MultiOOD: Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Multiple Modalities

2405.17419

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/28/2024 by Hao Dong, Yue Zhao, Eleni Chatzi, Olga Fink

🔎

Abstract

Detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) samples is important for deploying machine learning models in safety-critical applications such as autonomous driving and robot-assisted surgery. Existing research has mainly focused on unimodal scenarios on image data. However, real-world applications are inherently multimodal, which makes it essential to leverage information from multiple modalities to enhance the efficacy of OOD detection. To establish a foundation for more realistic Multimodal OOD Detection, we introduce the first-of-its-kind benchmark, MultiOOD, characterized by diverse dataset sizes and varying modality combinations. We first evaluate existing unimodal OOD detection algorithms on MultiOOD, observing that the mere inclusion of additional modalities yields substantial improvements. This underscores the importance of utilizing multiple modalities for OOD detection. Based on the observation of Modality Prediction Discrepancy between in-distribution (ID) and OOD data, and its strong correlation with OOD performance, we propose the Agree-to-Disagree (A2D) algorithm to encourage such discrepancy during training. Moreover, we introduce a novel outlier synthesis method, NP-Mix, which explores broader feature spaces by leveraging the information from nearest neighbor classes and complements A2D to strengthen OOD detection performance. Extensive experiments on MultiOOD demonstrate that training with A2D and NP-Mix improves existing OOD detection algorithms by a large margin. Our source code and MultiOOD benchmark are available at https://github.com/donghao51/MultiOOD.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) samples is crucial for deploying machine learning models in safety-critical applications like self-driving cars and robotic surgery.
  • Existing research has mainly focused on OOD detection for single-modal (e.g., image-only) scenarios, but real-world applications are inherently multimodal.
  • The authors introduce the first multimodal OOD detection benchmark, called MultiOOD, to better reflect real-world challenges.
  • They propose two new techniques, Agree-to-Disagree (A2D) and NP-Mix, to enhance OOD detection performance on the MultiOOD benchmark.

Plain English Explanation

Detecting samples that are out of the normal distribution (OOD) is crucial for safely using machine learning models in real-world applications like self-driving cars and robotic surgery. Previous research has mostly focused on OOD detection for single-modal data, like images. However, real-world data is often multimodal, meaning it comes from multiple sources (e.g., images, text, sensor data).

To better reflect these real-world challenges, the researchers created a new benchmark called MultiOOD that includes diverse multimodal datasets. When they tested existing OOD detection methods on MultiOOD, they found that using multiple data modalities significantly improved performance compared to using a single modality.

Based on this observation, the researchers developed two new techniques to further enhance multimodal OOD detection. The first, called Agree-to-Disagree (A2D), encourages the model to learn to predict differences between in-distribution and OOD data. The second, called NP-Mix, synthesizes new OOD samples by combining features from nearby in-distribution classes.

When the researchers tested these new techniques on the MultiOOD benchmark, they found that they significantly improved the performance of existing OOD detection methods. This research highlights the importance of using multimodal data and developing new techniques to make machine learning models more robust and reliable in real-world applications.

Technical Explanation

The authors first evaluate existing unimodal OOD detection algorithms on the newly introduced MultiOOD benchmark, which features diverse dataset sizes and modality combinations. They observe that simply including additional modalities yields substantial improvements in OOD detection performance, underscoring the importance of leveraging multiple modalities.

The authors then propose the Agree-to-Disagree (A2D) algorithm, which is motivated by the observation of "Modality Prediction Discrepancy" between in-distribution (ID) and OOD data. A2D encourages the model to learn this discrepancy during training, which is found to be strongly correlated with OOD performance.

Additionally, the authors introduce a novel outlier synthesis method called NP-Mix, which explores broader feature spaces by leveraging information from nearest neighbor classes. NP-Mix complements the A2D algorithm to further strengthen OOD detection performance.

Extensive experiments on the MultiOOD benchmark demonstrate that training with A2D and NP-Mix significantly improves the performance of existing OOD detection algorithms.

Critical Analysis

The authors have made a valuable contribution by introducing the MultiOOD benchmark, which better reflects the real-world challenges of multimodal OOD detection. However, the benchmark is limited to a specific set of modality combinations and dataset sizes. It would be interesting to see the performance of these methods on a wider range of multimodal datasets, including those with more than two modalities.

Additionally, the authors' focus on modality prediction discrepancy as the key indicator of OOD samples is an interesting approach, but it may not capture all the relevant features that distinguish in-distribution and out-of-distribution data. Future research could explore alternative approaches to identifying discriminative features for multimodal OOD detection.

The proposed NP-Mix technique for outlier synthesis is a novel contribution, but its effectiveness may be limited to certain types of data distributions and modality combinations. More analysis is needed to understand the broader applicability and limitations of this method.

Overall, this research represents an important step towards more robust and reliable multimodal OOD detection, but there is still room for further improvement and exploration in this field.

