Navigating simplicity and complexity of social-ecological systems through a dialog between dynamical systems and agent-based models
2402.12086
0
0
🎯
Abstract
Social-ecological systems research aims to understand the nature of social-ecological phenomena, to find ways to foster or manage conditions under which desired phenomena occur or to reduce the negative consequences of undesirable phenomena. Such challenges are often addressed using dynamical systems models (DSM) or agent-based models (ABM). Here we develop an iterative procedure for combining DSM and ABM to leverage their strengths and gain insights that surpass insights obtained by each approach separately. The procedure uses results of an ABM as inputs for a DSM development. In the following steps, results of the DSM analyses guide future analysis of the ABM and vice versa. This dialogue, more than having a tight connection between the models, enables pushing the research frontier, expanding the set of research questions and insights. We illustrate our method with the example of poverty traps and innovation in agricultural systems, but our conclusions are general and can be applied to other DSM-ABM combinations.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents an iterative procedure for combining dynamical systems models (DSMs) and agent-based models (ABMs) to leverage their respective strengths and gain deeper insights.
- The authors illustrate the method using the example of poverty traps and innovation in agricultural systems, but suggest the conclusions are generally applicable.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores a way to combine two different types of models - dynamical systems models (DSMs) and agent-based models (ABMs) - to study complex social and ecological phenomena. DSMs look at the overall system dynamics, while ABMs focus on how individual agents (e.g., people, organizations) interact.
The researchers developed an iterative process where the results from an ABM are used as inputs for a DSM. Then the insights from the DSM help guide future analysis of the ABM, and so on. This "back-and-forth" between the models allows the researchers to uncover new insights that they wouldn't have found by using just one type of model alone.
They illustrate this approach by looking at the problem of poverty traps and innovation in agricultural systems. Poverty traps occur when people get stuck in a cycle of poverty that's difficult to escape. The researchers found that their combined modeling approach was helpful for understanding the complex dynamics involved in this type of phenomenon.
The key idea is that the dialogue between the DSM and ABM, rather than just trying to tightly connect the models, enables the researchers to push the boundaries of their understanding, explore a wider range of research questions, and gain deeper insights. While the example is about agriculture, the authors say the general approach could be applied to other complex social-ecological challenges as well.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an iterative procedure for integrating dynamical systems models (DSMs) and agent-based models (ABMs) to study social-ecological phenomena. DSMs excel at capturing overall system dynamics, while ABMs are better suited for modeling individual agent behaviors and interactions.
The researchers' approach involves using the results of an ABM as inputs for developing a DSM. Then, the insights gained from analyzing the DSM are used to guide further development and analysis of the ABM. This back-and-forth between the two modeling approaches allows the researchers to push the boundaries of their understanding, expand the set of research questions, and uncover insights that would not be possible with either approach alone.
The authors illustrate their method using the example of poverty traps and innovation in agricultural systems. Poverty traps are situations where people get stuck in a cycle of poverty that is difficult to escape. The combined DSM-ABM approach helped the researchers gain a more comprehensive understanding of the complex dynamics underlying this phenomenon.
While the specific example focuses on agricultural systems, the authors suggest the general principles of their iterative DSM-ABM procedure can be applied to other complex social-ecological challenges. Other examples of using combined DSM-ABM approaches include analyzing transport policies in developing countries and understanding the emergence of collective behavior.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable methodological contribution by outlining a systematic approach for integrating DSMs and ABMs to study complex social-ecological systems. The authors acknowledge that their illustrative example of poverty traps and innovation in agriculture is relatively narrow, and encourage further research applying the iterative DSM-ABM procedure to other domains.
One potential limitation is that the method relies on the researchers' ability to effectively translate insights from one modeling approach to inform the other. The success of the integration may depend on the modelers' familiarity with both DSMs and ABMs, as well as their skill in interpreting the results from each.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific computational or technical challenges that may arise when coupling these two modeling paradigms. Further research may be needed to explore issues of data exchange, model synchronization, and computational efficiency when implementing this iterative procedure.
Despite these potential caveats, the authors make a compelling case for the value of bridging DSMs and ABMs to study social-ecological systems. By encouraging readers to think critically about the research and form their own opinions, the paper highlights the importance of maintaining a nuanced perspective when applying new methodological approaches.
