MPC-Inspired Reinforcement Learning for Verifiable Model-Free Control

Overview

• Introduces a new class of parameterized controllers inspired by Model Predictive Control (MPC)
• The controller resembles a Quadratic Programming (QP) solver of a linear MPC problem, with the parameters of the controller trained via Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) rather than derived from system models
• Addresses limitations of common controllers with Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) or other general neural network architecture used in DRL
• Learned controllers possess verifiable properties like persistent feasibility and asymptotic stability akin to MPC
• Empirically matches MPC and MLP controllers in terms of control performance and has superior robustness against modeling uncertainty and noise
• Significantly more computationally efficient compared to MPC and requires fewer parameters to learn than MLP controllers
• Demonstrated on real-world vehicle drift maneuvering tasks

Plain English Explanation

This paper introduces a new type of controller that is inspired by Model Predictive Control (MPC). Rather than deriving the parameters of the controller from system models, the researchers use Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) to train the parameters.

This approach addresses some of the limitations of other neural network-based controllers, such as a lack of verifiability and performance guarantees. The learned controllers in this paper have properties like persistent feasibility and asymptotic stability, similar to MPC controllers.

The researchers found that their controller matches the performance of MPC and other neural network controllers, but is more robust to uncertainties in the system model and noise. Additionally, the new controller is much more computationally efficient than MPC and requires fewer parameters to learn than traditional neural network controllers.

The researchers demonstrated the potential of this new controller by using it to control a vehicle during a challenging drift maneuvering task, showing its applicability to robotics and other demanding control problems.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new class of parameterized controllers that draw inspiration from Model Predictive Control (MPC). The controller resembles a Quadratic Programming (QP) solver of a linear MPC problem, but the parameters of the controller are trained using Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) rather than derived from system models.

This approach aims to address the limitations of common controllers with Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) or other general neural network architectures used in DRL, in terms of verifiability and performance guarantees. The learned controllers in this paper possess verifiable properties like persistent feasibility and asymptotic stability, similar to MPC controllers.

Numerical examples show that the proposed controller empirically matches MPC and MLP controllers in terms of control performance, while also demonstrating superior robustness against modeling uncertainty and noise. Furthermore, the proposed controller is significantly more computationally efficient compared to MPC and requires fewer parameters to learn than MLP controllers.

The researchers also conducted real-world experiments on a vehicle drift maneuvering task, which demonstrated the potential of these controllers for robotics and other demanding control tasks.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to addressing the limitations of traditional neural network-based controllers used in DRL. By drawing inspiration from MPC and leveraging the verifiable properties of the learned controllers, the researchers have developed a solution that appears to match the performance of existing methods while offering improved computational efficiency and robustness.

However, the paper does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the limitations or potential drawbacks of the proposed approach. For example, it would be helpful to understand the training requirements and the sensitivity of the controllers to hyperparameter tuning or the quality of the training data.

Additionally, while the real-world experiments on vehicle drift maneuvering are encouraging, it would be valuable to see the controllers tested on a broader range of control tasks to fully assess their generalizability and practical applicability.

Further research could also explore the potential to combine this approach with other techniques, such as Gaussian Process-based MPC or Distributionally Robust Policy Learning, to further enhance the performance and robustness of the controllers.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to designing parameterized controllers that combine the benefits of MPC and DRL. By training the controller parameters using DRL instead of relying on system models, the researchers have developed a solution that maintains the desirable properties of MPC while offering improved computational efficiency and robustness.

The results demonstrate the potential of this approach to address the limitations of traditional neural network-based controllers used in DRL, making it a promising direction for further research and development in the field of advanced control systems. The real-world experiments on vehicle drift maneuvering tasks suggest that these controllers may have significant practical applications, particularly in robotics and other demanding control scenarios.