Aspect-oriented Consumer Health Answer Summarization
0
✨
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Community Question-Answering (CQA) forums have become a popular way for people to find information, especially related to healthcare needs.
- While these forums provide access to collective wisdom, it can be challenging to distill the key information from the many responses to a single query.
- Typically, CQA forums feature a single top-voted answer as a summary, but this overlooks alternative solutions and other relevant information in other responses.
- This research focuses on aspect-based summarization of health answers to address this limitation.
Plain English Explanation
Community Question-Answering (CQA) forums have revolutionized how people find information, especially when it comes to their health concerns. Instead of relying solely on professional medical advice, people are turning to these online forums to tap into the collective wisdom of the public.
However, the abundance of responses to a single query can make it difficult to grasp the key information related to the specific health issue. Typically, CQA forums feature a single top-voted answer as a representative summary. But this approach overlooks the alternative solutions and other valuable information that may be scattered across the other responses.
To address this limitation, the researchers in this study focused on aspect-based summarization of health answers. The idea is to summarize the responses under different aspects, such as suggestions, information, personal experiences, and questions. This can enhance the usability of these platforms by providing a more comprehensive and diverse set of insights for users.
Technical Explanation
The researchers in this study formalized a multi-stage annotation guideline and created a unique dataset of aspect-based human-written health answer summaries. They then built an automated multi-faceted answer summarization pipeline using this dataset and state-of-the-art models.
The pipeline first leverages question similarity to retrieve relevant answer sentences. These sentences are then classified into the appropriate aspect type, such as suggestions, information, personal experiences, or questions.
Following this, the researchers employ several recent abstractive summarization models to generate aspect-based summaries. This allows the system to capture the key points from the various responses and present them in a concise and comprehensive manner.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that their approach has some limitations. For example, the dataset they created is focused on health-related queries, and it's unclear how well the pipeline would perform on other types of CQA forums.
Additionally, the researchers note that their study did not consider the time-sensitive nature of some health information, which could be an important factor in certain situations.
Further research could explore ways to incorporate temporal and contextual information into the summarization process, as well as investigate the applicability of the pipeline to other domains beyond healthcare.
Conclusion
This research addresses an important challenge in the world of Community Question-Answering (CQA) forums, especially when it comes to healthcare-related queries. By focusing on aspect-based summarization, the researchers have developed a pipeline that can provide users with a more comprehensive and diverse set of insights, rather than relying on a single, potentially limited, summary.
The implications of this work could extend beyond healthcare, as the principles of aspect-based summarization could be applied to other types of CQA forums to improve the overall user experience and the quality of information shared within these valuable online communities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
✨
0
Aspect-oriented Consumer Health Answer Summarization
Rochana Chaturvedi, Abari Bhattacharya, Shweta Yadav
Community Question-Answering (CQA) forums have revolutionized how people seek information, especially those related to their healthcare needs, placing their trust in the collective wisdom of the public. However, there can be several answers in response to a single query, which makes it hard to grasp the key information related to the specific health concern. Typically, CQA forums feature a single top-voted answer as a representative summary for each query. However, a single answer overlooks the alternative solutions and other information frequently offered in other responses. Our research focuses on aspect-based summarization of health answers to address this limitation. Summarization of responses under different aspects such as suggestions, information, personal experiences, and questions can enhance the usability of the platforms. We formalize a multi-stage annotation guideline and contribute a unique dataset comprising aspect-based human-written health answer summaries. We build an automated multi-faceted answer summarization pipeline with this dataset based on task-specific fine-tuning of several state-of-the-art models. The pipeline leverages question similarity to retrieve relevant answer sentences, subsequently classifying them into the appropriate aspect type. Following this, we employ several recent abstractive summarization models to generate aspect-based summaries. Finally, we present a comprehensive human analysis and find that our summaries rank high in capturing relevant content and a wide range of solutions.