Conclusion

This paper introduces the first-of-its-kind MultiOOD benchmark for multimodal out-of-distribution (OOD) detection and proposes two new techniques, Agree-to-Disagree (A2D) and NP-Mix, to enhance OOD detection performance. The research highlights the importance of leveraging multiple data modalities for OOD detection and provides a strong foundation for future work in this area. As machine learning models are increasingly deployed in safety-critical applications, this research contributes to the development of more robust and reliable systems that can better handle real-world challenges.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Continual Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection

Continual Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection

Lars Doorenbos, Raphael Sznitman, Pablo M'arquez-Neila

YC

0

Reddit

0

Deep learning models excel when the data distribution during training aligns with testing data. Yet, their performance diminishes when faced with out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, leading to great interest in the field of OOD detection. Current approaches typically assume that OOD samples originate from an unconcentrated distribution complementary to the training distribution. While this assumption is appropriate in the traditional unsupervised OOD (U-OOD) setting, it proves inadequate when considering the place of deployment of the underlying deep learning model. To better reflect this real-world scenario, we introduce the novel setting of continual U-OOD detection. To tackle this new setting, we propose a method that starts from a U-OOD detector, which is agnostic to the OOD distribution, and slowly updates during deployment to account for the actual OOD distribution. Our method uses a new U-OOD scoring function that combines the Mahalanobis distance with a nearest-neighbor approach. Furthermore, we design a confidence-scaled few-shot OOD detector that outperforms previous methods. We show our method greatly improves upon strong baselines from related fields.

Read more

6/5/2024

Exploiting Diffusion Prior for Out-of-Distribution Detection

Exploiting Diffusion Prior for Out-of-Distribution Detection

Armando Zhu, Jiabei Liu, Keqin Li, Shuying Dai, Bo Hong, Peng Zhao, Changsong Wei

YC

0

Reddit

0

Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is crucial for deploying robust machine learning models, especially in areas where security is critical. However, traditional OOD detection methods often fail to capture complex data distributions from large scale date. In this paper, we present a novel approach for OOD detection that leverages the generative ability of diffusion models and the powerful feature extraction capabilities of CLIP. By using these features as conditional inputs to a diffusion model, we can reconstruct the images after encoding them with CLIP. The difference between the original and reconstructed images is used as a signal for OOD identification. The practicality and scalability of our method is increased by the fact that it does not require class-specific labeled ID data, as is the case with many other methods. Extensive experiments on several benchmark datasets demonstrates the robustness and effectiveness of our method, which have significantly improved the detection accuracy.

Read more

6/18/2024

Out-of-distribution Detection in Medical Image Analysis: A survey

Out-of-distribution Detection in Medical Image Analysis: A survey

Zesheng Hong, Yubiao Yue, Yubin Chen, Huanjie Lin, Yuanmei Luo, Mini Han Wang, Weidong Wang, Jialong Xu, Xiaoqi Yang, Zhenzhang Li, Sihong Xie

YC

0

Reddit

0

Computer-aided diagnostics has benefited from the development of deep learning-based computer vision techniques in these years. Traditional supervised deep learning methods assume that the test sample is drawn from the identical distribution as the training data. However, it is possible to encounter out-of-distribution samples in real-world clinical scenarios, which may cause silent failure in deep learning-based medical image analysis tasks. Recently, research has explored various out-of-distribution (OOD) detection situations and techniques to enable a trustworthy medical AI system. In this survey, we systematically review the recent advances in OOD detection in medical image analysis. We first explore several factors that may cause a distributional shift when using a deep-learning-based model in clinic scenarios, with three different types of distributional shift well defined on top of these factors. Then a framework is suggested to categorize and feature existing solutions, while the previous studies are reviewed based on the methodology taxonomy. Our discussion also includes evaluation protocols and metrics, as well as the challenge and a research direction lack of exploration.

Read more

4/30/2024

Toward a Realistic Benchmark for Out-of-Distribution Detection

Toward a Realistic Benchmark for Out-of-Distribution Detection

Pietro Recalcati, Fabio Garcea, Luca Piano, Fabrizio Lamberti, Lia Morra

YC

0

Reddit

0

Deep neural networks are increasingly used in a wide range of technologies and services, but remain highly susceptible to out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, that is, drawn from a different distribution than the original training set. A common approach to address this issue is to endow deep neural networks with the ability to detect OOD samples. Several benchmarks have been proposed to design and validate OOD detection techniques. However, many of them are based on far-OOD samples drawn from very different distributions, and thus lack the complexity needed to capture the nuances of real-world scenarios. In this work, we introduce a comprehensive benchmark for OOD detection, based on ImageNet and Places365, that assigns individual classes as in-distribution or out-of-distribution depending on the semantic similarity with the training set. Several techniques can be used to determine which classes should be considered in-distribution, yielding benchmarks with varying properties. Experimental results on different OOD detection techniques show how their measured efficacy depends on the selected benchmark and how confidence-based techniques may outperform classifier-based ones on near-OOD samples.

Read more

4/17/2024