Simple-Sampling and Hard-Mixup with Prototypes to Rebalance Contrastive Learning for Text Classification
2405.11524
0
0
Abstract
Text classification is a crucial and fundamental task in natural language processing. Compared with the previous learning paradigm of pre-training and fine-tuning by cross entropy loss, the recently proposed supervised contrastive learning approach has received tremendous attention due to its powerful feature learning capability and robustness. Although several studies have incorporated this technique for text classification, some limitations remain. First, many text datasets are imbalanced, and the learning mechanism of supervised contrastive learning is sensitive to data imbalance, which may harm the model performance. Moreover, these models leverage separate classification branch with cross entropy and supervised contrastive learning branch without explicit mutual guidance. To this end, we propose a novel model named SharpReCL for imbalanced text classification tasks. First, we obtain the prototype vector of each class in the balanced classification branch to act as a representation of each class. Then, by further explicitly leveraging the prototype vectors, we construct a proper and sufficient target sample set with the same size for each class to perform the supervised contrastive learning procedure. The empirical results show the effectiveness of our model, which even outperforms popular large language models across several datasets.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes two novel techniques, Simple-Sampling and Hard-Mixup, to address class imbalance in contrastive learning for text classification.
- The authors introduce the use of prototypes to guide the contrastive learning process and rebalance the training data.
- The proposed methods aim to improve the performance of contrastive learning models on long-tailed and multi-label text classification tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a common challenge in machine learning: class imbalance. In many real-world datasets, some classes or categories have significantly fewer examples than others. This can cause machine learning models to perform poorly on the underrepresented classes.
The authors of this paper developed two new techniques to address this issue in the context of contrastive learning for text classification. Contrastive learning is a powerful approach that learns useful representations by comparing similar and dissimilar examples.
The first technique, Simple-Sampling, selectively samples training examples from the underrepresented classes to ensure they are given more attention during training. This helps the model learn better representations for these classes.
The second technique, Hard-Mixup, creates new training examples by combining, or "mixing up," existing examples in a way that emphasizes the underrepresented classes. This helps the model learn more robust and generalized representations.
The authors also introduce the use of prototypes, which are representative examples of each class. These prototypes are used to guide the contrastive learning process and further rebalance the training data.
By combining these techniques, the researchers were able to improve the performance of contrastive learning models on long-tailed and multi-label text classification tasks, where some classes have far fewer examples than others.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes two main techniques to address class imbalance in contrastive learning for text classification:
-
Simple-Sampling: This method selectively samples training examples from the underrepresented classes to ensure they receive more attention during training. The authors use a simple probability-based sampling strategy to increase the frequency of examples from minority classes.
-
Hard-Mixup: This technique creates new training examples by "mixing up" existing examples in a way that emphasizes the underrepresented classes. The authors use a Mixup approach, but with a focus on mixing examples from different classes to generate more challenging examples for the model.
In addition, the authors introduce the use of prototypes to guide the contrastive learning process. Prototypes are representative examples of each class, which are used to compute the contrastive loss and rebalance the training data. This helps the model learn more robust and generalized representations, especially for the underrepresented classes.
The paper evaluates the proposed techniques on several long-tailed and multi-label text classification datasets, including Reuters and RCV1. The results show that the combination of Simple-Sampling, Hard-Mixup, and prototypes can significantly improve the performance of contrastive learning models on these challenging tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and comprehensive study on addressing class imbalance in contrastive learning for text classification. The authors provide a clear and detailed explanation of their proposed techniques, and the experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach.
One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses solely on text classification tasks. It would be interesting to see if the proposed techniques can be extended to other domains, such as image classification, where class imbalance is also a common challenge.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a thorough analysis of the computational complexity or training time of the proposed methods. This information would be useful for understanding the practical implications of adopting these techniques in real-world applications.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of contrastive learning and provides a promising approach to address class imbalance in text classification tasks. The use of prototypes and the combination of Simple-Sampling and Hard-Mixup are innovative ideas that could inspire further research in this area.
Conclusion
This paper presents two novel techniques, Simple-Sampling and Hard-Mixup, to address class imbalance in contrastive learning for text classification. By selectively sampling and mixing up training examples, and using prototypes to guide the learning process, the authors were able to significantly improve the performance of contrastive learning models on long-tailed and multi-label text classification tasks.
