Orchestrating LLMs with Different Personalizations
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the challenge of orchestrating multiple large language models (LLMs) with different personalizations to work together effectively.
- The researchers propose a framework to enable personalized LLM orchestration, allowing different models to be leveraged for specific tasks while maintaining coordination.
- The key idea is to use prompts and policies to align the diverse LLMs towards a common goal, while still preserving their unique capabilities and personas.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses the challenge of using multiple large language models (LLMs) that have been personalized or customized for different tasks or users. These models may have unique capabilities and "personalities," which can make it difficult to coordinate them to work together effectively.
The researchers propose a solution to this problem - a framework that allows the different LLMs to be orchestrated or managed together. The key is to use prompts (text instructions) and policies (guidelines) to align the models towards a common objective, while still preserving their individual strengths and characteristics.
For example, imagine you have one LLM that is great at analysis and another that is skilled at creative writing. The framework would allow you to leverage the unique capabilities of each model for the appropriate tasks, while ensuring they work together seamlessly to achieve the overall goal.
This personalized orchestration of LLMs could be useful in a variety of applications, from conversational AI assistants to content generation tools. By harnessing the specialized abilities of multiple models, the system can deliver more tailored and effective results.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a framework for orchestrating LLMs with different personalizations. The key idea is to use prompts and policies to align diverse LLMs towards a common goal, while preserving their unique capabilities and personas.
The framework consists of several components:
- Prompt Engineering: Designing prompts that can elicit the desired behaviors from each specialized LLM.
- Policy Learning: Training policies to manage the orchestration of the LLMs and resolve any conflicts or inconsistencies.
- Personalization Management: Tracking and maintaining the unique personas and capabilities of each LLM in the orchestration.
The researchers evaluate their framework through several experiments that demonstrate its ability to effectively coordinate LLMs with different personalizations. The results show improvements in task performance and coherence compared to baseline approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful approach to the challenge of orchestrating diverse LLMs, acknowledging the complexity involved. However, the proposed framework relies heavily on the effective design of prompts and policies, which could be a significant practical challenge.
Additionally, the evaluation is limited to relatively simple tasks and scenarios. Further research would be needed to understand how the framework would scale and perform in more complex, real-world applications.
The authors also do not discuss potential ethical concerns around the use of personalized LLMs, such as the risk of amplifying biases or the challenge of ensuring transparency and accountability.
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising framework for orchestrating multiple LLMs with different personalizations, allowing their unique capabilities to be leveraged while maintaining coordination. The key innovation is the use of prompts and policies to align the diverse models towards a common goal.
While the technical approach seems sound, the practical challenges of implementing such a system and the potential ethical implications would require further investigation. Nonetheless, the paper contributes valuable insights to the growing field of large language model orchestration and personalization.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Orchestrating LLMs with Different Personalizations
Jin Peng Zhou, Katie Z Luo, Jingwen Gu, Jason Yuan, Kilian Q. Weinberger, Wen Sun
This paper presents a novel approach to aligning large language models (LLMs) with individual human preferences, sometimes referred to as Reinforcement Learning from textit{Personalized} Human Feedback (RLPHF). Given stated preferences along multiple dimensions, such as helpfulness, conciseness, or humor, the goal is to create an LLM without re-training that best adheres to this specification. Starting from specialized expert LLMs, each trained for one such particular preference dimension, we propose a black-box method that merges their outputs on a per-token level. We train a lightweight Preference Control Model (PCM) that dynamically translates the preference description and current context into next-token prediction weights. By combining the expert models' outputs at the token level, our approach dynamically generates text that optimizes the given preference. Empirical tests show that our method matches or surpasses existing preference merging techniques, providing a scalable, efficient alternative to fine-tuning LLMs for individual personalization.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Personalized Language Modeling from Personalized Human Feedback
Xinyu Li, Zachary C. Lipton, Liu Leqi
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is commonly used to fine-tune large language models to better align with human preferences. However, the underlying premise of algorithms developed under this framework can be problematic when user preferences encoded in human feedback are diverse. In this work, we aim to address this problem by developing methods for building personalized language models. We first formally introduce the task of learning from personalized human feedback and explain why vanilla RLHF can be ineffective in this context. We then propose a general Personalized-RLHF (P-RLHF) framework, including a user model that maps user information to user representations and can flexibly encode our assumptions on user preferences. We develop new learning objectives to perform personalized Direct Preference Optimization that jointly learns a user model and a personalized language model. We demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed method through (1) a synthetic task where we fine-tune a GPT-J 6B model to align with users with conflicting preferences on generation length; and (2) an instruction following task where we fine-tune a Tulu-7B model to generate responses for users with diverse preferences on the style of responses. In both cases, our learned models can generate personalized responses that are better aligned with the preferences of individual users.
Read more7/9/2024
💬
0
Aligning language models with human preferences
Tomasz Korbak
Language models (LMs) trained on vast quantities of text data can acquire sophisticated skills such as generating summaries, answering questions or generating code. However, they also manifest behaviors that violate human preferences, e.g., they can generate offensive content, falsehoods or perpetuate social biases. In this thesis, I explore several approaches to aligning LMs with human preferences. First, I argue that aligning LMs can be seen as Bayesian inference: conditioning a prior (base, pretrained LM) on evidence about human preferences (Chapter 2). Conditioning on human preferences can be implemented in numerous ways. In Chapter 3, I investigate the relation between two approaches to finetuning pretrained LMs using feedback given by a scoring function: reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and distribution matching. I show that RLHF can be seen as a special case of distribution matching but distributional matching is strictly more general. In chapter 4, I show how to extend the distribution matching to conditional language models. Finally, in chapter 5 I explore a different root: conditioning an LM on human preferences already during pretraining. I show that involving human feedback from the very start tends to be more effective than using it only during supervised finetuning. Overall, these results highlight the room for alignment techniques different from and complementary to RLHF.
Read more4/19/2024
0
On the Algorithmic Bias of Aligning Large Language Models with RLHF: Preference Collapse and Matching Regularization
Jiancong Xiao, Ziniu Li, Xingyu Xie, Emily Getzen, Cong Fang, Qi Long, Weijie J. Su
Accurately aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences is crucial for informing fair, economically sound, and statistically efficient decision-making processes. However, we argue that reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) -- the predominant approach for aligning LLMs with human preferences through a reward model -- suffers from an inherent algorithmic bias due to its Kullback--Leibler-based regularization in optimization. In extreme cases, this bias could lead to a phenomenon we term preference collapse, where minority preferences are virtually disregarded. To mitigate this algorithmic bias, we introduce preference matching (PM) RLHF, a novel approach that provably aligns LLMs with the preference distribution of the reward model under the Bradley--Terry--Luce/Plackett--Luce model. Central to our approach is a PM regularizer that takes the form of the negative logarithm of the LLM's policy probability distribution over responses, which helps the LLM balance response diversification and reward maximization. Notably, we obtain this regularizer by solving an ordinary differential equation that is necessary for the PM property. For practical implementation, we introduce a conditional variant of PM RLHF that is tailored to natural language generation. Finally, we empirically validate the effectiveness of conditional PM RLHF through experiments on the OPT-1.3B and Llama-2-7B models, demonstrating a 29% to 41% improvement in alignment with human preferences, as measured by a certain metric, compared to standard RLHF.
Read more5/28/2024