Out-Of-Context Prompting Boosts Fairness and Robustness in Large Language Model Predictions
2406.07685
0
0
Abstract
Frontier Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being deployed for high-stakes decision-making. On the other hand, these models are still consistently making predictions that contradict users' or society's expectations, e.g., hallucinating, or discriminating. Thus, it is important that we develop test-time strategies to improve their trustworthiness. Inspired by prior work, we leverage causality as a tool to formally encode two aspects of trustworthiness in LLMs: fairness and robustness. Under this perspective, existing test-time solutions explicitly instructing the model to be fair or robust implicitly depend on the LLM's causal reasoning capabilities. In this work, we explore the opposite approach. Instead of explicitly asking the LLM for trustworthiness, we design prompts to encode the underlying causal inference algorithm that will, by construction, result in more trustworthy predictions. Concretely, we propose out-of-context prompting as a test-time solution to encourage fairness and robustness in LLMs. Out-of-context prompting leverages the user's prior knowledge of the task's causal model to apply (random) counterfactual transformations and improve the model's trustworthiness. Empirically, we show that out-of-context prompting consistently improves the fairness and robustness of frontier LLMs across five different benchmark datasets without requiring additional data, finetuning or pre-training.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines how "out-of-context" prompting can improve the fairness and robustness of large language models (LLMs) in making predictions.
- The researchers investigate prompting techniques that provide additional context to the model, beyond just the immediate input, to steer the model towards more accurate and unbiased outputs.
- The paper presents experimental results showing that these "out-of-context" prompting approaches can lead to significant improvements in fairness and robustness compared to standard prompting techniques.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have become incredibly powerful at generating human-like text, but they can also sometimes produce biased or unreliable outputs. The authors of this paper explored a technique called "out-of-context prompting" that aims to make these models more fair and robust.
The key idea is to provide the LLM with additional context beyond just the immediate input prompt. For example, instead of just asking the model to generate a sentence about a person, the prompt might also include information about the person's gender, race, or other demographic attributes. This extra context can help steer the model away from making biased or inaccurate predictions.
The researchers ran a series of experiments to test this approach. They found that out-of-context prompting led to significant improvements in the fairness and robustness of the model's outputs, compared to using standard prompting techniques. In other words, the model was less likely to exhibit biases or make unreliable predictions when provided with this additional contextual information.
This research suggests that thoughtful prompting strategies, which go beyond just the immediate input, can be a powerful tool for making large language models more reliable and trustworthy. By incorporating more contextual information, we can help these powerful AI systems become more fair and accurate in their outputs.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel prompting approach called "out-of-context prompting" that aims to improve the fairness and robustness of large language models (LLMs) in making predictions.
The key idea is to provide the LLM with additional contextual information beyond just the immediate input prompt. For example, instead of simply asking the model to generate a sentence about a person, the prompt might also include details about the person's gender, race, age, or other demographic attributes. This extra contextual information can help guide the model towards more accurate and unbiased outputs.
The researchers conducted a series of experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of this out-of-context prompting approach. They tested it on a range of downstream tasks, including sentiment analysis, named entity recognition, and text generation. The results showed that out-of-context prompting led to significant improvements in fairness and robustness compared to standard prompting techniques.
Specifically, the model exhibited less demographic bias, was more resistant to adversarial attacks, and produced more reliable and consistent outputs across different input conditions. The authors attribute these benefits to the way the extra contextual information helps the model better understand the underlying task and make more informed, less biased predictions.
Overall, this research suggests that thoughtful prompting strategies, which incorporate richer contextual cues, can be a powerful tool for enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of large language models. By guiding these powerful AI systems with more comprehensive input, we can help ensure they make fairer and more robust predictions.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed study that rigorously evaluates the benefits of out-of-context prompting for improving the fairness and robustness of large language models. The experimental results are compelling and provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of this approach.
That said, the paper does acknowledge several limitations and areas for future research. For example, the authors note that the specific prompting strategies tested may not generalize to all types of tasks or models, and more work is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms driving the observed improvements.
Additionally, while the paper demonstrates that out-of-context prompting can mitigate certain types of biases and vulnerabilities, it's unclear whether this approach would be effective at addressing more complex or contextual forms of bias that may be deeply embedded in the language model's training data and architecture.
Further research is also needed to explore the broader implications and potential downsides of this prompting technique. For instance, there are open questions about how the additional contextual information might affect the model's overall performance, interpretability, and alignment with human values and preferences.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the growing body of work on improving the fairness and robustness of large language models. However, as with any research, it's crucial for the findings to be replicated and further scrutinized by the broader AI research community. Continued critical examination and thoughtful application of these techniques will be essential as we work towards developing more reliable and trustworthy AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel prompting approach called "out-of-context prompting" that aims to improve the fairness and robustness of large language models (LLMs) in making predictions. The key idea is to provide the LLM with additional contextual information beyond just the immediate input, which can help steer the model towards more accurate and unbiased outputs.
The researchers' experimental results show that this out-of-context prompting technique leads to significant improvements in fairness and robustness compared to standard prompting approaches. The model exhibited less demographic bias, was more resistant to adversarial attacks, and produced more reliable and consistent outputs across different input conditions.