The proposed methods offer a practical and effective solution to a common challenge in machine learning, and the insights from this research can inform the development of more robust and equitable text classification models. As the field of contrastive learning continues to evolve, techniques like those presented in this paper will play an important role in ensuring these models can perform well across a diverse range of real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Exploring Contrastive Learning for Long-Tailed Multi-Label Text Classification
Alexandre Audibert, Aur'elien Gauffre, Massih-Reza Amini
0
0
Learning an effective representation in multi-label text classification (MLTC) is a significant challenge in NLP. This challenge arises from the inherent complexity of the task, which is shaped by two key factors: the intricate connections between labels and the widespread long-tailed distribution of the data. To overcome this issue, one potential approach involves integrating supervised contrastive learning with classical supervised loss functions. Although contrastive learning has shown remarkable performance in multi-class classification, its impact in the multi-label framework has not been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we conduct an in-depth study of supervised contrastive learning and its influence on representation in MLTC context. We emphasize the importance of considering long-tailed data distributions to build a robust representation space, which effectively addresses two critical challenges associated with contrastive learning that we identify: the lack of positives and the attraction-repulsion imbalance. Building on this insight, we introduce a novel contrastive loss function for MLTC. It attains Micro-F1 scores that either match or surpass those obtained with other frequently employed loss functions, and demonstrates a significant improvement in Macro-F1 scores across three multi-label datasets.
4/16/2024
Rethinking Class-Incremental Learning from a Dynamic Imbalanced Learning Perspective
Leyuan Wang, Liuyu Xiang, Yunlong Wang, Huijia Wu, Zhaofeng He
0
0
Deep neural networks suffer from catastrophic forgetting when continually learning new concepts. In this paper, we analyze this problem from a data imbalance point of view. We argue that the imbalance between old task and new task data contributes to forgetting of the old tasks. Moreover, the increasing imbalance ratio during incremental learning further aggravates the problem. To address the dynamic imbalance issue, we propose Uniform Prototype Contrastive Learning (UPCL), where uniform and compact features are learned. Specifically, we generate a set of non-learnable uniform prototypes before each task starts. Then we assign these uniform prototypes to each class and guide the feature learning through prototype contrastive learning. We also dynamically adjust the relative margin between old and new classes so that the feature distribution will be maintained balanced and compact. Finally, we demonstrate through extensive experiments that the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance on several benchmark datasets including CIFAR100, ImageNet100 and TinyImageNet.
5/27/2024
Bayesian Learning-driven Prototypical Contrastive Loss for Class-Incremental Learning
Nisha L. Raichur, Lucas Heublein, Tobias Feigl, Alexander Rugamer, Christopher Mutschler, Felix Ott
0
0
The primary objective of methods in continual learning is to learn tasks in a sequential manner over time from a stream of data, while mitigating the detrimental phenomenon of catastrophic forgetting. In this paper, we focus on learning an optimal representation between previous class prototypes and newly encountered ones. We propose a prototypical network with a Bayesian learning-driven contrastive loss (BLCL) tailored specifically for class-incremental learning scenarios. Therefore, we introduce a contrastive loss that incorporates new classes into the latent representation by reducing the intra-class distance and increasing the inter-class distance. Our approach dynamically adapts the balance between the cross-entropy and contrastive loss functions with a Bayesian learning technique. Empirical evaluations conducted on both the CIFAR-10 dataset for image classification and images of a GNSS-based dataset for interference classification validate the efficacy of our method, showcasing its superiority over existing state-of-the-art approaches.
5/21/2024
PromptSync: Bridging Domain Gaps in Vision-Language Models through Class-Aware Prototype Alignment and Discrimination
Anant Khandelwal
0
0
The potential for zero-shot generalization in vision-language (V-L) models such as CLIP has spurred their widespread adoption in addressing numerous downstream tasks. Previous methods have employed test-time prompt tuning to adapt the model to unseen domains, but they overlooked the issue of imbalanced class distributions. In this study, we explicitly address this problem by employing class-aware prototype alignment weighted by mean class probabilities obtained for the test sample and filtered augmented views. Additionally, we ensure that the class probabilities are as accurate as possible by performing prototype discrimination using contrastive learning. The combination of alignment and discriminative loss serves as a geometric regularizer, preventing the prompt representation from collapsing onto a single class and effectively bridging the distribution gap between the source and test domains. Our method, named PromptSync, synchronizes the prompts for each test sample on both the text and vision branches of the V-L model. In empirical evaluations on the domain generalization benchmark, our method outperforms previous best methods by 2.33% in overall performance, by 1% in base-to-novel generalization, and by 2.84% in cross-dataset transfer tasks.
4/15/2024