Normalizing Energy Consumption for Hardware-Independent Evaluation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Provides a method to normalize energy consumption for hardware-independent evaluation of machine learning models
- Addresses the challenge of comparing energy efficiency across different hardware platforms
- Proposes a normalization approach based on hardware-specific power measurements
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a method to compare the energy efficiency of machine learning models across different hardware platforms. This is an important challenge, as the energy consumed by a model can vary significantly depending on the underlying hardware it runs on.
The proposed approach involves normalizing the energy consumption measurements by taking into account the hardware-specific power characteristics. This allows researchers and developers to evaluate the inherent energy efficiency of a model, rather than just the overall power draw on a specific system.
By normalizing the energy consumption, the paper aims to enable more meaningful comparisons of model efficiency, which is crucial for deploying energy-efficient AI systems in real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes an experimental setup where the energy consumption of various machine learning models is measured on different hardware platforms. To enable hardware-independent comparisons, the authors propose a normalization approach that takes into account the power characteristics of the underlying hardware.
The normalization process involves measuring the baseline power draw of each hardware platform, as well as the power draw during model inference. By relating the model-specific power draw to the baseline power, the authors are able to derive a normalized energy consumption metric that is independent of the hardware used.
This hardware-independent energy metric allows for more meaningful comparisons of model efficiency, which is crucial for developing energy-efficient AI systems that can be deployed in real-world applications with varying hardware constraints.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a robust experimental setup and a well-justified normalization approach to address the challenge of hardware-independent energy evaluation. However, the authors acknowledge that the normalization process relies on accurate power measurements, which can be affected by various factors such as environmental conditions and measurement equipment.
Additionally, the authors note that the proposed method may not capture all the nuances of energy consumption, such as the impact of memory access patterns or the efficiency of model quantization. Further research may be needed to explore these more advanced aspects of energy efficiency.
Finally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive evaluation of the proposed normalization approach across a wide range of hardware platforms and model architectures. Validating the method's generalizability and exploring its limitations would strengthen the overall contribution of the research.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel approach to normalizing energy consumption for hardware-independent evaluation of machine learning models. By accounting for the power characteristics of underlying hardware, the proposed normalization method enables more meaningful comparisons of model efficiency, which is crucial for developing energy-efficient AI systems that can be deployed in real-world applications with varying hardware constraints.
The research contributes to the growing field of energy-aware machine learning, providing a practical tool for researchers and developers to assess the inherent energy efficiency of their models, rather than just the overall power draw on a specific system.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Normalizing Energy Consumption for Hardware-Independent Evaluation
Constance Douwes, Romain Serizel
The increasing use of machine learning (ML) models in signal processing has raised concerns about their environmental impact, particularly during resource-intensive training phases. In this study, we present a novel methodology for normalizing energy consumption across different hardware platforms to facilitate fair and consistent comparisons. We evaluate different normalization strategies by measuring the energy used to train different ML architectures on different GPUs, focusing on audio tagging tasks. Our approach shows that the number of reference points, the type of regression and the inclusion of computational metrics significantly influences the normalization process. We find that the appropriate selection of two reference points provides robust normalization, while incorporating the number of floating-point operations and parameters improves the accuracy of energy consumption predictions. By supporting more accurate energy consumption evaluation, our methodology promotes the development of environmentally sustainable ML practices.
Read more9/10/2024
0
Computing Within Limits: An Empirical Study of Energy Consumption in ML Training and Inference
Ioannis Mavromatis, Kostas Katsaros, Aftab Khan
Machine learning (ML) has seen tremendous advancements, but its environmental footprint remains a concern. Acknowledging the growing environmental impact of ML this paper investigates Green ML, examining various model architectures and hyperparameters in both training and inference phases to identify energy-efficient practices. Our study leverages software-based power measurements for ease of replication across diverse configurations, models and datasets. In this paper, we examine multiple models and hardware configurations to identify correlations across the various measurements and metrics and key contributors to energy reduction. Our analysis offers practical guidelines for constructing sustainable ML operations, emphasising energy consumption and carbon footprint reductions while maintaining performance. As identified, short-lived profiling can quantify the long-term expected energy consumption. Moreover, model parameters can also be used to accurately estimate the expected total energy without the need for extensive experimentation.
Read more6/21/2024
0
From Computation to Consumption: Exploring the Compute-Energy Link for Training and Testing Neural Networks for SED Systems
Constance Douwes, Romain Serizel
The massive use of machine learning models, particularly neural networks, has raised serious concerns about their environmental impact. Indeed, over the last few years we have seen an explosion in the computing costs associated with training and deploying these systems. It is, therefore, crucial to understand their energy requirements in order to better integrate them into the evaluation of models, which has so far focused mainly on performance. In this paper, we study several neural network architectures that are key components of sound event detection systems, using an audio tagging task as an example. We measure the energy consumption for training and testing small to large architectures and establish complex relationships between the energy consumption, the number of floating-point operations, the number of parameters, and the GPU/memory utilization.
Read more9/10/2024
0
Evaluating the Energy Consumption of Machine Learning: Systematic Literature Review and Experiments
Charlotte Rodriguez, Laura Degioanni, Laetitia Kameni, Richard Vidal, Giovanni Neglia
Monitoring, understanding, and optimizing the energy consumption of Machine Learning (ML) are various reasons why it is necessary to evaluate the energy usage of ML. However, there exists no universal tool that can answer this question for all use cases, and there may even be disagreement on how to evaluate energy consumption for a specific use case. Tools and methods are based on different approaches, each with their own advantages and drawbacks, and they need to be mapped out and explained in order to select the most suitable one for a given situation. We address this challenge through two approaches. First, we conduct a systematic literature review of all tools and methods that permit to evaluate the energy consumption of ML (both at training and at inference), irrespective of whether they were originally designed for machine learning or general software. Second, we develop and use an experimental protocol to compare a selection of these tools and methods. The comparison is both qualitative and quantitative on a range of ML tasks of different nature (vision, language) and computational complexity. The systematic literature review serves as a comprehensive guide for understanding the array of tools and methods used in evaluating energy consumption of ML, for various use cases going from basic energy monitoring to consumption optimization. Two open-source repositories are provided for further exploration. The first one contains tools that can be used to replicate this work or extend the current review. The second repository houses the experimental protocol, allowing users to augment the protocol with new ML computing tasks and additional energy evaluation tools.
Read more8/28/2024