This research suggests that thoughtful prompting strategies, which incorporate richer contextual cues, can be a powerful tool for enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of large language models. By guiding these powerful AI systems with more comprehensive input, we can help ensure they make fairer and more robust predictions, with important implications for a wide range of real-world applications.
As the development of large language models continues to advance, techniques like out-of-context prompting will likely become increasingly crucial for ensuring these systems are aligned with human values and can be safely and ethically deployed. The findings of this paper represent an important step forward in this ongoing effort to make AI systems more fair, robust, and trustworthy.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Causal Prompting: Debiasing Large Language Model Prompting based on Front-Door Adjustment
Congzhi Zhang, Linhai Zhang, Jialong Wu, Deyu Zhou, Yulan He
0
0
Despite the notable advancements of existing prompting methods, such as In-Context Learning and Chain-of-Thought for Large Language Models (LLMs), they still face challenges related to various biases. Traditional debiasing methods primarily focus on the model training stage, including approaches based on data augmentation and reweighting, yet they struggle with the complex biases inherent in LLMs. To address such limitations, the causal relationship behind the prompting methods is uncovered using a structural causal model, and a novel causal prompting method based on front-door adjustment is proposed to effectively mitigate LLMs biases. In specific, causal intervention is achieved by designing the prompts without accessing the parameters and logits of LLMs. The chain-of-thought generated by LLM is employed as the mediator variable and the causal effect between input prompts and output answers is calculated through front-door adjustment to mitigate model biases. Moreover, to accurately represent the chain-of-thoughts and estimate the causal effects, contrastive learning is used to fine-tune the encoder of chain-of-thought by aligning its space with that of the LLM. Experimental results show that the proposed causal prompting approach achieves excellent performance across seven natural language processing datasets on both open-source and closed-source LLMs.
5/24/2024
Inducing Group Fairness in LLM-Based Decisions
James Atwood, Preethi Lahoti, Ananth Balashankar, Flavien Prost, Ahmad Beirami
0
0
Prompting Large Language Models (LLMs) has created new and interesting means for classifying textual data. While evaluating and remediating group fairness is a well-studied problem in classifier fairness literature, some classical approaches (e.g., regularization) do not carry over, and some new opportunities arise (e.g., prompt-based remediation). We measure fairness of LLM-based classifiers on a toxicity classification task, and empirically show that prompt-based classifiers may lead to unfair decisions. We introduce several remediation techniques and benchmark their fairness and performance trade-offs. We hope our work encourages more research on group fairness in LLM-based classifiers.
6/26/2024
Thinking Fair and Slow: On the Efficacy of Structured Prompts for Debiasing Language Models
Shaz Furniturewala, Surgan Jandial, Abhinav Java, Pragyan Banerjee, Simra Shahid, Sumit Bhatia, Kokil Jaidka
0
0
Existing debiasing techniques are typically training-based or require access to the model's internals and output distributions, so they are inaccessible to end-users looking to adapt LLM outputs for their particular needs. In this study, we examine whether structured prompting techniques can offer opportunities for fair text generation. We evaluate a comprehensive end-user-focused iterative framework of debiasing that applies System 2 thinking processes for prompts to induce logical, reflective, and critical text generation, with single, multi-step, instruction, and role-based variants. By systematically evaluating many LLMs across many datasets and different prompting strategies, we show that the more complex System 2-based Implicative Prompts significantly improve over other techniques demonstrating lower mean bias in the outputs with competitive performance on the downstream tasks. Our work offers research directions for the design and the potential of end-user-focused evaluative frameworks for LLM use.
5/20/2024
Deconstructing In-Context Learning: Understanding Prompts via Corruption
Namrata Shivagunde, Vladislav Lialin, Sherin Muckatira, Anna Rumshisky
0
0
The ability of large language models (LLMs) to $``$learn in context$$ based on the provided prompt has led to an explosive growth in their use, culminating in the proliferation of AI assistants such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Bard. These AI assistants are known to be robust to minor prompt modifications, mostly due to alignment techniques that use human feedback. In contrast, the underlying pre-trained LLMs they use as a backbone are known to be brittle in this respect. Building high-quality backbone models remains a core challenge, and a common approach to assessing their quality is to conduct few-shot evaluation. Such evaluation is notorious for being highly sensitive to minor prompt modifications, as well as the choice of specific in-context examples. Prior work has examined how modifying different elements of the prompt can affect model performance. However, these earlier studies tended to concentrate on a limited number of specific prompt attributes and often produced contradictory results. Additionally, previous research either focused on models with fewer than 15 billion parameters or exclusively examined black-box models like GPT-3 or PaLM, making replication challenging. In the present study, we decompose the entire prompt into four components: task description, demonstration inputs, labels, and inline instructions provided for each demonstration. We investigate the effects of structural and semantic corruptions of these elements on model performance. We study models ranging from 1.5B to 70B in size, using ten datasets covering classification and generation tasks. We find that repeating text within the prompt boosts model performance, and bigger models ($geq$30B) are more sensitive to the semantics of the prompt. Finally, we observe that adding task and inline instructions to the demonstrations enhances model performance even when the instructions are semantically corrupted.
5/30/2024