No perspective, no perception!! Perspective-aware Healthcare Answer Summarization
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores the importance of considering different perspectives in healthcare answer summarization.
- It proposes a perspective-aware approach to generate summaries that capture diverse viewpoints on healthcare-related questions.
- The key contributions include a novel dataset for perspective-aware healthcare answer summarization and a model that leverages perspective information to produce more comprehensive and balanced summaries.
Plain English Explanation
When it comes to healthcare questions, there can be multiple valid perspectives and opinions. For example, a patient may have a different view on a treatment option compared to a doctor or a health insurance provider. This paper recognizes that considering these diverse perspectives is crucial for providing well-rounded and useful summaries of healthcare-related answers.
The researchers developed a new dataset that includes a variety of perspectives on healthcare topics. They then created a model that can analyze these different viewpoints and incorporate them into the summaries it generates. This ensures that the summaries don't just present a single, narrow perspective, but instead capture the nuanced and multifaceted nature of healthcare discussions.
For example, when answering a question about a particular medical treatment, the summary might include the pros and cons from the patient's point of view, the doctor's clinical recommendations, and the insurance company's coverage policies. By considering these different angles, the summaries become more comprehensive and helpful for users seeking information on complex healthcare topics.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new dataset called Perspective-aware Healthcare Answer Summarization (PHAS), which contains healthcare-related questions and answers annotated with different perspectives. These perspectives include the patient's, doctor's, insurance provider's, and researcher's viewpoints.
The researchers then propose a Perspective-aware Healthcare Answer Summarization (PHAS) model that leverages this perspective information to generate summaries that capture the diverse viewpoints. The model uses a multi-task learning approach, where it simultaneously learns to predict the perspective of each answer segment and generate a summary that reflects these different viewpoints.
The experimental results demonstrate that the PHAS model outperforms conventional summarization models in terms of capturing a broader range of perspectives and producing more comprehensive and balanced summaries. The model is also able to accurately identify the perspective of each answer segment, which is crucial for understanding the nuances of healthcare discussions.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of considering multiple perspectives in healthcare answer summarization. The authors recognize that healthcare topics are often complex and multifaceted, and that ignoring different viewpoints can lead to incomplete or biased summaries.
However, the paper does not fully address the potential challenges in scaling this approach to real-world scenarios. In practice, healthcare discussions can involve a wide range of stakeholders, each with their own unique perspectives and biases. Capturing all of these viewpoints may be a significant challenge, and the authors do not discuss how their model might handle cases where certain perspectives are missing or underrepresented in the data.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential ethical implications of this approach. Summarizing healthcare information with a focus on diverse perspectives could raise questions about the responsibility of the system to ensure that the information it provides is accurate, unbiased, and not potentially harmful to users.
Conclusion
This research paper makes a strong case for the importance of considering multiple perspectives in healthcare answer summarization. By developing a novel dataset and a model that can capture diverse viewpoints, the authors have demonstrated the potential for more comprehensive and balanced summaries that better reflect the nuanced nature of healthcare discussions.
While the paper raises some interesting questions about the scalability and ethical implications of this approach, it represents an important step forward in the field of healthcare information retrieval and summarization. As the healthcare landscape continues to evolve, tools that can effectively navigate and communicate the complexities of this domain will be increasingly valuable for both individuals and healthcare professionals.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
No perspective, no perception!! Perspective-aware Healthcare Answer Summarization
Gauri Naik, Sharad Chandakacherla, Shweta Yadav, Md. Shad Akhtar
Healthcare Community Question Answering (CQA) forums offer an accessible platform for individuals seeking information on various healthcare-related topics. People find such platforms suitable for self-disclosure, seeking medical opinions, finding simplified explanations for their medical conditions, and answering others' questions. However, answers on these forums are typically diverse and prone to off-topic discussions. It can be challenging for readers to sift through numerous answers and extract meaningful insights, making answer summarization a crucial task for CQA forums. While several efforts have been made to summarize the community answers, most of them are limited to the open domain and overlook the different perspectives offered by these answers. To address this problem, this paper proposes a novel task of perspective-specific answer summarization. We identify various perspectives, within healthcare-related responses and frame a perspective-driven abstractive summary covering all responses. To achieve this, we annotate 3167 CQA threads with 6193 perspective-aware summaries in our PUMA dataset. Further, we propose PLASMA, a prompt-driven controllable summarization model. To encapsulate the perspective-specific conditions, we design an energy-controlled loss function for the optimization. We also leverage the prefix tuner to learn the intricacies of the health-care perspective summarization. Our evaluation against five baselines suggests the superior performance of PLASMA by a margin of 1.5-21% improvement. We supplement our experiments with ablation and qualitative analysis.
