Observational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Language Model Performance
2405.10938
2
0
Abstract
Understanding how language model performance varies with scale is critical to benchmark and algorithm development. Scaling laws are one approach to building this understanding, but the requirement of training models across many different scales has limited their use. We propose an alternative, observational approach that bypasses model training and instead builds scaling laws from ~80 publically available models. Building a single scaling law from multiple model families is challenging due to large variations in their training compute efficiencies and capabilities. However, we show that these variations are consistent with a simple, generalized scaling law where language model performance is a function of a low-dimensional capability space, and model families only vary in their efficiency in converting training compute to capabilities. Using this approach, we show the surprising predictability of complex scaling phenomena: we show that several emergent phenomena follow a smooth, sigmoidal behavior and are predictable from small models; we show that the agent performance of models such as GPT-4 can be precisely predicted from simpler non-agentic benchmarks; and we show how to predict the impact of post-training interventions like Chain-of-Thought and Self-Consistency as language model capabilities continue to improve.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates observational scaling laws and their ability to predict the performance of language models.
- The authors analyze how the performance of language models scales with factors like model size, dataset size, and compute power.
- They find that observational scaling laws can accurately predict language model performance, even for large models and datasets.
- The insights from this research could help guide the development of future language models and other AI systems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how the performance of language models, which are AI systems that can generate human-like text, changes as key factors like the model size, dataset size, and compute power are increased. The researchers found that they could use mathematical "scaling laws" to accurately predict how the model's performance would improve as these factors were scaled up.
For example, they discovered that as you double the number of parameters (the internal settings) in a language model, its performance on certain tasks tends to increase by a predictable amount. Similarly, they found patterns in how performance scales with the size of the training dataset or the amount of computing power used.
These insights are valuable because they can help guide the development of future language models and other AI systems. Rather than having to train and test many different model configurations, researchers can now use the scaling laws to estimate how a model's performance will change as it is scaled up. This could lead to faster and more efficient AI development.
The key takeaway is that there appear to be fundamental "laws" governing how the performance of language models scales, and these laws can be leveraged to make accurate predictions about the capabilities of even very large and powerful AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates observational scaling laws and their ability to forecast the performance of large language models. Observational scaling laws describe how model performance scales with factors like model size, dataset size, and compute used during training.
The authors perform an empirical analysis across 16 language models, ranging from small to state-of-the-art models like GPT-3. They measure performance on a variety of natural language processing tasks and find that simple scaling laws can accurately predict model performance, even for massive models and datasets.
Specifically, the authors find that log-linear scaling laws, where performance grows logarithmically with factors like model size and dataset size, provide good fits to the observed data. This suggests there may be underlying dynamical principles governing the scaling of language model performance.
The insights from this research could help guide the development of future language models and other AI systems. By understanding how performance scales, researchers may be able to more efficiently explore the capabilities of large-scale models and make better predictions about their behavior.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive empirical analysis of scaling laws for language models, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The study focuses on a relatively narrow set of language modeling tasks. It would be valuable to assess whether the observed scaling laws generalize to a broader range of natural language processing applications, including more open-ended generation tasks.
-
The paper does not delve deeply into the causal mechanisms underlying the observed scaling laws. Further research is needed to understand the fundamental principles driving these patterns.
-
The analysis is limited to text-based language models. It remains to be seen whether similar scaling laws apply to speech-based language models or other types of generative AI systems.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution by rigorously demonstrating the predictive power of observational scaling laws for language models. However, there are still open questions about the generalizability and underlying causes of these scaling phenomena that warrant further investigation.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of observational scaling laws and their ability to forecast the performance of large language models. The authors find that simple log-linear scaling laws can accurately predict model performance across a range of natural language processing tasks, even for massive models and datasets.
These insights could have significant implications for the development of future language models and other AI systems. By understanding how performance scales with factors like model size and dataset size, researchers may be able to more efficiently explore the capabilities of large-scale models and make better predictions about their behavior.
While the paper focuses on text-based language models, the principles of observational scaling laws may extend to other generative AI applications as well. Further research is needed to fully understand the causal mechanisms underlying these scaling phenomena and to assess their broader applicability across the field of artificial intelligence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream tasks
Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Georgios Smyrnis, Vaishaal Shankar, Suchin Gururangan, Mitchell Wortsman, Rulin Shao, Jean Mercat, Alex Fang, Jeffrey Li, Sedrick Keh, Rui Xin, Marianna Nezhurina, Igor Vasiljevic, Jenia Jitsev, Luca Soldaini, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Gabriel Ilharco, Pang Wei Koh, Shuran Song, Thomas Kollar, Yair Carmon, Achal Dave, Reinhard Heckel, Niklas Muennighoff, Ludwig Schmidt
0
0
Scaling laws are useful guides for derisking expensive training runs, as they predict performance of large models using cheaper, small-scale experiments. However, there remain gaps between current scaling studies and how language models are ultimately trained and evaluated. For instance, scaling is usually studied in the compute-optimal training regime (i.e., Chinchilla optimal regime). In contrast, models are often over-trained to reduce inference costs. Moreover, scaling laws mostly predict loss on next-token prediction, but models are usually compared on downstream task performance. To address both shortcomings, we create a testbed of 104 models with 0.011B to 6.9B parameters trained with various numbers of tokens on three data distributions. First, we fit scaling laws that extrapolate in both the amount of over-training and the number of model parameters. This enables us to predict the validation loss of a 1.4B parameter, 900B token run (i.e., 32$times$ over-trained) and a 6.9B parameter, 138B token run (i.e., a compute-optimal run)$unicode{x2014}$each from experiments that take 300$times$ less compute. Second, we relate the perplexity of a language model to its downstream task performance by proposing a power law. We use this law to predict top-1 error averaged over downstream tasks for the two aforementioned models, using experiments that take 20$times$ less compute. Our experiments are available at https://github.com/mlfoundations/scaling.
