A Unified Framework for Model Editing

Read original: arXiv:2403.14236 - Published 7/26/2024 by Akshat Gupta, Dev Sajnani, Gopala Anumanchipalli
Total Score

0

A Unified Framework for Model Editing

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Presents a unified framework for model editing, addressing challenges in sequential model updates and fine-tuning large language models (LLMs)
  • Connects two previous approaches, ROME and MEMIT, under the "preservation-memorization" principle
  • Explores editing multimodal LLMs, as discussed in Can We Edit Multimodal Large Language Models?
  • Builds on MeMLLM, which enables LLMs to use explicit memory

Plain English Explanation

This paper presents a comprehensive framework for editing and updating machine learning models, particularly large language models (LLMs). The key idea is to balance the need to preserve the model's existing knowledge (preservation) with the ability to learn new information (memorization).

The paper connects two previous approaches, ROME and MEMIT, under this "preservation-memorization" principle. ROME addressed the challenge of sequential model updates, where new knowledge can lead to the loss of previously learned information. MEMIT focused on editing individual neurons in LLMs to update their capabilities, like adding new programming skills.

The paper also explores editing multimodal LLMs, which can process and generate different types of content, like text, images, and code. Additionally, it builds on the MeMLLM approach, which allows LLMs to use explicit memory, similar to how humans can recall specific information.

The goal of this unified framework is to provide a more flexible and effective way to edit and update machine learning models, particularly large and complex ones like LLMs. This could have important implications for a wide range of applications, from language modeling to task-specific AI systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a "preservation-memorization" framework that connects two previous approaches, ROME and MEMIT, for editing machine learning models. ROME focused on addressing the problem of "model collapse" during sequential model updates, where new knowledge can lead to the loss of previously learned information. MEMIT, on the other hand, explored editing individual neurons in large language models (LLMs) to update their capabilities, such as adding new programming skills.

The preservation-memorization framework aims to balance the need to preserve a model's existing knowledge (preservation) with the ability to learn new information (memorization). This is achieved through a two-stage process: first, the model's existing knowledge is preserved, and then new information is incorporated through a memorization stage.

The paper also explores editing multimodal LLMs, which can process and generate different types of content, such as text, images, and code. This is an important extension, as many real-world applications require models that can handle diverse data formats.

Additionally, the framework builds on the MeMLLM approach, which enables LLMs to use explicit memory, similar to how humans can recall specific information. This could lead to more efficient and effective model updates, as the model can selectively update its knowledge rather than relearning everything from scratch.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising framework for addressing the challenges of model editing and updating, particularly for large and complex models like LLMs. By connecting ROME and MEMIT under the preservation-memorization principle, the authors have developed a more comprehensive approach that could be widely applicable.

However, the paper does not provide detailed experimental results or extensive evaluations of the proposed framework. While the theoretical foundations and connections to prior work are compelling, more empirical evidence would be needed to fully assess the practical benefits and limitations of this approach.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential ethical concerns around model editing, such as the risk of introducing biases or the implications of allowing users to extensively modify the behavior of powerful AI systems. These are important considerations that should be further explored in future research.

Conclusion

The paper presents a unified framework for model editing that aims to balance the preservation of existing knowledge with the ability to learn new information. By connecting ROME and MEMIT under the preservation-memorization principle, the authors have developed a more comprehensive approach to addressing the challenges of sequential model updates and fine-tuning large language models.

This framework has the potential to enable more flexible and effective model editing, with applications across a wide range of domains. However, further empirical evaluation and consideration of ethical implications are needed to fully understand the impact and practical limitations of this approach.

Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the field of model editing, with the preservation-memorization framework offering a promising direction for future research and development in this area.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

A Unified Framework for Model Editing
Total Score

0

A Unified Framework for Model Editing

Akshat Gupta, Dev Sajnani, Gopala Anumanchipalli

ROME and MEMIT are largely believed to be two different model editing algorithms, with the major difference between them being the ability to perform batched edits. In this paper, we unify these two algorithms under a single conceptual umbrella, optimizing for the same goal, which we call the preservation-memorization objective. ROME uses an equality constraint to optimize this objective to perform one edit at a time, whereas MEMIT employs a more flexible least-square constraint that allows for batched edits. We generalize ROME and enable batched editing with equality constraint in the form of EMMET - an Equality-constrained Mass Model Editing algorithm for Transformers, a new batched memory-editing algorithm. EMMET can perform batched-edits up to a batch-size of 10,000, with very similar performance to MEMIT across multiple dimensions. With the introduction of EMMET, we truly unify ROME and MEMIT and show that both algorithms are equivalent in terms of their optimization objective, their abilities (singular and batched editing), their model editing performance and their limitations.

Read more

7/26/2024

Model Editing at Scale leads to Gradual and Catastrophic Forgetting
Total Score

0

Model Editing at Scale leads to Gradual and Catastrophic Forgetting

Akshat Gupta, Anurag Rao, Gopala Anumanchipalli

Editing knowledge in large language models is an attractive capability to have which allows us to correct incorrectly learnt facts during pre-training, as well as update the model with an ever-growing list of new facts. While existing model editing techniques have shown promise, they are usually evaluated using metrics for reliability, specificity and generalization over one or few edits. We argue that for model editing to have practical utility, we must be able to make multiple edits to the same model. With this in mind, we evaluate the current model editing methods at scale, focusing on two state of the art methods: ROME and MEMIT. We find that as the model is edited sequentially with multiple facts, it continually forgets previously edited facts and the ability to perform downstream tasks. This forgetting happens in two phases -- an initial gradual but progressive forgetting phase followed by abrupt or catastrophic forgetting phase. Both gradual and catastrophic forgetting limit the usefulness of model editing methods at scale -- the former making model editing less effective as multiple edits are made to the model while the latter caps the scalability of such model editing methods. Our analysis also highlights other key limitations of ROME and MEMIT at scale. With our work, we push for the development and evaluation of model editing methods keeping scalability in mind.

Read more

6/11/2024

MEMoE: Enhancing Model Editing with Mixture of Experts Adaptors
Total Score

0

MEMoE: Enhancing Model Editing with Mixture of Experts Adaptors

Renzhi Wang, Piji Li

Model editing aims to efficiently alter the behavior of Large Language Models (LLMs) within a desired scope, while ensuring no adverse impact on other inputs. Recent years have witnessed various model editing methods been proposed. However, these methods either exhibit poor overall performance or struggle to strike a balance between generalization and locality. We propose MEMoE, a model editing adapter utilizing a Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture with a knowledge anchor routing strategy. MEMoE updates knowledge using a bypass MoE structure, keeping the original parameters unchanged to preserve the general ability of LLMs. And, the knowledge anchor routing ensures that inputs requiring similar knowledge are routed to the same expert, thereby enhancing the generalization of the updated knowledge. Experimental results show the superiority of our approach over both batch editing and sequential batch editing tasks, exhibiting exceptional overall performance alongside outstanding balance between generalization and locality. Our code will be available.

Read more

6/4/2024

Rebuilding ROME : Resolving Model Collapse during Sequential Model Editing
Total Score

0

Rebuilding ROME : Resolving Model Collapse during Sequential Model Editing

Akshat Gupta, Sidharth Baskaran, Gopala Anumanchipalli

Recent work using Rank-One Model Editing (ROME), a popular model editing method, has shown that there are certain facts that the algorithm is unable to edit without breaking the model. Such edits have previously been called disabling edits. These disabling edits cause immediate model collapse and limits the use of ROME for sequential editing. In this paper, we show that disabling edits are an artifact of irregularities in the implementation of ROME. With this paper, we provide a more stable implementation ROME, which we call r-ROME and show that model collapse is no longer observed when making large scale sequential edits with r-ROME, while further improving generalization and locality of model editing compared to the original implementation of ROME. We also provide a detailed mathematical explanation of the reason behind disabling edits.

Read more

4/17/2024