IntelliExplain: Enhancing Interactive Code Generation through Natural Language Explanations for Non-Professional Programmers

Read original: arXiv:2405.10250 - Published 5/17/2024 by Hao Yan, Thomas D. Latoza, Ziyu Yao
Total Score

0

IntelliExplain: Enhancing Interactive Code Generation through Natural Language Explanations for Non-Professional Programmers

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper proposes IntelliExplain, a system that enhances interactive code generation by providing natural language explanations for non-professional programmers.
  • It leverages large language models to generate code and accompany it with explanations in plain language.
  • The goal is to make code generation more accessible and understandable for users without extensive programming experience.

Plain English Explanation

The IntelliExplain paper explores a new approach to making code generation more friendly and accessible for people who don't have a lot of programming expertise. The key idea is to use powerful large language models not just to generate the code, but also to provide plain-language explanations of what the code is doing and why.

The researchers recognized that while interactive code generation tools can be very helpful, the code output is often cryptic and hard for non-programmers to understand. By adding natural language explanations, the system can walk users through the reasoning behind the code, making it much easier for them to grasp and apply.

This approach has the potential to open up the power of code generation to a whole new audience - people who aren't fluent in programming but have ideas they want to bring to life. With IntelliExplain, the technical details are handled behind the scenes, while the user gets clear, jargon-free guidance on what the code is accomplishing and how it works.

Technical Explanation

The IntelliExplain paper presents a system that combines a large language model for code generation with an additional model trained to provide natural language explanations.

The code generation model takes in a natural language prompt from the user and outputs corresponding code. The explanation model then analyzes the generated code and generates a textual explanation that describes the code's functionality and purpose in plain language.

The researchers evaluated their approach through user studies, where they found that the natural language explanations significantly improved non-programmers' understanding and ability to use the generated code, compared to just presenting the code alone. Participants reported that the explanations helped them grasp the intent and inner workings of the code, reducing the barrier to adoption.

The paper also discusses potential future directions, such as incorporating explainability into the code generation process, learning conceptual knowledge to enhance the explanations, and exploring multimodal interfaces for a more seamless user experience.

Critical Analysis

The IntelliExplain paper presents a promising approach to making interactive code generation more accessible to non-professional programmers. By combining code generation with natural language explanations, the system addresses a key limitation of current tools, which can produce code that is difficult for non-experts to understand and apply.

One potential limitation discussed in the paper is the need to ensure the explanations generated by the system are consistently accurate and aligned with the code. Inaccurate or misleading explanations could undermine the system's usefulness and lead to user frustration. Ongoing research on improving the explainability of large language models may help address this challenge.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the scalability of the approach to increasingly complex code generation tasks. As the code becomes more sophisticated, generating clear and comprehensive natural language explanations may become more difficult. Further research is needed to understand the limitations and potential scaling issues of this approach.

Overall, the IntelliExplain system represents an important step towards democratizing code generation by making it more accessible to non-professional programmers. As the field of large language user interfaces continues to evolve, integrating natural language explanations into interactive code generation tools could have significant implications for fostering technological innovation and creativity among a wider audience.

Conclusion

The IntelliExplain paper presents a novel approach to enhancing interactive code generation by providing natural language explanations for non-professional programmers. By leveraging large language models to generate both code and accompanying textual descriptions, the system aims to make the code generation process more accessible and understandable for users without extensive programming experience.

The key insight of the research is that while code generation tools can be powerful, the complexity of the output code can be a significant barrier for non-experts. By adding natural language explanations that describe the code's functionality and purpose in plain language, IntelliExplain helps bridge this gap and empower a wider audience to harness the power of code generation.

As the field of large language user interfaces continues to evolve, the IntelliExplain approach represents an important step towards democratizing access to code generation and fostering technological innovation among diverse communities.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

IntelliExplain: Enhancing Interactive Code Generation through Natural Language Explanations for Non-Professional Programmers
Total Score

0

IntelliExplain: Enhancing Interactive Code Generation through Natural Language Explanations for Non-Professional Programmers

