Model Editing at Scale leads to Gradual and Catastrophic Forgetting

Overview

• This research paper explores the challenges of model editing at scale, particularly the issues of gradual and catastrophic forgetting.
• It builds on previous work in Unified Framework for Model Editing, Rebuilding ROME: Resolving Model Collapse During Sequential, Unveiling Pitfalls of Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models, and WISE: Rethinking Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing.
• The paper presents an empirical study on the catastrophic forgetting experienced by large language models during sequential model editing.

Plain English Explanation

This research looks at the challenges that come with editing large AI models, like language models, over time. As you make changes to these models to update their knowledge or capabilities, the models can start to "forget" information they previously learned. This can happen gradually, where the model slowly loses some of its original knowledge. It can also happen in a more sudden, "catastrophic" way, where the model completely forgets large parts of what it knew before.

The researchers build on previous work that has explored different ways to try to address these forgetting issues. In this paper, they take a closer look at how severe the forgetting can be as you continuously edit and update a large language model. They want to better understand the scope of the problem and identify potential solutions.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents an empirical study on the effects of sequential model editing on large language models. The researchers used a popular language model called GPT-2 and made gradual changes to its knowledge and capabilities over time, simulating the kind of continuous updates a real-world model might undergo.

They measured the model's performance on a variety of tasks before and after these editing steps, looking for both gradual declines in performance (gradual forgetting) as well as sudden, dramatic drops (catastrophic forgetting). The experiments were designed to systematically explore different editing scenarios, such as adding new knowledge vs. overwriting old knowledge.

The results show that language models like GPT-2 do indeed suffer from both gradual and catastrophic forgetting as they are edited over time. The severity depends on factors like the type of editing and the specific tasks being measured. The paper also discusses potential mitigation strategies based on previous related work.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable empirical evidence of the significant forgetting issues faced by large language models during sequential editing. This is an important problem that needs to be addressed as these models become more widely used and updated over time.

However, the study is limited to a single model (GPT-2) and a relatively small set of editing scenarios. There may be other factors, model architectures, or editing approaches that could lead to different results. Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore potential root causes or solutions beyond referencing prior related work.

Further research is needed to fully characterize the forgetting problem across a wider range of models and editing use cases. Developing more robust model update techniques and architectural choices to mitigate forgetting should also be a priority for the field.

Conclusion

This paper makes an important contribution by quantifying the gradual and catastrophic forgetting that occurs when continuously editing large language models like GPT-2. The findings highlight a critical challenge that must be solved for these models to be reliably updated and maintained over time.

While the results are concerning, they also motivate further research into model architectures, training regimes, and editing techniques that can better preserve a model's knowledge and capabilities. Addressing the forgetting problem is essential for realizing the full potential of large-scale, continuously updated AI systems.