Merge, Ensemble, and Cooperate! A Survey on Collaborative Strategies in the Era of Large Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2407.06089 - Published 7/9/2024 by Jinliang Lu, Ziliang Pang, Min Xiao, Yaochen Zhu, Rui Xia, Jiajun Zhang
Total Score

0

Merge, Ensemble, and Cooperate! A Survey on Collaborative Strategies in the Era of Large Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper surveys collaborative strategies in the era of large language models (LLMs), exploring techniques like merging, ensembling, and cooperation.
  • It examines how these approaches can be used to enhance the capabilities and performance of LLMs.
  • The paper covers a range of topics, including ensemble learning for heterogeneous LLMs, collaboration mechanisms for LLM agents, and efficient large language model design.
  • It also discusses multiagent collaboration for adversarial attacks on LLMs and the potential for LLMs to serve as general-purpose agents.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores different ways that large language models (LLMs) can work together to become even more capable. LLMs are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text, but they often have limitations or biases. The researchers investigate strategies like merging multiple LLMs, using them in ensemble (or team) configurations, and having them cooperate with each other.

By combining LLMs in these collaborative ways, the researchers believe their capabilities can be enhanced. For example, merging heterogeneous LLMs could allow them to draw on each other's strengths, while cooperation between LLM agents could enable them to tackle more complex problems together. The paper also looks at how to design efficient LLM architectures that can support these collaborative strategies.

Additionally, the researchers explore more adversarial use cases, such as how multiple LLMs could work together to attack each other. They also consider the potential for LLMs to serve as general-purpose agents that can assist humans in a wide variety of tasks.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a comprehensive survey of collaborative strategies for large language models (LLMs), including techniques like merging, ensembling, and cooperation. It examines how these approaches can be leveraged to enhance the capabilities and performance of LLMs.

One key area covered is ensemble learning for heterogeneous LLMs. The researchers explore methods for combining multiple LLMs with different architectures, training data, and specializations to create more robust and well-rounded systems.

The paper also delves into collaboration mechanisms for LLM agents, drawing insights from social psychology to understand how LLMs can work together effectively. This includes investigating communication protocols, task coordination, and trust building between LLM agents.

Additionally, the survey covers efficient large language model design, examining techniques for developing LLM architectures that can support collaborative strategies while maintaining high performance and resource efficiency.

The researchers also explore more adversarial use cases, such as multiagent collaboration for attacking LLMs. This includes studying how multiple LLMs could work together to identify and exploit vulnerabilities in other LLM systems.

Finally, the paper considers the potential for LLMs to serve as general-purpose agents, capable of assisting humans with a wide range of tasks by leveraging their collaborative capabilities.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and insightful survey of collaborative strategies for large language models (LLMs), but it also acknowledges several caveats and areas for further research.

One key limitation is the current state of collaboration mechanisms for LLM agents. While the paper explores promising approaches drawn from social psychology, the researchers note that much work is still needed to develop robust and scalable collaboration protocols for LLMs. Ensuring effective communication, trust, and task coordination between LLM agents remains a significant challenge.

Additionally, the researchers highlight the potential risks of adversarial attacks on LLMs, particularly when multiple LLMs work together to identify and exploit vulnerabilities. While this area of research is important, the paper cautions that such techniques could also be misused for malicious purposes, and further safeguards may be necessary.

Another area for further research is the long-term implications of LLMs serving as general-purpose agents. While the paper suggests this as a promising direction, the researchers acknowledge that there are still many open questions regarding the ethical and societal impacts of such systems, including issues of transparency, accountability, and the displacement of human labor.

Overall, the paper provides a valuable and thought-provoking exploration of collaborative strategies for LLMs, but it also encourages readers to think critically about the potential benefits, risks, and unintended consequences of these emerging technologies.

Conclusion

This comprehensive survey paper examines the exciting potential of collaborative strategies for large language models (LLMs), including techniques like merging, ensembling, and cooperation. By leveraging these approaches, the researchers believe LLMs can enhance their capabilities and performance, unlocking new possibilities for AI-powered applications and assistants.

The paper covers a wide range of topics, from ensemble learning for heterogeneous LLMs to efficient LLM architecture design and multiagent collaboration for adversarial attacks. It also explores the intriguing idea of LLMs serving as general-purpose agents that can assist humans in a wide variety of tasks.

While the paper offers a compelling vision for the future of collaborative LLMs, it also acknowledges the significant challenges and potential risks that must be addressed. Developing robust collaboration mechanisms, ensuring safety and security, and understanding the broader societal implications will all be crucial areas of focus for researchers and policymakers going forward.

