MixCE: Training Autoregressive Language Models by Mixing Forward and Reverse Cross-Entropies

Overview

• Autoregressive language models are trained to minimize the cross-entropy between the model distribution and the data distribution, which is equivalent to maximum likelihood estimation (MLE).
• The authors observed that models trained this way may over-generalize and produce non-human-like text.
• They propose an objective called MixCE that mixes the forward cross-entropy (from the model to the data) and the reverse cross-entropy (from the data to the model).
• Evaluations on synthetic and real data show that models trained with MixCE generate better text without complex decoding strategies.

Plain English Explanation

Language models are trained to predict the next word in a sequence based on the previous words. This is done by minimizing the cross-entropy, which measures how different the model's predictions are from the actual words in the training data. In other words, the model is trying to learn to generate text that is as similar as possible to the training data.

However, the authors found that models trained this way may sometimes generate text that doesn't quite sound human-like. They believe this is because the standard cross-entropy objective doesn't fully capture how humans evaluate text.

To address this, the authors propose a new objective called MixCE, which combines the standard forward cross-entropy (from the model to the data) with a reverse cross-entropy (from the data to the model). The reverse cross-entropy is meant to better reflect how a human would judge the generated text.

The authors evaluate their MixCE approach on both synthetic data (where the true data distribution is known) and real-world data. They find that models trained with MixCE generate text that is more natural and human-like, without requiring complex decoding strategies.

Technical Explanation

Autoregressive language models are typically trained to minimize the forward cross-entropy between the model distribution Q and the data distribution P. This is equivalent to performing maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to learn the model parameters.

The authors observed that models trained this way may over-generalize and produce text that does not resemble natural human language. They hypothesize that the reverse cross-entropy, i.e., the cross-entropy of P relative to Q, may be a better reflection of how a human would evaluate the generated text.

To this end, the authors propose an objective called MixCE, which combines the forward and reverse cross-entropies. They evaluate their approach on both synthetic data settings (where the true data distribution P is known) and real-world data. The results show that models trained with MixCE generate text that is more natural and human-like, without requiring complex decoding strategies.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful approach to improving the text generation capabilities of autoregressive language models. The key insight - that the reverse cross-entropy may better capture human evaluation of text quality - is an interesting and plausible hypothesis.

However, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential limitations or caveats of the MixCE approach. For example, it would be valuable to understand how the relative weighting of the forward and reverse cross-entropies affects the model's performance and the tradeoffs involved.

Additionally, the authors only evaluate their approach on a limited set of datasets and tasks. It would be helpful to see how MixCE-trained models perform on a wider range of real-world applications, such as data mixing or predictive modeling, to better understand its broader implications and potential limitations.

Overall, the paper presents an intriguing idea and initial results, but further research and analysis would be valuable to fully assess the merits and drawbacks of the MixCE approach.

Conclusion

The authors propose a novel objective called MixCE that combines the forward and reverse cross-entropies for training autoregressive language models. This approach is motivated by the observation that models trained with standard maximum likelihood estimation may over-generalize and produce text that does not sound human-like.

Evaluations on both synthetic and real-world data show that models trained with MixCE generate text that is more natural and coherent, without requiring complex decoding strategies. This suggests that the MixCE objective may be a promising direction for improving the text generation capabilities of language models.

If further research can address the potential limitations and expand the applications of this approach, the MixCE method could have significant implications for the development of more human-like and versatile language models.