Conclusion
This paper presents an innovative approach for combining dynamical systems models (DSMs) and agent-based models (ABMs) to gain deeper insights into complex social-ecological phenomena. The iterative procedure outlined by the researchers allows them to leverage the strengths of each modeling approach, pushing the boundaries of their understanding and expanding the set of research questions that can be addressed.
While the authors illustrate the method using the example of poverty traps and innovation in agricultural systems, they suggest the general principles can be applied to a wide range of complex challenges. By fostering a dialogue between DSMs and ABMs, this combined modeling approach has the potential to yield valuable insights that would not be possible with either method alone, ultimately helping to inform more effective strategies for managing social-ecological systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Learnable & Interpretable Model Combination in Dynamic Systems Modeling
Tobias Thummerer, Lars Mikelsons
0
0
One of the core concepts in science, and something that happens intuitively in every-day dynamic systems modeling, is the combination of models or methods. Especially in dynamical systems modeling, often two or more structures are combined to obtain a more powerful or efficient architecture regarding a specific application (area). Further, even physical simulations are combined with machine learning architectures, to increase prediction accuracy or optimize the computational performance. In this work, we shortly discuss, which types of models are usually combined and propose a model interface that is capable of expressing a width variety of mixed algebraic, discrete and differential equation based models. Further, we examine different established, as well as new ways of combining these models from a system theoretical point of view and highlight two challenges - algebraic loops and local event affect functions in discontinuous models - that require a special approach. Finally, we propose a new wildcard topology, that is capable of describing the generic connection between two combined models in an easy to interpret fashion that can be learned as part of a gradient based optimization procedure. The contributions of this paper are highlighted at a proof of concept: Different connection topologies between two models are learned, interpreted and compared applying the proposed methodology and software implementation.
6/13/2024
📈
Learning Individual Interactions from Population Dynamics with Discrete-Event Simulation Model
Yan Shen, Fan Yang, Mingchen Gao, Wen Dong
0
0
The abundance of data affords researchers to pursue more powerful computational tools to learn the dynamics of complex system, such as neural networks, engineered systems and social networks. Traditional machine learning approaches capture complex system dynamics either with dynamic Bayesian networks and state space models, which is hard to scale because it is non-trivial to prescribe the dynamics with a sparse graph or a system of differential equations; or a deep neural networks, where the distributed representation of the learned dynamics is hard to interpret. In this paper, we will explore the possibility of learning a discrete-event simulation representation of complex system dynamics assuming multivariate normal distribution of the state variables, based on the observation that many complex system dynamics can be decomposed into a sequence of local interactions, which individually change the system state only minimally but in sequence generate complex and diverse dynamics. Our results show that the algorithm can data-efficiently capture complex network dynamics in several fields with meaningful events.
5/16/2024
Analyzing Transport Policies in Developing Countries with ABM
Kathleen Salazar-Serna, Lorena Cadavid, Carlos Franco
0
0
Deciphering travel behavior and mode choices is a critical aspect of effective urban transportation system management, particularly in developing countries where unique socio-economic and cultural conditions complicate decision-making. Agent-based simulations offer a valuable tool for modeling transportation systems, enabling a nuanced understanding and policy impact evaluation. This work aims to shed light on the effects of transport policies and analyzes travel behavior by simulating agents making mode choices for their daily commutes. Agents gather information from the environment and their social network to assess the optimal transport option based on personal satisfaction criteria. Our findings, stemming from simulating a free-fare policy for public transit in a developing-country city, reveal a significant influence on decision-making, fostering public service use while positively influencing pollution levels, accident rates, and travel speed.
5/1/2024
✨
LLM-Augmented Agent-Based Modelling for Social Simulations: Challenges and Opportunities
Onder Gurcan
0
0
As large language models (LLMs) continue to make significant strides, their better integration into agent-based simulations offers a transformational potential for understanding complex social systems. However, such integration is not trivial and poses numerous challenges. Based on this observation, in this paper, we explore architectures and methods to systematically develop LLM-augmented social simulations and discuss potential research directions in this field. We conclude that integrating LLMs with agent-based simulations offers a powerful toolset for researchers and scientists, allowing for more nuanced, realistic, and comprehensive models of complex systems and human behaviours.
5/14/2024