Read more5/13/2024
0
No perspective, no perception!! Perspective-aware Healthcare Answer Summarization
Gauri Naik, Sharad Chandakacherla, Shweta Yadav, Md. Shad Akhtar
Healthcare Community Question Answering (CQA) forums offer an accessible platform for individuals seeking information on various healthcare-related topics. People find such platforms suitable for self-disclosure, seeking medical opinions, finding simplified explanations for their medical conditions, and answering others' questions. However, answers on these forums are typically diverse and prone to off-topic discussions. It can be challenging for readers to sift through numerous answers and extract meaningful insights, making answer summarization a crucial task for CQA forums. While several efforts have been made to summarize the community answers, most of them are limited to the open domain and overlook the different perspectives offered by these answers. To address this problem, this paper proposes a novel task of perspective-specific answer summarization. We identify various perspectives, within healthcare-related responses and frame a perspective-driven abstractive summary covering all responses. To achieve this, we annotate 3167 CQA threads with 6193 perspective-aware summaries in our PUMA dataset. Further, we propose PLASMA, a prompt-driven controllable summarization model. To encapsulate the perspective-specific conditions, we design an energy-controlled loss function for the optimization. We also leverage the prefix tuner to learn the intricacies of the health-care perspective summarization. Our evaluation against five baselines suggests the superior performance of PLASMA by a margin of 1.5-21% improvement. We supplement our experiments with ablation and qualitative analysis.
Read more6/14/2024
0
On The Persona-based Summarization of Domain-Specific Documents
Ankan Mullick, Sombit Bose, Rounak Saha, Ayan Kumar Bhowmick, Pawan Goyal, Niloy Ganguly, Prasenjit Dey, Ravi Kokku
In an ever-expanding world of domain-specific knowledge, the increasing complexity of consuming, and storing information necessitates the generation of summaries from large information repositories. However, every persona of a domain has different requirements of information and hence their summarization. For example, in the healthcare domain, a persona-based (such as Doctor, Nurse, Patient etc.) approach is imperative to deliver targeted medical information efficiently. Persona-based summarization of domain-specific information by humans is a high cognitive load task and is generally not preferred. The summaries generated by two different humans have high variability and do not scale in cost and subject matter expertise as domains and personas grow. Further, AI-generated summaries using generic Large Language Models (LLMs) may not necessarily offer satisfactory accuracy for different domains unless they have been specifically trained on domain-specific data and can also be very expensive to use in day-to-day operations. Our contribution in this paper is two-fold: 1) We present an approach to efficiently fine-tune a domain-specific small foundation LLM using a healthcare corpus and also show that we can effectively evaluate the summarization quality using AI-based critiquing. 2) We further show that AI-based critiquing has good concordance with Human-based critiquing of the summaries. Hence, such AI-based pipelines to generate domain-specific persona-based summaries can be easily scaled to other domains such as legal, enterprise documents, education etc. in a very efficient and cost-effective manner.
Read more6/7/2024
0
Improving Health Question Answering with Reliable and Time-Aware Evidence Retrieval
Juraj Vladika, Florian Matthes
In today's digital world, seeking answers to health questions on the Internet is a common practice. However, existing question answering (QA) systems often rely on using pre-selected and annotated evidence documents, thus making them inadequate for addressing novel questions. Our study focuses on the open-domain QA setting, where the key challenge is to first uncover relevant evidence in large knowledge bases. By utilizing the common retrieve-then-read QA pipeline and PubMed as a trustworthy collection of medical research documents, we answer health questions from three diverse datasets. We modify different retrieval settings to observe their influence on the QA pipeline's performance, including the number of retrieved documents, sentence selection process, the publication year of articles, and their number of citations. Our results reveal that cutting down on the amount of retrieved documents and favoring more recent and highly cited documents can improve the final macro F1 score up to 10%. We discuss the results, highlight interesting examples, and outline challenges for future research, like managing evidence disagreement and crafting user-friendly explanations.
Read more4/15/2024