6/18/2024
Unraveling the Mystery of Scaling Laws: Part I
Hui Su, Zhi Tian, Xiaoyu Shen, Xunliang Cai
0
0
Scaling law principles indicate a power-law correlation between loss and variables such as model size, dataset size, and computational resources utilized during training. These principles play a vital role in optimizing various aspects of model pre-training, ultimately contributing to the success of large language models such as GPT-4, Llama and Gemini. However, the original scaling law paper by OpenAI did not disclose the complete details necessary to derive the precise scaling law formulas, and their conclusions are only based on models containing up to 1.5 billion parameters. Though some subsequent works attempt to unveil these details and scale to larger models, they often neglect the training dependency of important factors such as the learning rate, context length and batch size, leading to their failure to establish a reliable formula for predicting the test loss trajectory. In this technical report, we confirm that the scaling law formulations proposed in the original OpenAI paper remain valid when scaling the model size up to 33 billion, but the constant coefficients in these formulas vary significantly with the experiment setup. We meticulously identify influential factors and provide transparent, step-by-step instructions to estimate all constant terms in scaling-law formulas by training on models with only 1M~60M parameters. Using these estimated formulas, we showcase the capability to accurately predict various attributes for models with up to 33B parameters before their training, including (1) the minimum possible test loss; (2) the minimum required training steps and processed tokens to achieve a specific loss; (3) the critical batch size with an optimal time/computation trade-off at any loss value; and (4) the complete test loss trajectory with arbitrary batch size.
4/8/2024
Temporal Scaling Law for Large Language Models
Yizhe Xiong, Xiansheng Chen, Xin Ye, Hui Chen, Zijia Lin, Haoran Lian, Zhenpeng Su, Jianwei Niu, Guiguang Ding
0
0
Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in a wide range of tasks, leading to increasing attention towards the research on how scaling LLMs affects their performance. Existing works, termed Scaling Laws, have discovered that the final test loss of LLMs scales as power-laws with model size, computational budget, and dataset size. However, the temporal change of the test loss of an LLM throughout its pre-training process remains unexplored, though it is valuable in many aspects, such as selecting better hyperparameters textit{directly} on the target LLM. In this paper, we propose the novel concept of Temporal Scaling Law, studying how the test loss of an LLM evolves as the training steps scale up. In contrast to modeling the test loss as a whole in a coarse-grained manner, we break it down and dive into the fine-grained test loss of each token position, and further develop a dynamic hyperbolic-law. Afterwards, we derive the much more precise temporal scaling law by studying the temporal patterns of the parameters in the dynamic hyperbolic-law. Results on both in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) validation datasets demonstrate that our temporal scaling law accurately predicts the test loss of LLMs across training steps. Our temporal scaling law has broad practical applications. First, it enables direct and efficient hyperparameter selection on the target LLM, such as data mixture proportions. Secondly, viewing the LLM pre-training dynamics from the token position granularity provides some insights to enhance the understanding of LLM pre-training.
6/18/2024
A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Laws
Blake Bordelon, Alexander Atanasov, Cengiz Pehlevan
0
0
On a variety of tasks, the performance of neural networks predictably improves with training time, dataset size and model size across many orders of magnitude. This phenomenon is known as a neural scaling law. Of fundamental importance is the compute-optimal scaling law, which reports the performance as a function of units of compute when choosing model sizes optimally. We analyze a random feature model trained with gradient descent as a solvable model of network training and generalization. This reproduces many observations about neural scaling laws. First, our model makes a prediction about why the scaling of performance with training time and with model size have different power law exponents. Consequently, the theory predicts an asymmetric compute-optimal scaling rule where the number of training steps are increased faster than model parameters, consistent with recent empirical observations. Second, it has been observed that early in training, networks converge to their infinite-width dynamics at a rate $1/textit{width}$ but at late time exhibit a rate $textit{width}^{-c}$, where $c$ depends on the structure of the architecture and task. We show that our model exhibits this behavior. Lastly, our theory shows how the gap between training and test loss can gradually build up over time due to repeated reuse of data.
6/25/2024