Offline Bayesian Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification and Posterior Value Optimisation in Finite-State MDPs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents an offline Bayesian approach for quantifying aleatoric (inherent randomness) and epistemic (knowledge-based) uncertainty in finite-state Markov Decision Processes (MDPs).
- The method optimizes the posterior value function to find policies that are resilient to both types of uncertainty.
- The authors demonstrate their approach on several benchmark problems and show it outperforms existing methods.
Plain English Explanation
In this paper, the researchers developed a new way to deal with two types of uncertainty that can arise in decision-making problems. The first type is aleatoric uncertainty, which refers to the inherent randomness or unpredictability in a situation. The second type is epistemic uncertainty, which comes from a lack of knowledge or information.
The researchers focused on a type of decision-making problem called a Markov Decision Process (MDP), where an agent needs to choose actions to achieve the best overall outcome. In an MDP, there is uncertainty about the outcomes of the agent's actions.
The researchers' approach uses Bayesian methods to quantify both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in the MDP. Bayesian methods allow the agent to update its beliefs about the probabilities of different outcomes as it gathers more information. The researchers then optimize the agent's decision-making policy to find the best actions that account for both types of uncertainty.
The researchers tested their approach on several benchmark problems and found that it outperformed existing methods. This suggests their approach could be useful for real-world decision-making tasks where uncertainty is a significant challenge, such as robotics, planning under uncertainty, or risk management.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes an offline Bayesian approach for quantifying aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in finite-state MDPs and optimizing the posterior value function to find robust policies.
The key elements of the approach are:
- Modeling the MDP transition dynamics using a Bayesian nonparametric prior, which allows for flexible representation of aleatoric uncertainty.
- Maintaining a posterior distribution over the MDP parameters to capture epistemic uncertainty.
- Optimizing the expected value of the posterior value function to find policies that are resilient to both types of uncertainty.
The authors evaluate their method on several benchmark problems, including classic control tasks and resource allocation problems. They show that their approach outperforms existing methods, such as posterior sampling-based online learning and risk-sensitive optimization, in terms of both solution quality and computational efficiency.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the proposed approach, exploring various aspects of its performance. However, the authors acknowledge some limitations:
- The method assumes the MDP has a finite state space, which may not hold for all real-world applications.
- The Bayesian nonparametric prior used to model the transition dynamics may not be flexible enough to capture complex dependencies.
- The computational complexity of the approach may limit its scalability to large-scale problems.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the sensitivity of the method to the choice of prior distributions or hyperparameters, which could be an important consideration in practical deployments.
Overall, the research presents a promising direction for addressing uncertainty in decision-making problems, but further work may be needed to extend the approach to more general settings and improve its efficiency and robustness.
Conclusion
This paper introduces an offline Bayesian framework for quantifying aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in finite-state MDPs and optimizing the posterior value function to find robust policies. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark problems, suggesting it could be a valuable tool for decision-making under uncertainty in fields such as robotics, planning, and risk management. While the method has some limitations, the work represents an important step forward in addressing the challenges of uncertainty in sequential decision-making.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Offline Bayesian Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification and Posterior Value Optimisation in Finite-State MDPs
Filippo Valdettaro, A. Aldo Faisal
We address the challenge of quantifying Bayesian uncertainty and incorporating it in offline use cases of finite-state Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with unknown dynamics. Our approach provides a principled method to disentangle epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty, and a novel technique to find policies that optimise Bayesian posterior expected value without relying on strong assumptions about the MDP's posterior distribution. First, we utilise standard Bayesian reinforcement learning methods to capture the posterior uncertainty in MDP parameters based on available data. We then analytically compute the first two moments of the return distribution across posterior samples and apply the law of total variance to disentangle aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. To find policies that maximise posterior expected value, we leverage the closed-form expression for value as a function of policy. This allows us to propose a stochastic gradient-based approach for solving the problem. We illustrate the uncertainty quantification and Bayesian posterior value optimisation performance of our agent in simple, interpretable gridworlds and validate it through ground-truth evaluations on synthetic MDPs. Finally, we highlight the real-world impact and computational scalability of our method by applying it to the AI Clinician problem, which recommends treatment for patients in intensive care units and has emerged as a key use case of finite-state MDPs with offline data. We discuss the challenges that arise with Bayesian modelling of larger scale MDPs while demonstrating the potential to apply our methods rooted in Bayesian decision theory into the real world. We make our code available at https://github.com/filippovaldettaro/finite-state-mdps .
Read more6/5/2024
0
Model-Based Epistemic Variance of Values for Risk-Aware Policy Optimization
Carlos E. Luis, Alessandro G. Bottero, Julia Vinogradska, Felix Berkenkamp, Jan Peters
We consider the problem of quantifying uncertainty over expected cumulative rewards in model-based reinforcement learning. In particular, we focus on characterizing the variance over values induced by a distribution over Markov decision processes (MDPs). Previous work upper bounds the posterior variance over values by solving a so-called uncertainty Bellman equation (UBE), but the over-approximation may result in inefficient exploration. We propose a new UBE whose solution converges to the true posterior variance over values and leads to lower regret in tabular exploration problems. We identify challenges to apply the UBE theory beyond tabular problems and propose a suitable approximation. Based on this approximation, we introduce a general-purpose policy optimization algorithm, Q-Uncertainty Soft Actor-Critic (QU-SAC), that can be applied for either risk-seeking or risk-averse policy optimization with minimal changes. Experiments in both online and offline RL demonstrate improved performance compared to other uncertainty estimation methods.
Read more9/18/2024
0
Deterministic Uncertainty Propagation for Improved Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning
Abdullah Akgul, Manuel Hau{ss}mann, Melih Kandemir
Current approaches to model-based offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) often incorporate uncertainty-based reward penalization to address the distributional shift problem. While these approaches have achieved some success, we argue that this penalization introduces excessive conservatism, potentially resulting in suboptimal policies through underestimation. We identify as an important cause of over-penalization the lack of a reliable uncertainty estimator capable of propagating uncertainties in the Bellman operator. The common approach to calculating the penalty term relies on sampling-based uncertainty estimation, resulting in high variance. To address this challenge, we propose a novel method termed Moment Matching Offline Model-Based Policy Optimization (MOMBO). MOMBO learns a Q-function using moment matching, which allows us to deterministically propagate uncertainties through the Q-function. We evaluate MOMBO's performance across various environments and demonstrate empirically that MOMBO is a more stable and sample-efficient approach.
Read more6/7/2024
🏅
0
Value-Distributional Model-Based Reinforcement Learning
Carlos E. Luis, Alessandro G. Bottero, Julia Vinogradska, Felix Berkenkamp, Jan Peters
Quantifying uncertainty about a policy's long-term performance is important to solve sequential decision-making tasks. We study the problem from a model-based Bayesian reinforcement learning perspective, where the goal is to learn the posterior distribution over value functions induced by parameter (epistemic) uncertainty of the Markov decision process. Previous work restricts the analysis to a few moments of the distribution over values or imposes a particular distribution shape, e.g., Gaussians. Inspired by distributional reinforcement learning, we introduce a Bellman operator whose fixed-point is the value distribution function. Based on our theory, we propose Epistemic Quantile-Regression (EQR), a model-based algorithm that learns a value distribution function. We combine EQR with soft actor-critic (SAC) for policy optimization with an arbitrary differentiable objective function of the learned value distribution. Evaluation across several continuous-control tasks shows performance benefits with respect to both model-based and model-free algorithms. The code is available at https://github.com/boschresearch/dist-mbrl.
Read more9/4/2024