Overall, this survey highlights the exciting possibilities and important considerations surrounding the collaborative use of large language models, making it a valuable resource for anyone interested in the cutting edge of AI research and development.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Merge, Ensemble, and Cooperate! A Survey on Collaborative Strategies in the Era of Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Merge, Ensemble, and Cooperate! A Survey on Collaborative Strategies in the Era of Large Language Models

Jinliang Lu, Ziliang Pang, Min Xiao, Yaochen Zhu, Rui Xia, Jiajun Zhang

The remarkable success of Large Language Models (LLMs) has ushered natural language processing (NLP) research into a new era. Despite their diverse capabilities, LLMs trained on different corpora exhibit varying strengths and weaknesses, leading to challenges in maximizing their overall efficiency and versatility. To address these challenges, recent studies have explored collaborative strategies for LLMs. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of this emerging research area, highlighting the motivation behind such collaborations. Specifically, we categorize collaborative strategies into three primary approaches: Merging, Ensemble, and Cooperation. Merging involves integrating multiple LLMs in the parameter space. Ensemble combines the outputs of various LLMs. Cooperation} leverages different LLMs to allow full play to their diverse capabilities for specific tasks. We provide in-depth introductions to these methods from different perspectives and discuss their potential applications. Additionally, we outline future research directions, hoping this work will catalyze further studies on LLM collaborations and paving the way for advanced NLP applications.

Read more

7/9/2024

Coalitions of Large Language Models Increase the Robustness of AI Agents
Total Score

0

Coalitions of Large Language Models Increase the Robustness of AI Agents

Prattyush Mangal, Carol Mak, Theo Kanakis, Timothy Donovan, Dave Braines, Edward Pyzer-Knapp

The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) have fundamentally altered the way we interact with digital systems and have led to the pursuit of LLM powered AI agents to assist in daily workflows. LLMs, whilst powerful and capable of demonstrating some emergent properties, are not logical reasoners and often struggle to perform well at all sub-tasks carried out by an AI agent to plan and execute a workflow. While existing studies tackle this lack of proficiency by generalised pretraining at a huge scale or by specialised fine-tuning for tool use, we assess if a system comprising of a coalition of pretrained LLMs, each exhibiting specialised performance at individual sub-tasks, can match the performance of single model agents. The coalition of models approach showcases its potential for building robustness and reducing the operational costs of these AI agents by leveraging traits exhibited by specific models. Our findings demonstrate that fine-tuning can be mitigated by considering a coalition of pretrained models and believe that this approach can be applied to other non-agentic systems which utilise LLMs.

Read more

8/6/2024

Enabling Ensemble Learning for Heterogeneous Large Language Models with Deep Parallel Collaboration
Total Score

0

Enabling Ensemble Learning for Heterogeneous Large Language Models with Deep Parallel Collaboration

Yichong Huang, Xiaocheng Feng, Baohang Li, Yang Xiang, Hui Wang, Bing Qin, Ting Liu

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit complementary strengths in various tasks, motivating the research of LLM ensembling. However, existing work focuses on training an extra reward model or fusion model to select or combine all candidate answers, posing a great challenge to the generalization on unseen data distributions. Besides, prior methods use textual responses as communication media, ignoring the valuable information in the internal representations. In this work, we propose a training-free ensemble framework DeePEn, fusing the informative probability distributions yielded by different LLMs at each decoding step. Unfortunately, the vocabulary discrepancy between heterogeneous LLMs directly makes averaging the distributions unfeasible due to the token misalignment. To address this challenge, DeePEn maps the probability distribution of each model from its own probability space to a universal relative space based on the relative representation theory, and performs aggregation. Next, we devise a search-based inverse transformation to transform the aggregated result back to the probability space of one of the ensembling LLMs (main model), in order to determine the next token. We conduct extensive experiments on ensembles of different number of LLMs, ensembles of LLMs with different architectures, and ensembles between the LLM and the specialist model. Experimental results show that (i) DeePEn achieves consistent improvements across six benchmarks covering subject examination, reasoning, and knowledge, (ii) a well-performing specialist model can benefit from a less effective LLM through distribution fusion, and (iii) DeePEn has complementary strengths with other ensemble methods such as voting.

Read more

5/31/2024

Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View
Total Score

0

Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View

Jintian Zhang, Xin Xu, Ningyu Zhang, Ruibo Liu, Bryan Hooi, Shumin Deng

As Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems are increasingly employed in intricate social environments, a pressing query emerges: Can these NLP systems mirror human-esque collaborative intelligence, in a multi-agent society consisting of multiple large language models (LLMs)? This paper probes the collaboration mechanisms among contemporary NLP systems by melding practical experiments with theoretical insights. We fabricate four unique `societies' comprised of LLM agents, where each agent is characterized by a specific `trait' (easy-going or overconfident) and engages in collaboration with a distinct `thinking pattern' (debate or reflection). Through evaluating these multi-agent societies on three benchmark datasets, we discern that certain collaborative strategies not only outshine previous top-tier approaches, but also optimize efficiency (using fewer API tokens). Moreover, our results further illustrate that LLM agents manifest human-like social behaviors, such as conformity and consensus reaching, mirroring foundational social psychology theories. In conclusion, we integrate insights from social psychology to contextualize the collaboration of LLM agents, inspiring further investigations into the collaboration mechanism for LLMs. We commit to sharing our code and datasetsfootnote{url{https://github.com/zjunlp/MachineSoM}.}, hoping to catalyze further research in this promising avenue.

Read more

5/28/2024