Out-of-Distribution Learning with Human Feedback

Read original: arXiv:2408.07772 - Published 8/16/2024 by Haoyue Bai, Xuefeng Du, Katie Rainey, Shibin Parameswaran, Yixuan Li
Total Score

0

Out-of-Distribution Learning with Human Feedback

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper presents a novel approach for out-of-distribution (OOD) learning with human feedback.
  • Key ideas include using human feedback to improve OOD detection, leveraging OOD examples to fine-tune the model, and maintaining safety during OOD learning.
  • Experiments show the proposed method outperforms existing OOD detection and robust learning techniques.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores a new way to help AI systems learn about things that are outside of their normal training data. This is an important problem because AI models can sometimes make mistakes or behave unexpectedly when they encounter data that is very different from what they were trained on.

The key innovation is to get human feedback to help the AI system identify examples that are outside of its normal distribution. The system can then use these out-of-distribution examples to fine-tune and improve its performance, while also maintaining safety by avoiding problematic behaviors.

The researchers show through experiments that this approach outperforms other OOD detection and robust learning techniques. The key insight is that human feedback can provide valuable signals to help the AI system better understand the limits of its knowledge and adapt accordingly.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a new framework for out-of-distribution (OOD) learning with human feedback. The key components are:

  1. OOD Detection: The model is trained to detect OOD examples using a combination of self-supervised and human-provided labels.
  2. OOD Fine-tuning: When OOD examples are detected, the model fine-tunes on these examples to improve its OOD generalization.
  3. Safety Constraints: During fine-tuning, the model is constrained to maintain safety and avoid problematic behavior on in-distribution data.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through extensive experiments on benchmark OOD detection and robust learning tasks. They show that the proposed method outperforms existing techniques, highlighting the value of human feedback in guiding the model's OOD learning.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to OOD learning that leverages human feedback to address key challenges. However, a few potential limitations and areas for further research are worth noting:

  1. Scalability and Annotation Cost: Relying on human feedback may limit scalability, as obtaining labeled OOD examples could become costly and time-consuming for large-scale applications.
  2. Generalization to Diverse OOD Distributions: The experiments focus on relatively simple OOD distributions, and it's unclear how well the approach would generalize to more complex and diverse OOD scenarios.
  3. Interpretability and Explainability: The paper does not address how the model's OOD detection and fine-tuning decisions can be made interpretable and explainable to users.

Further research could explore ways to reduce annotation costs, improve generalization to diverse OOD distributions, and enhance the interpretability of the OOD learning process.

Conclusion

This paper presents an innovative approach to out-of-distribution learning that leverages human feedback to improve OOD detection, fine-tune the model on OOD examples, and maintain safety. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of this method, highlighting the value of human guidance in helping AI systems better understand and adapt to the limits of their knowledge. While the approach has some potential limitations, it represents an important step forward in addressing the challenges of OOD learning and could have significant implications for the development of more robust and reliable AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Out-of-Distribution Learning with Human Feedback
Total Score

0

Out-of-Distribution Learning with Human Feedback

Haoyue Bai, Xuefeng Du, Katie Rainey, Shibin Parameswaran, Yixuan Li

Out-of-distribution (OOD) learning often relies heavily on statistical approaches or predefined assumptions about OOD data distributions, hindering their efficacy in addressing multifaceted challenges of OOD generalization and OOD detection in real-world deployment environments. This paper presents a novel framework for OOD learning with human feedback, which can provide invaluable insights into the nature of OOD shifts and guide effective model adaptation. Our framework capitalizes on the freely available unlabeled data in the wild that captures the environmental test-time OOD distributions under both covariate and semantic shifts. To harness such data, our key idea is to selectively provide human feedback and label a small number of informative samples from the wild data distribution, which are then used to train a multi-class classifier and an OOD detector. By exploiting human feedback, we enhance the robustness and reliability of machine learning models, equipping them with the capability to handle OOD scenarios with greater precision. We provide theoretical insights on the generalization error bounds to justify our algorithm. Extensive experiments show the superiority of our method, outperforming the current state-of-the-art by a significant margin.

