Open Artificial Knowledge

Read original: arXiv:2407.14371 - Published 7/22/2024 by Vadim Borisov, Richard H. Schreiber
Total Score

0

Open Artificial Knowledge

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Introduces the concept of Open Artificial Knowledge (OAK), a dataset aimed at addressing key challenges in artificial data
  • Discusses the limitations of current AI training data and the need for more diverse, representative, and ethical datasets
  • Presents the OAK dataset as a potential solution, providing a comprehensive overview of its design and content

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses the development of the Open Artificial Knowledge (OAK) dataset, which is designed to address some of the key challenges associated with the data used to train AI systems. Current AI training data often lacks diversity, representativeness, and ethical considerations, which can lead to biased and unethical AI models.

The OAK dataset aims to provide a more comprehensive and inclusive set of data for training AI systems. It includes a wide range of information, such as textual data, images, and audio, covering diverse topics and perspectives. The goal is to create a dataset that better reflects the complexity and diversity of the real world, helping to develop AI models that are more accurate, fair, and ethical.

By using the OAK dataset, researchers and developers can train AI systems that are less prone to exhibiting biases or making unethical decisions. This is a crucial step in ensuring that AI technology is developed and deployed in a responsible and beneficial manner, serving the needs of all members of society.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the OAK dataset, which is designed to address key challenges in the creation and use of artificial data for AI training. The authors identify several limitations of current AI training data, including a lack of diversity, representativeness, and consideration for ethical implications.

To address these issues, the OAK dataset was designed with the following features:

  1. Diverse Content: The dataset includes a wide range of data types, such as text, images, and audio, covering a variety of topics and perspectives.
  2. Representational Fairness: The data is carefully curated to ensure that it reflects the diversity of the real world, including underrepresented groups and perspectives.
  3. Ethical Considerations: The dataset incorporates guidelines and mechanisms to promote the ethical use of the data, such as the inclusion of information on potential biases and the consideration of privacy and consent.

The paper provides a detailed overview of the OAK dataset, including its data sources, curation processes, and the specific challenges it aims to address. The authors also discuss the potential applications of the dataset in training more accurate, fair, and ethical AI systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling case for the need to develop more comprehensive and ethical AI training datasets, such as the OAK dataset. The authors have identified important limitations in current AI training data and have proposed a thoughtful approach to addressing these challenges.

One potential area for further research is the evaluation of the OAK dataset's impact on the performance and fairness of AI models trained using it. While the authors have outlined the dataset's design principles, it would be valuable to see empirical evidence of its effectiveness in real-world applications.

Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the specific ethical considerations and guidelines incorporated into the OAK dataset. Providing more details on the ethical framework and its implementation would help readers better understand the dataset's approach to promoting responsible AI development.

Overall, the paper is a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion around the importance of ethical and inclusive AI data. The OAK dataset represents an important step towards addressing the critical challenges in this area.

Conclusion

The paper introduces the Open Artificial Knowledge (OAK) dataset, which aims to address key challenges in the use of artificial data for training AI systems. The OAK dataset is designed to be more diverse, representative, and ethical than traditional AI training data, with the goal of promoting the development of accurate, fair, and responsible AI technology.

By using the OAK dataset, researchers and developers can train AI models that are less prone to exhibiting biases or making unethical decisions, which is crucial for ensuring that AI is deployed in a way that benefits all members of society. The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the dataset's design and the challenges it seeks to address, making a strong case for the importance of ethical and inclusive AI data.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Open Artificial Knowledge
Total Score

0

Open Artificial Knowledge

Vadim Borisov, Richard H. Schreiber

The tremendous success of chat-based AI systems like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini stems from Large Language Models (LLMs) trained on vast amount of datasets. However, acquiring high-quality, diverse, and ethically sourced training data remains a significant challenge. We introduce the Open Artificial Knowledge (OAK) dataset, a large-scale resource of over 500 million tokens (at the moment of writing) designed to address this issue. OAK leverages an ensemble of state-of-the-art LLMs, including GPT4o, LLaMa3-70B, LLaMa3-8B, Mixtral-8x7B, Gemma-7B, and Gemma-2-9B , to generate high-quality text across diverse domains, guided by Wikipedia's main categories. Our methodology ensures broad knowledge coverage while maintaining coherence and factual accuracy. The OAK dataset aims to foster the development of more capable and aligned language models while addressing critical issues of data scarcity and privacy in LLM training, and it is freely available on www.oakdataset.org.

