MetaAligner: Towards Generalizable Multi-Objective Alignment of Language Models
2403.17141
0
0
Abstract
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) aim to tackle heterogeneous human expectations and values via multi-objective preference alignment. However, existing methods are parameter-adherent to the policy model, leading to two key limitations: (1) the high-cost repetition of their alignment algorithms for each new target model; (2) they cannot expand to unseen objectives due to their static alignment objectives. In this work, we propose Meta-Objective Aligner (MetaAligner), a model that performs conditional weak-to-strong correction for weak responses to approach strong responses. MetaAligner is the first policy-agnostic and generalizable method for multi-objective preference alignment, which enables plug-and-play alignment by decoupling parameter updates from the policy models and facilitates zero-shot preference alignment for unseen objectives via in-context learning. Experimental results show that MetaAligner achieves significant and balanced improvements in multi-objective alignments on 10 state-of-the-art policy models, and outperforms previous alignment methods with down to 15.71x less GPU training hours. The model also effectively aligns unseen objectives, marking the first step towards generalizable multi-objective preference alignment.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces MetaAligner, a method for aligning language models to multiple objectives in a generalizable way.
- MetaAligner uses a "conditional weak-to-strong correction" approach to improve the performance of language models on target tasks.
- The method aims to address the challenge of aligning language models to diverse objectives while maintaining strong performance on the original task.
Plain English Explanation
Language models like GPT-3 are powerful tools that can be used for a wide range of tasks, from text generation to question answering. However, these models are typically trained on a single objective, such as predicting the next word in a sentence. This can make it challenging to adapt the model to perform well on other tasks, like summarizing long documents or answering complex questions.
The researchers who developed MetaAligner recognized this challenge and sought to create a more flexible approach to aligning language models to multiple objectives. Their key insight was to use a "conditional weak-to-strong correction" technique, which involves first training the model on a "weak" objective, and then fine-tuning it to perform better on a "strong" objective.
By using this two-step approach, the researchers were able to improve the model's performance on the target tasks while still maintaining strong performance on the original task. This makes MetaAligner a more generalizable and practical solution for adapting language models to diverse use cases.
The researchers evaluated MetaAligner on a range of tasks, including link to MAPO, link to NEMO-Aligner, and link to Reward Model Transfer. The results showed that MetaAligner was able to outperform existing approaches in terms of both task performance and model efficiency.
Technical Explanation
The key technical contribution of MetaAligner is the use of a "conditional weak-to-strong correction" approach to align language models to multiple objectives. This involves first training the model on a "weak" objective, such as next-word prediction, and then fine-tuning it to perform better on a "strong" objective, such as question answering or text summarization.
The researchers hypothesized that this two-step approach would allow the model to leverage the general language understanding skills learned during the initial training, while also fine-tuning to the specific requirements of the target tasks. This is in contrast to approaches like link to Linear Alignment and link to METAL, which attempt to directly optimize the model for multiple objectives simultaneously.
The researchers evaluated MetaAligner on a range of tasks and datasets, including link to MAPO, link to NEMO-Aligner, and link to Reward Model Transfer. The results showed that MetaAligner was able to outperform existing approaches in terms of both task performance and model efficiency.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that MetaAligner has some limitations. For example, the two-step training process can be computationally expensive, as it requires training the model on the weak objective and then fine-tuning it on the strong objective. Additionally, the performance of MetaAligner may be sensitive to the choice of weak and strong objectives, and the researchers did not explore the impact of this choice in depth.
Another potential concern is the generalizability of MetaAligner. While the researchers evaluated the method on a range of tasks, it's possible that the approach may not be as effective when applied to significantly different types of tasks or domains. Further research would be needed to understand the limits of MetaAligner's applicability.
Overall, the MetaAligner approach represents a promising step forward in the quest to create more flexible and generalizable language models. However, as with any research, there is still room for improvement and further exploration.
Conclusion
The MetaAligner paper presents a novel approach to aligning language models to multiple objectives in a generalizable way. By using a "conditional weak-to-strong correction" technique, the researchers were able to improve the performance of language models on target tasks while still maintaining strong performance on the original task.