Read more

8/16/2024

On the Learnability of Out-of-distribution Detection
Total Score

0

On the Learnability of Out-of-distribution Detection

Zhen Fang, Yixuan Li, Feng Liu, Bo Han, Jie Lu

Supervised learning aims to train a classifier under the assumption that training and test data are from the same distribution. To ease the above assumption, researchers have studied a more realistic setting: out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, where test data may come from classes that are unknown during training (i.e., OOD data). Due to the unavailability and diversity of OOD data, good generalization ability is crucial for effective OOD detection algorithms, and corresponding learning theory is still an open problem. To study the generalization of OOD detection, this paper investigates the probably approximately correct (PAC) learning theory of OOD detection that fits the commonly used evaluation metrics in the literature. First, we find a necessary condition for the learnability of OOD detection. Then, using this condition, we prove several impossibility theorems for the learnability of OOD detection under some scenarios. Although the impossibility theorems are frustrating, we find that some conditions of these impossibility theorems may not hold in some practical scenarios. Based on this observation, we next give several necessary and sufficient conditions to characterize the learnability of OOD detection in some practical scenarios. Lastly, we offer theoretical support for representative OOD detection works based on our OOD theory.

Read more

4/9/2024

Continual Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection
Total Score

0

Continual Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection

Lars Doorenbos, Raphael Sznitman, Pablo M'arquez-Neila

Deep learning models excel when the data distribution during training aligns with testing data. Yet, their performance diminishes when faced with out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, leading to great interest in the field of OOD detection. Current approaches typically assume that OOD samples originate from an unconcentrated distribution complementary to the training distribution. While this assumption is appropriate in the traditional unsupervised OOD (U-OOD) setting, it proves inadequate when considering the place of deployment of the underlying deep learning model. To better reflect this real-world scenario, we introduce the novel setting of continual U-OOD detection. To tackle this new setting, we propose a method that starts from a U-OOD detector, which is agnostic to the OOD distribution, and slowly updates during deployment to account for the actual OOD distribution. Our method uses a new U-OOD scoring function that combines the Mahalanobis distance with a nearest-neighbor approach. Furthermore, we design a confidence-scaled few-shot OOD detector that outperforms previous methods. We show our method greatly improves upon strong baselines from related fields.

Read more

6/5/2024

NeuralOOD: Improving Out-of-Distribution Generalization Performance with Brain-machine Fusion Learning Framework
Total Score

0

NeuralOOD: Improving Out-of-Distribution Generalization Performance with Brain-machine Fusion Learning Framework

Shuangchen Zhao, Changde Du, Hui Li, Huiguang He

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have demonstrated exceptional recognition capabilities in traditional computer vision (CV) tasks. However, existing CV models often suffer a significant decrease in accuracy when confronted with out-of-distribution (OOD) data. In contrast to these DNN models, human can maintain a consistently low error rate when facing OOD scenes, partly attributed to the rich prior cognitive knowledge stored in the human brain. Previous OOD generalization researches only focus on the single modal, overlooking the advantages of multimodal learning method. In this paper, we utilize the multimodal learning method to improve the OOD generalization and propose a novel Brain-machine Fusion Learning (BMFL) framework. We adopt the cross-attention mechanism to fuse the visual knowledge from CV model and prior cognitive knowledge from the human brain. Specially, we employ a pre-trained visual neural encoding model to predict the functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) from visual features which eliminates the need for the fMRI data collection and pre-processing, effectively reduces the workload associated with conventional BMFL methods. Furthermore, we construct a brain transformer to facilitate the extraction of knowledge inside the fMRI data. Moreover, we introduce the Pearson correlation coefficient maximization regularization method into the training process, which improves the fusion capability with better constrains. Our model outperforms the DINOv2 and baseline models on the ImageNet-1k validation dataset as well as six curated OOD datasets, showcasing its superior performance in diverse scenarios.

Read more

8/28/2024