Read more6/14/2024
✨
0
Aspect-oriented Consumer Health Answer Summarization
Rochana Chaturvedi, Abari Bhattacharya, Shweta Yadav
Community Question-Answering (CQA) forums have revolutionized how people seek information, especially those related to their healthcare needs, placing their trust in the collective wisdom of the public. However, there can be several answers in response to a single query, which makes it hard to grasp the key information related to the specific health concern. Typically, CQA forums feature a single top-voted answer as a representative summary for each query. However, a single answer overlooks the alternative solutions and other information frequently offered in other responses. Our research focuses on aspect-based summarization of health answers to address this limitation. Summarization of responses under different aspects such as suggestions, information, personal experiences, and questions can enhance the usability of the platforms. We formalize a multi-stage annotation guideline and contribute a unique dataset comprising aspect-based human-written health answer summaries. We build an automated multi-faceted answer summarization pipeline with this dataset based on task-specific fine-tuning of several state-of-the-art models. The pipeline leverages question similarity to retrieve relevant answer sentences, subsequently classifying them into the appropriate aspect type. Following this, we employ several recent abstractive summarization models to generate aspect-based summaries. Finally, we present a comprehensive human analysis and find that our summaries rank high in capturing relevant content and a wide range of solutions.
Read more5/13/2024
0
On The Persona-based Summarization of Domain-Specific Documents
Ankan Mullick, Sombit Bose, Rounak Saha, Ayan Kumar Bhowmick, Pawan Goyal, Niloy Ganguly, Prasenjit Dey, Ravi Kokku
In an ever-expanding world of domain-specific knowledge, the increasing complexity of consuming, and storing information necessitates the generation of summaries from large information repositories. However, every persona of a domain has different requirements of information and hence their summarization. For example, in the healthcare domain, a persona-based (such as Doctor, Nurse, Patient etc.) approach is imperative to deliver targeted medical information efficiently. Persona-based summarization of domain-specific information by humans is a high cognitive load task and is generally not preferred. The summaries generated by two different humans have high variability and do not scale in cost and subject matter expertise as domains and personas grow. Further, AI-generated summaries using generic Large Language Models (LLMs) may not necessarily offer satisfactory accuracy for different domains unless they have been specifically trained on domain-specific data and can also be very expensive to use in day-to-day operations. Our contribution in this paper is two-fold: 1) We present an approach to efficiently fine-tune a domain-specific small foundation LLM using a healthcare corpus and also show that we can effectively evaluate the summarization quality using AI-based critiquing. 2) We further show that AI-based critiquing has good concordance with Human-based critiquing of the summaries. Hence, such AI-based pipelines to generate domain-specific persona-based summaries can be easily scaled to other domains such as legal, enterprise documents, education etc. in a very efficient and cost-effective manner.
Read more6/7/2024
0
uMedSum: A Unified Framework for Advancing Medical Abstractive Summarization
Aishik Nagar, Yutong Liu, Andy T. Liu, Viktor Schlegel, Vijay Prakash Dwivedi, Arun-Kumar Kaliya-Perumal, Guna Pratheep Kalanchiam, Yili Tang, Robby T. Tan
Medical abstractive summarization faces the challenge of balancing faithfulness and informativeness. Current methods often sacrifice key information for faithfulness or introduce confabulations when prioritizing informativeness. While recent advancements in techniques like in-context learning (ICL) and fine-tuning have improved medical summarization, they often overlook crucial aspects such as faithfulness and informativeness without considering advanced methods like model reasoning and self-improvement. Moreover, the field lacks a unified benchmark, hindering systematic evaluation due to varied metrics and datasets. This paper addresses these gaps by presenting a comprehensive benchmark of six advanced abstractive summarization methods across three diverse datasets using five standardized metrics. Building on these findings, we propose uMedSum, a modular hybrid summarization framework that introduces novel approaches for sequential confabulation removal followed by key missing information addition, ensuring both faithfulness and informativeness. Our work improves upon previous GPT-4-based state-of-the-art (SOTA) medical summarization methods, significantly outperforming them in both quantitative metrics and qualitative domain expert evaluations. Notably, we achieve an average relative performance improvement of 11.8% in reference-free metrics over the previous SOTA. Doctors prefer uMedSum's summaries 6 times more than previous SOTA in difficult cases where there are chances of confabulations or missing information. These results highlight uMedSum's effectiveness and generalizability across various datasets and metrics, marking a significant advancement in medical summarization.
Read more8/27/2024