Part-based Quantitative Analysis for Heatmaps
0
🚀
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Heatmaps are a common approach in Explainable AI (XAI) to help understand how deep neural networks make decisions.
- While heatmaps have become more informative and accessible, their analysis is often subjective and limited to domain experts.
- There is a need for more objective, end-user friendly, and cost-effective methods to analyze heatmaps, as well as comprehensive evaluation metrics to assess heatmap quality.
Plain English Explanation
Heatmaps are a way to visualize how deep learning models make decisions. They show which parts of an image or input are most important for the model's predictions. This can help explain the reasoning behind the model's outputs, which is important for building trust and transparency in these powerful AI systems.
While heatmaps have become more useful and easier to understand, their analysis is often quite subjective and requires specialized knowledge. This limits their accessibility and usefulness for non-experts. Researchers are working on developing more automatic, scalable, and quantitative methods to analyze heatmaps. This would make heatmap-based XAI more objective, user-friendly, and cost-effective to deploy. They also want to create better ways to measure the quality of heatmaps, so we can consistently evaluate and improve these XAI techniques.
Technical Explanation
The paper discusses the challenges and importance of developing better methods for heatmap analysis and evaluation in the context of Explainable AI (XAI). Heatmaps are a common approach used to understand the decision-making of deep neural networks, but their analysis is typically very subjective and limited to domain experts.
To address this, the researchers highlight the need for automatic, scalable, and numerical analysis techniques that can make heatmap-based XAI more objective, end-user friendly, and cost-effective. They also emphasize the importance of comprehensive evaluation metrics to assess heatmap quality at a granular level, going beyond just overall performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of improving heatmap analysis and evaluation methods. As deep learning models become more widely deployed, especially in high-stakes domains like healthcare, it is critical to develop XAI techniques that are accessible and trustworthy for end-users.
However, the paper does not provide specific details on the types of automatic analysis methods or evaluation metrics the researchers have in mind. Further research and experimentation will be needed to develop and validate such approaches. Additionally, the subjectivity of heatmap interpretation may be difficult to fully eliminate, even with more quantitative analysis tools.
Conclusion
This paper highlights a crucial challenge in the field of Explainable AI: making heatmap-based explanations more objective, scalable, and accessible to non-experts. Addressing this challenge could significantly improve the transparency and trustworthiness of deep learning models, especially in high-impact domains. The proposed directions for future research, including automated analysis methods and comprehensive evaluation metrics, offer a promising path forward for advancing the state of the art in XAI.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🚀
0
Part-based Quantitative Analysis for Heatmaps
Osman Tursun, Sinan Kalkan, Simon Denman, Sridha Sridharan, Clinton Fookes
Heatmaps have been instrumental in helping understand deep network decisions, and are a common approach for Explainable AI (XAI). While significant progress has been made in enhancing the informativeness and accessibility of heatmaps, heatmap analysis is typically very subjective and limited to domain experts. As such, developing automatic, scalable, and numerical analysis methods to make heatmap-based XAI more objective, end-user friendly, and cost-effective is vital. In addition, there is a need for comprehensive evaluation metrics to assess heatmap quality at a granular level.
Read more5/24/2024
🏷️
0
TbExplain: A Text-based Explanation Method for Scene Classification Models with the Statistical Prediction Correction
Amirhossein Aminimehr, Pouya Khani, Amirali Molaei, Amirmohammad Kazemeini, Erik Cambria
The field of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) aims to improve the interpretability of black-box machine learning models. Building a heatmap based on the importance value of input features is a popular method for explaining the underlying functions of such models in producing their predictions. Heatmaps are almost understandable to humans, yet they are not without flaws. Non-expert users, for example, may not fully understand the logic of heatmaps (the logic in which relevant pixels to the model's prediction are highlighted with different intensities or colors). Additionally, objects and regions of the input image that are relevant to the model prediction are frequently not entirely differentiated by heatmaps. In this paper, we propose a framework called TbExplain that employs XAI techniques and a pre-trained object detector to present text-based explanations of scene classification models. Moreover, TbExplain incorporates a novel method to correct predictions and textually explain them based on the statistics of objects in the input image when the initial prediction is unreliable. To assess the trustworthiness and validity of the text-based explanations, we conducted a qualitative experiment, and the findings indicated that these explanations are sufficiently reliable. Furthermore, our quantitative and qualitative experiments on TbExplain with scene classification datasets reveal an improvement in classification accuracy over ResNet variants.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Model Guidance via Explanations Turns Image Classifiers into Segmentation Models
Xiaoyan Yu, Jannik Franzen, Wojciech Samek, Marina M. -C. Hohne, Dagmar Kainmueller
Heatmaps generated on inputs of image classification networks via explainable AI methods like Grad-CAM and LRP have been observed to resemble segmentations of input images in many cases. Consequently, heatmaps have also been leveraged for achieving weakly supervised segmentation with image-level supervision. On the other hand, losses can be imposed on differentiable heatmaps, which has been shown to serve for (1)~improving heatmaps to be more human-interpretable, (2)~regularization of networks towards better generalization, (3)~training diverse ensembles of networks, and (4)~for explicitly ignoring confounding input features. Due to the latter use case, the paradigm of imposing losses on heatmaps is often referred to as Right for the right reasons. We unify these two lines of research by investigating semi-supervised segmentation as a novel use case for the Right for the Right Reasons paradigm. First, we show formal parallels between differentiable heatmap architectures and standard encoder-decoder architectures for image segmentation. Second, we show that such differentiable heatmap architectures yield competitive results when trained with standard segmentation losses. Third, we show that such architectures allow for training with weak supervision in the form of image-level labels and small numbers of pixel-level labels, outperforming comparable encoder-decoder models. Code is available at url{https://github.com/Kainmueller-Lab/TW-autoencoder}.
Read more7/4/2024
0
Are Objective Explanatory Evaluation metrics Trustworthy? An Adversarial Analysis
Prithwijit Chowdhury, Mohit Prabhushankar, Ghassan AlRegib, Mohamed Deriche
Explainable AI (XAI) has revolutionized the field of deep learning by empowering users to have more trust in neural network models. The field of XAI allows users to probe the inner workings of these algorithms to elucidate their decision-making processes. The rise in popularity of XAI has led to the advent of different strategies to produce explanations, all of which only occasionally agree. Thus several objective evaluation metrics have been devised to decide which of these modules give the best explanation for specific scenarios. The goal of the paper is twofold: (i) we employ the notions of necessity and sufficiency from causal literature to come up with a novel explanatory technique called SHifted Adversaries using Pixel Elimination(SHAPE) which satisfies all the theoretical and mathematical criteria of being a valid explanation, (ii) we show that SHAPE is, infact, an adversarial explanation that fools causal metrics that are employed to measure the robustness and reliability of popular importance based visual XAI methods. Our analysis shows that SHAPE outperforms popular explanatory techniques like GradCAM and GradCAM++ in these tests and is comparable to RISE, raising questions about the sanity of these metrics and the need for human involvement for an overall better evaluation.
Read more6/13/2024