Read more

7/22/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

Tagengo: A Multilingual Chat Dataset

Peter Devine

Open source large language models (LLMs) have shown great improvements in recent times. However, many of these models are focused solely on popular spoken languages. We present a high quality dataset of more than 70k prompt-response pairs in 74 languages which consist of human generated prompts and synthetic responses. We use this dataset to train a state-of-the-art open source English LLM to chat multilingually. We evaluate our model on MT-Bench chat benchmarks in 6 languages, finding that our multilingual model outperforms previous state-of-the-art open source LLMs across each language. We further find that training on more multilingual data is beneficial to the performance in a chosen target language (Japanese) compared to simply training on only data in that language. These results indicate the necessity of training on large amounts of high quality multilingual data to make a more accessible LLM.

Read more

5/22/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Using Large Language Models to Generate Authentic Multi-agent Knowledge Work Datasets

Desiree Heim, Christian Jilek, Adrian Ulges, Andreas Dengel

Current publicly available knowledge work data collections lack diversity, extensive annotations, and contextual information about the users and their documents. These issues hinder objective and comparable data-driven evaluations and optimizations of knowledge work assistance systems. Due to the considerable resources needed to collect such data in real-life settings and the necessity of data censorship, collecting such a dataset appears nearly impossible. For this reason, we propose a configurable, multi-agent knowledge work dataset generator. This system simulates collaborative knowledge work among agents producing Large Language Model-generated documents and accompanying data traces. Additionally, the generator captures all background information, given in its configuration or created during the simulation process, in a knowledge graph. Finally, the resulting dataset can be utilized and shared without privacy or confidentiality concerns. This paper introduces our approach's design and vision and focuses on generating authentic knowledge work documents using Large Language Models. Our study involving human raters who assessed 53% of the generated and 74% of the real documents as realistic demonstrates the potential of our approach. Furthermore, we analyze the authenticity criteria mentioned in the participants' comments and elaborate on potential improvements for identified common issues.

Read more

9/9/2024

The Battle of LLMs: A Comparative Study in Conversational QA Tasks
Total Score

0

The Battle of LLMs: A Comparative Study in Conversational QA Tasks

Aryan Rangapur, Aman Rangapur

Large language models have gained considerable interest for their impressive performance on various tasks. Within this domain, ChatGPT and GPT-4, developed by OpenAI, and the Gemini, developed by Google, have emerged as particularly popular among early adopters. Additionally, Mixtral by Mistral AI and Claude by Anthropic are newly released, further expanding the landscape of advanced language models. These models are viewed as disruptive technologies with applications spanning customer service, education, healthcare, and finance. More recently, Mistral has entered the scene, captivating users with its unique ability to generate creative content. Understanding the perspectives of these users is crucial, as they can offer valuable insights into the potential strengths, weaknesses, and overall success or failure of these technologies in various domains. This research delves into the responses generated by ChatGPT, GPT-4, Gemini, Mixtral and Claude across different Conversational QA corpora. Evaluation scores were meticulously computed and subsequently compared to ascertain the overall performance of these models. Our study pinpointed instances where these models provided inaccurate answers to questions, offering insights into potential areas where they might be susceptible to errors. In essence, this research provides a comprehensive comparison and evaluation of these state of-the-art language models, shedding light on their capabilities while also highlighting potential areas for improvement

Read more

5/29/2024