the target. Combinations of one or more features may be more predictive and meaningful than simple individual feature contributions. R's mixed effect linear models library allows users to provide such interactive feature combinations in the model design. However, given many features and possible interactions to select from, model selection becomes an exponentially difficult task. We aim to automate the model selection process for predictions on tabular datasets incorporating feature interactions while keeping computational costs small. The framework includes two distinct approaches for feature selection: a Priority-based Random Grid Search and a Greedy Search method. The Priority-based approach efficiently explores feature combinations using prior probabilities to guide the search. The Greedy method builds the solution iteratively by adding or removing features based on their impact. Experiments on synthetic demonstrate the ability to effectively capture predictive feature combinations.
5/30/2024