Multi-Agent, Human-Agent and Beyond: A Survey on Cooperation in Social Dilemmas
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper provides a comprehensive review of cooperation in social dilemmas, covering multi-agent systems, human-agent interactions, and beyond.
- It examines the key concepts, theories, and empirical findings related to promoting cooperation in various social settings.
- The survey spans a range of disciplines, including game theory, psychology, and computer science, to offer a multifaceted perspective on this important topic.
Plain English Explanation
When people or autonomous agents interact, they often face social dilemmas - situations where individual and collective interests conflict. For example, in a tragedy of the commons scenario, individuals may be tempted to overuse a shared resource for their own benefit, even though that damages the collective good.
This paper examines how cooperation can emerge and be sustained in such social dilemmas, whether they involve human-agent or multi-agent interactions. It reviews key theories, models, and empirical findings from various fields to provide a comprehensive understanding of this complex topic.
The insights covered in this paper have important implications for designing human-machine social systems that can effectively promote cooperation and achieve mutually beneficial outcomes.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the concept of social dilemmas and their fundamental characteristics. It then delves into the various theoretical frameworks that have been used to study cooperation, such as game theory, evolutionary game theory, and behavioral economics.
The authors discuss how factors like communication, trust, reputation, and social norms can influence cooperative behavior in multi-agent and human-agent settings. They also explore the role of incentive structures, learning algorithms, and institutional designs in shaping cooperative dynamics.
The survey examines a range of experimental studies and real-world case studies that have investigated cooperation in different contexts, from resource management to public goods provision. The authors synthesize the key findings, identifying patterns, tradeoffs, and open challenges in this domain.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-researched overview of the literature on cooperation in social dilemmas. However, it acknowledges that the field is highly complex, with many interacting factors that can influence cooperative behavior. The authors note that more research is needed to fully understand the nuances of cooperation in diverse social settings and to develop effective interventions for promoting it.
One potential limitation of the paper is its broad scope, which may limit the depth of analysis in certain areas. Additionally, the authors do not delve deeply into the ethical considerations and potential risks associated with AI-powered systems that aim to promote cooperation, such as issues of transparency, accountability, and value alignment.
Conclusion
This survey offers a valuable synthesis of the current knowledge on cooperation in social dilemmas, spanning multiple disciplines and levels of analysis. The insights provided can inform the design of more effective and equitable human-machine social systems that can foster cooperation and address complex societal challenges. The paper also highlights the need for continued research to uncover the intricate mechanisms underlying cooperative behavior and to develop innovative approaches for cultivating it in diverse contexts.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Multi-Agent, Human-Agent and Beyond: A Survey on Cooperation in Social Dilemmas
Chunjiang Mu, Hao Guo, Yang Chen, Chen Shen, Shuyue Hu, Zhen Wang
The study of cooperation within social dilemmas has long been a fundamental topic across various disciplines, including computer science and social science. Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have significantly reshaped this field, offering fresh insights into understanding and enhancing cooperation. This survey examines three key areas at the intersection of AI and cooperation in social dilemmas. First, focusing on multi-agent cooperation, we review the intrinsic and external motivations that support cooperation among rational agents, and the methods employed to develop effective strategies against diverse opponents. Second, looking into human-agent cooperation, we discuss the current AI algorithms for cooperating with humans and the human biases towards AI agents. Third, we review the emergent field of leveraging AI agents to enhance cooperation among humans. We conclude by discussing future research avenues, such as using large language models, establishing unified theoretical frameworks, revisiting existing theories of human cooperation, and exploring multiple real-world applications.
Read more7/31/2024
📊
0
Warmth and competence in human-agent cooperation
Kevin R. McKee, Xuechunzi Bai, Susan T. Fiske
Interaction and cooperation with humans are overarching aspirations of artificial intelligence (AI) research. Recent studies demonstrate that AI agents trained with deep reinforcement learning are capable of collaborating with humans. These studies primarily evaluate human compatibility through objective metrics such as task performance, obscuring potential variation in the levels of trust and subjective preference that different agents garner. To better understand the factors shaping subjective preferences in human-agent cooperation, we train deep reinforcement learning agents in Coins, a two-player social dilemma. We recruit $N = 501$ participants for a human-agent cooperation study and measure their impressions of the agents they encounter. Participants' perceptions of warmth and competence predict their stated preferences for different agents, above and beyond objective performance metrics. Drawing inspiration from social science and biology research, we subsequently implement a new ``partner choice'' framework to elicit revealed preferences: after playing an episode with an agent, participants are asked whether they would like to play the next episode with the same agent or to play alone. As with stated preferences, social perception better predicts participants' revealed preferences than does objective performance. Given these results, we recommend human-agent interaction researchers routinely incorporate the measurement of social perception and subjective preferences into their studies.
Read more5/10/2024
🎯
0
On the Complexity of Learning to Cooperate with Populations of Socially Rational Agents
Robert Loftin, Saptarashmi Bandyopadhyay, Mustafa Mert c{C}elikok
Artificially intelligent agents deployed in the real-world will require the ability to reliably textit{cooperate} with humans (as well as other, heterogeneous AI agents). To provide formal guarantees of successful cooperation, we must make some assumptions about how partner agents could plausibly behave. Any realistic set of assumptions must account for the fact that other agents may be just as adaptable as our agent is. In this work, we consider the problem of cooperating with a textit{population} of agents in a finitely-repeated, two player general-sum matrix game with private utilities. Two natural assumptions in such settings are that: 1) all agents in the population are individually rational learners, and 2) when any two members of the population are paired together, with high-probability they will achieve at least the same utility as they would under some Pareto efficient equilibrium strategy. Our results first show that these assumptions alone are insufficient to ensure textit{zero-shot} cooperation with members of the target population. We therefore consider the problem of textit{learning} a strategy for cooperating with such a population using prior observations its members interacting with one another. We provide upper and lower bounds on the number of samples needed to learn an effective cooperation strategy. Most importantly, we show that these bounds can be much stronger than those arising from a naive'' reduction of the problem to one of imitation learning.
Read more7/2/2024
🤔
0
Cooperation Dynamics in Multi-Agent Systems: Exploring Game-Theoretic Scenarios with Mean-Field Equilibria
Vaigarai Sathi, Sabahat Shaik, Jaswanth Nidamanuri
Cooperation is fundamental in Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) and Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), often requiring agents to balance individual gains with collective rewards. In this regard, this paper aims to investigate strategies to invoke cooperation in game-theoretic scenarios, namely the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma, where agents must optimize both individual and group outcomes. Existing cooperative strategies are analyzed for their effectiveness in promoting group-oriented behavior in repeated games. Modifications are proposed where encouraging group rewards will also result in a higher individual gain, addressing real-world dilemmas seen in distributed systems. The study extends to scenarios with exponentially growing agent populations ($N longrightarrow +infty$), where traditional computation and equilibrium determination are challenging. Leveraging mean-field game theory, equilibrium solutions and reward structures are established for infinitely large agent sets in repeated games. Finally, practical insights are offered through simulations using the Multi Agent-Posthumous Credit Assignment trainer, and the paper explores adapting simulation algorithms to create scenarios favoring cooperation for group rewards. These practical implementations bridge theoretical concepts with real-world applications.
Read more5/6/2024