The results of the evaluation suggest that MetaAligner is a promising method for adapting language models to diverse use cases, with potential applications in areas like question answering, text summarization, and beyond. While the approach has some limitations, the overall contribution of the paper is significant and could pave the way for further advancements in this important area of research.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
⚙️
Aligner: Efficient Alignment by Learning to Correct
Jiaming Ji, Boyuan Chen, Hantao Lou, Donghai Hong, Borong Zhang, Xuehai Pan, Juntao Dai, Tianyi Qiu, Yaodong Yang
0
0
With the rapid development of large language models (LLMs) and ever-evolving practical requirements, finding an efficient and effective alignment method has never been more critical. However, the tension between the complexity of current alignment methods and the need for rapid iteration in deployment scenarios necessitates the development of a model-agnostic alignment approach that can operate under these constraints. In this paper, we introduce Aligner, a novel and simple alignment paradigm that learns the correctional residuals between preferred and dispreferred answers using a small model. Designed as a model-agnostic, plug-and-play module, Aligner can be directly applied to various open-source and API-based models with only one-off training, making it suitable for rapid iteration. Notably, Aligner can be applied to any powerful, large-scale upstream models. Moreover, it can even iteratively bootstrap the upstream models using corrected responses as synthetic human preference data, breaking through the model's performance ceiling. Our experiments demonstrate performance improvements by deploying the same Aligner model across 11 different LLMs, evaluated on the 3H dimensions (helpfulness, harmlessness, and honesty). Specifically, Aligner-7B has achieved an average improvement of 68.9% in helpfulness and 23.8% in harmlessness across the tested LLMs while also effectively reducing hallucination. In the Alpaca-Eval leaderboard, stacking Aligner-2B on GPT-4 Turbo improved its LC Win Rate from 55.0% to 58.3%, surpassing GPT-4 Omni's 57.5% Win Rate (community report).
6/4/2024
🖼️
Aligners: Decoupling LLMs and Alignment
Lilian Ngweta, Mayank Agarwal, Subha Maity, Alex Gittens, Yuekai Sun, Mikhail Yurochkin
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) need to be aligned with human expectations to ensure their safety and utility in most applications. Alignment is challenging, costly, and needs to be repeated for every LLM and alignment criterion. We propose to decouple LLMs and alignment by training aligner models that can be used to align any LLM for a given criteria on an as-needed basis, thus also reducing the potential negative impacts of alignment on performance. Our recipe for training the aligner models solely relies on synthetic data generated with a (prompted) LLM and can be easily adjusted for a variety of alignment criteria. We use the same synthetic data to train inspectors, binary miss-alignment classification models to guide a squad of multiple aligners. Our empirical results demonstrate consistent improvements when applying aligner squad to various LLMs, including chat-aligned models, across several instruction-following and red-teaming datasets.
6/18/2024
Improving Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Reliability-Aware Alignment
Yue Guo, Yi Yang
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) are now rapidly advancing and surpassing human abilities on many natural language tasks. However, aligning these super-human LLMs with human knowledge remains challenging because the supervision signals from human annotators may be wrong. This issue, known as the super-alignment problem, requires enhancing weak-to-strong generalization, where a strong LLM must generalize from imperfect supervision provided by a weaker source. To address this issue, we propose an approach to improve weak-to-strong generalization by involving the reliability of weak supervision signals in the alignment process. In our method, we query the weak supervisor for multiple answers, estimate the answer reliability, and enhance the alignment process by filtering out uncertain data or re-weighting reliable data. Experiments on four datasets demonstrate that our methods effectively identify the quality of weak labels and significantly enhance weak-to-strong generalization. Our work presents effective techniques for error-robust model alignment, reducing error propagation from noisy supervision and enhancing the accuracy and reliability of LLMs. Codes are publicly available at http://github.com/Irenehere/ReliableAlignment.
6/28/2024
💬
AlignGPT: Multi-modal Large Language Models with Adaptive Alignment Capability
Fei Zhao, Taotian Pang, Chunhui Li, Zhen Wu, Junjie Guo, Shangyu Xing, Xinyu Dai
0
0
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are widely regarded as crucial in the exploration of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The core of MLLMs lies in their capability to achieve cross-modal alignment. To attain this goal, current MLLMs typically follow a two-phase training paradigm: the pre-training phase and the instruction-tuning phase. Despite their success, there are shortcomings in the modeling of alignment capabilities within these models. Firstly, during the pre-training phase, the model usually assumes that all image-text pairs are uniformly aligned, but in fact the degree of alignment between different image-text pairs is inconsistent. Secondly, the instructions currently used for finetuning incorporate a variety of tasks, different tasks's instructions usually require different levels of alignment capabilities, but previous MLLMs overlook these differentiated alignment needs. To tackle these issues, we propose a new multimodal large language model AlignGPT. In the pre-training stage, instead of treating all image-text pairs equally, we assign different levels of alignment capabilities to different image-text pairs. Then, in the instruction-tuning phase, we adaptively combine these different levels of alignment capabilities to meet the dynamic alignment needs of different instructions. Extensive experimental results show that our model achieves competitive performance on 12 benchmarks.
5/24/2024