Hao Yan, Thomas D. Latoza, Ziyu Yao

Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited a strong promise in automatically generating executable code from natural language descriptions, particularly with interactive features that allow users to engage in the code-generation process by instructing the LLM with iterative feedback. However, existing interaction paradigms often assume that users have expert knowledge to debug source code and are not optimized for non-professional programmers' use. This raises challenges in making interactive code generation more accessible for individuals with varying levels of programming expertise. To tackle these challenges, we present IntelliExplain, which offers a novel human-LLM interaction paradigm to enhance non-professional programmers' experience by enabling them to interact with source code via natural language explanations. Users interact with IntelliExplain by providing natural language corrective feedback on errors they identify from the explanations. Feedback is used by the system to revise the code, until the user is satisfied with explanations by the system of the code. Our user study demonstrates that users with IntelliExplain achieve a significantly higher success rate 11.6% and 25.3% better than with vanilla GPT-3.5, while also requiring 39.0% and 15.6% less time in Text-to-SQL and Python code generation tasks, respectively.

Read more

5/17/2024

How Beginning Programmers and Code LLMs (Mis)read Each Other
Total Score

0

How Beginning Programmers and Code LLMs (Mis)read Each Other

Sydney Nguyen, Hannah McLean Babe, Yangtian Zi, Arjun Guha, Carolyn Jane Anderson, Molly Q Feldman

Generative AI models, specifically large language models (LLMs), have made strides towards the long-standing goal of text-to-code generation. This progress has invited numerous studies of user interaction. However, less is known about the struggles and strategies of non-experts, for whom each step of the text-to-code problem presents challenges: describing their intent in natural language, evaluating the correctness of generated code, and editing prompts when the generated code is incorrect. This paper presents a large-scale controlled study of how 120 beginning coders across three academic institutions approach writing and editing prompts. A novel experimental design allows us to target specific steps in the text-to-code process and reveals that beginners struggle with writing and editing prompts, even for problems at their skill level and when correctness is automatically determined. Our mixed-methods evaluation provides insight into student processes and perceptions with key implications for non-expert Code LLM use within and outside of education.

Read more

7/9/2024

NoviCode: Generating Programs from Natural Language Utterances by Novices
Total Score

0

NoviCode: Generating Programs from Natural Language Utterances by Novices

Asaf Achi Mordechai, Yoav Goldberg, Reut Tsarfaty

Current Text-to-Code models demonstrate impressive capabilities in generating executable code from natural language snippets. However, current studies focus on technical instructions and programmer-oriented language, and it is an open question whether these models can effectively translate natural language descriptions given by non-technical users and express complex goals, to an executable program that contains an intricate flow - composed of API access and control structures as loops, conditions, and sequences. To unlock the challenge of generating a complete program from a plain non-technical description we present NoviCode, a novel NL Programming task, which takes as input an API and a natural language description by a novice non-programmer and provides an executable program as output. To assess the efficacy of models on this task, we provide a novel benchmark accompanied by test suites wherein the generated program code is assessed not according to their form, but according to their functional execution. Our experiments show that, first, NoviCode is indeed a challenging task in the code synthesis domain, and that generating complex code from non-technical instructions goes beyond the current Text-to-Code paradigm. Second, we show that a novel approach wherein we align the NL utterances with the compositional hierarchical structure of the code, greatly enhances the performance of LLMs on this task, compared with the end-to-end Text-to-Code counterparts.

Read more

7/17/2024

💬

Total Score

2

NExT: Teaching Large Language Models to Reason about Code Execution

Ansong Ni, Miltiadis Allamanis, Arman Cohan, Yinlin Deng, Kensen Shi, Charles Sutton, Pengcheng Yin

A fundamental skill among human developers is the ability to understand and reason about program execution. As an example, a programmer can mentally simulate code execution in natural language to debug and repair code (aka. rubber duck debugging). However, large language models (LLMs) of code are typically trained on the surface textual form of programs, thus may lack a semantic understanding of how programs execute at run-time. To address this issue, we propose NExT, a method to teach LLMs to inspect the execution traces of programs (variable states of executed lines) and reason about their run-time behavior through chain-of-thought (CoT) rationales. Specifically, NExT uses self-training to bootstrap a synthetic training set of execution-aware rationales that lead to correct task solutions (e.g., fixed programs) without laborious manual annotation. Experiments on program repair tasks based on MBPP and HumanEval demonstrate that NExT improves the fix rate of a PaLM 2 model, by 26.1% and 14.3% absolute, respectively, with significantly improved rationale quality as verified by automated metrics and human raters. Our model can also generalize to scenarios where program traces are absent at test-time.

Read more

4/24/2024