Looking at Model Debiasing through the Lens of Anomaly Detection
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores model debiasing through the lens of anomaly detection.
- It investigates how anomaly detection can be used to identify biases in machine learning models and develop debiasing techniques.
- The research aims to provide a better understanding of the relationship between model biases and anomaly detection.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how we can use anomaly detection to identify and address biases in machine learning models. Biases can creep into models due to issues with the training data or the model architecture. By treating biases as anomalies, the researchers explore ways to debias the models and improve their generalization. The goal is to develop a better understanding of the relationship between model biases and anomaly detection, which could lead to more effective debiasing techniques.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the connection between model debiasing and anomaly detection. The researchers hypothesize that biases in machine learning models can be viewed as anomalies, and that techniques from the anomaly detection literature can be leveraged to identify and mitigate these biases.
The paper first reviews the existing work on model debiasing and anomaly detection, highlighting the potential synergies between the two fields. It then presents a framework for using anomaly detection to detect and mitigate biases in machine learning models.
The key elements of the framework include:
- Defining appropriate anomaly detection techniques to identify biases in model outputs or internal representations
- Developing debiasing strategies that incorporate the insights from anomaly detection, such as reweighting or fine-tuning the model
- Evaluating the effectiveness of the debiasing approach through both quantitative and qualitative analyses
The paper reports on experimental results that demonstrate the potential of this approach, showing how anomaly detection can be used to identify and correct biases in machine learning models. The findings suggest that the intersection of model debiasing and anomaly detection is a promising area for further research.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful exploration of using anomaly detection techniques to address model biases. The authors make a compelling case for the potential synergies between these two fields, and the experimental results offer promising evidence to support their approach.
However, the paper also acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research. For example, the anomaly detection techniques used in the study may not be able to capture all types of biases, and more work is needed to understand the complexities of the relationship between biases and anomalies.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential challenges or unintended consequences of using anomaly detection for debiasing, such as the risk of overcorrecting or introducing new biases. A more thorough discussion of these issues would have strengthened the critical analysis.
Overall, the paper offers a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to develop effective debiasing techniques for machine learning models. The authors encourage readers to think critically about the research and to continue exploring the intersection of model debiasing and anomaly detection.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to model debiasing by leveraging techniques from the field of anomaly detection. The researchers demonstrate how biases in machine learning models can be viewed as anomalies, and how anomaly detection can be used to identify and mitigate these biases.
The findings suggest that the intersection of model debiasing and anomaly detection is a promising area for further research, with the potential to lead to more effective debiasing techniques. While the paper acknowledges some limitations, it provides a solid foundation for continued exploration and experimentation in this important area of machine learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Looking at Model Debiasing through the Lens of Anomaly Detection
Vito Paolo Pastore, Massimiliano Ciranni, Davide Marinelli, Francesca Odone, Vittorio Murino
It is widely recognized that deep neural networks are sensitive to bias in the data. This means that during training these models are likely to learn spurious correlations between data and labels, resulting in limited generalization abilities and low performance. In this context, model debiasing approaches can be devised aiming at reducing the model's dependency on such unwanted correlations, either leveraging the knowledge of bias information or not. In this work, we focus on the latter and more realistic scenario, showing the importance of accurately predicting the bias-conflicting and bias-aligned samples to obtain compelling performance in bias mitigation. On this ground, we propose to conceive the problem of model bias from an out-of-distribution perspective, introducing a new bias identification method based on anomaly detection. We claim that when data is mostly biased, bias-conflicting samples can be regarded as outliers with respect to the bias-aligned distribution in the feature space of a biased model, thus allowing for precisely detecting them with an anomaly detection method. Coupling the proposed bias identification approach with bias-conflicting data upsampling and augmentation in a two-step strategy, we reach state-of-the-art performance on synthetic and real benchmark datasets. Ultimately, our proposed approach shows that the data bias issue does not necessarily require complex debiasing methods, given that an accurate bias identification procedure is defined.
Read more7/26/2024
0
Model Debiasing by Learnable Data Augmentation
Pietro Morerio, Ruggero Ragonesi, Vittorio Murino
Deep Neural Networks are well known for efficiently fitting training data, yet experiencing poor generalization capabilities whenever some kind of bias dominates over the actual task labels, resulting in models learning shortcuts. In essence, such models are often prone to learn spurious correlations between data and labels. In this work, we tackle the problem of learning from biased data in the very realistic unsupervised scenario, i.e., when the bias is unknown. This is a much harder task as compared to the supervised case, where auxiliary, bias-related annotations, can be exploited in the learning process. This paper proposes a novel 2-stage learning pipeline featuring a data augmentation strategy able to regularize the training. First, biased/unbiased samples are identified by training over-biased models. Second, such subdivision (typically noisy) is exploited within a data augmentation framework, properly combining the original samples while learning mixing parameters, which has a regularization effect. Experiments on synthetic and realistic biased datasets show state-of-the-art classification accuracy, outperforming competing methods, ultimately proving robust performance on both biased and unbiased examples. Notably, being our training method totally agnostic to the level of bias, it also positively affects performance for any, even apparently unbiased, dataset, thus improving the model generalization regardless of the level of bias (or its absence) in the data.
Read more8/12/2024
0
Language-guided Detection and Mitigation of Unknown Dataset Bias
Zaiying Zhao, Soichiro Kumano, Toshihiko Yamasaki
Dataset bias is a significant problem in training fair classifiers. When attributes unrelated to classification exhibit strong biases towards certain classes, classifiers trained on such dataset may overfit to these bias attributes, substantially reducing the accuracy for minority groups. Mitigation techniques can be categorized according to the availability of bias information (ie, prior knowledge). Although scenarios with unknown biases are better suited for real-world settings, previous work in this field often suffers from a lack of interpretability regarding biases and lower performance. In this study, we propose a framework to identify potential biases as keywords without prior knowledge based on the partial occurrence in the captions. We further propose two debiasing methods: (a) handing over to an existing debiasing approach which requires prior knowledge by assigning pseudo-labels, and (b) employing data augmentation via text-to-image generative models, using acquired bias keywords as prompts. Despite its simplicity, experimental results show that our framework not only outperforms existing methods without prior knowledge, but also is even comparable with a method that assumes prior knowledge.
Read more6/6/2024
0
Towards Real World Debiasing: A Fine-grained Analysis On Spurious Correlation
Zhibo Wang, Peng Kuang, Zhixuan Chu, Jingyi Wang, Kui Ren
Spurious correlations in training data significantly hinder the generalization capability of machine learning models when faced with distribution shifts in real-world scenarios. To tackle the problem, numerous debias approaches have been proposed and benchmarked on datasets intentionally designed with severe biases. However, it remains to be asked: textit{1. Do existing benchmarks really capture biases in the real world? 2. Can existing debias methods handle biases in the real world?} To answer the questions, we revisit biased distributions in existing benchmarks and real-world datasets, and propose a fine-grained framework for analyzing dataset bias by disentangling it into the magnitude and prevalence of bias. We observe and theoretically demonstrate that existing benchmarks poorly represent real-world biases. We further introduce two novel biased distributions to bridge this gap, forming a nuanced evaluation framework for real-world debiasing. Building upon these results, we evaluate existing debias methods with our evaluation framework. Results show that existing methods are incapable of handling real-world biases. Through in-depth analysis, we propose a simple yet effective approach that can be easily applied to existing debias methods, named Debias in Destruction (DiD). Empirical results demonstrate the superiority of DiD, improving the performance of existing methods on all types of biases within the proposed evaluation framework.
Read more5/31/2024