Perceptual Similarity for Measuring Decision-Making Style and Policy Diversity in Games
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Presents a method for measuring the decision-making styles and policy diversity of agents in multi-agent games
- Uses perceptual similarity, which compares the visual appearance of agents' actions, to quantify these properties
- Demonstrates the approach on several game environments and discusses potential applications
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a way to analyze the behavior of agents, such as AI systems or human players, in multi-agent games. The key idea is to compare the visual appearance of the actions taken by different agents, rather than just looking at the outcomes of their decisions.
By measuring the perceptual similarity between agents' actions, the researchers can gain insights into the agents' decision-making styles and the diversity of their policies (the strategies they use to make decisions). This can be useful for understanding how different agents approach a game, how they interact with each other, and how their approaches compare.
For example, if two agents' actions look very similar, it suggests they are using similar decision-making styles. Conversely, if their actions look very different, it implies they have diverse approaches. This information can be valuable for designing multi-agent systems, analyzing human behavior in games, and other applications.
The paper demonstrates this perceptual similarity approach in several game environments and discusses how it can be used to gain new insights about the agents involved.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a method for measuring the decision-making style and policy diversity of agents in multi-agent games by comparing the perceptual similarity of their actions. Perceptual similarity is a metric that captures the visual appearance of agents' actions, rather than just their outcomes.
The researchers first define a perceptual similarity function that compares the visual representations of agents' actions. They then use this function to calculate the pairwise similarity between all agents' actions, creating a similarity matrix that represents the decision-making style of each agent and the diversity of policies within the group.
The authors test this approach in several game environments, including [object Object], [object Object], and [object Object]. They demonstrate how the perceptual similarity analysis can reveal insights about the agents' behaviors, such as the presence of distinct decision-making styles or clusters of similar policies.
The paper also discusses potential applications of this approach, such as [object Object] and [object Object], and highlights areas for further research, such as extending the method to handle continuous action spaces and incorporating temporal information.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and interesting approach to analyzing the decision-making behaviors of agents in multi-agent games. The perceptual similarity metric offers a unique way to capture the nuances of agent behavior beyond just the outcomes of their decisions.
One potential limitation is that the method relies on the availability of visual representations of the agents' actions, which may not always be straightforward to obtain or define, especially for more abstract or complex game environments.
Additionally, the paper focuses on static comparisons of agent actions, without considering the temporal aspects of decision-making. Incorporating dynamic information, such as the sequence of actions or the evolution of agent policies over time, could provide further insights into the agents' decision-making processes.
Overall, the perceptual similarity approach presented in this paper is a promising direction for the study of multi-agent systems and the analysis of decision-making styles and policy diversity. The authors have demonstrated the value of this technique, and future research could explore ways to expand and refine the method to address the identified limitations.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel method for measuring the decision-making style and policy diversity of agents in multi-agent games using perceptual similarity. By comparing the visual appearance of agents' actions, rather than just their outcomes, the researchers can gain insights into the nuances of agent behavior and the interactions between different decision-making strategies.
The demonstrated applications of this approach, such as in [object Object], [object Object], and [object Object], suggest that the perceptual similarity analysis can be a valuable tool for understanding and designing multi-agent systems, as well as for analyzing human behavior in game environments.
Future research could explore ways to extend the method to handle continuous action spaces, incorporate temporal information, and address other limitations identified in the critical analysis. Nonetheless, this paper represents an important contribution to the field of multi-agent decision-making and opens up new avenues for the study of agent behavior and policy diversity.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Perceptual Similarity for Measuring Decision-Making Style and Policy Diversity in Games
Chiu-Chou Lin, Wei-Chen Chiu, I-Chen Wu
Defining and measuring decision-making styles, also known as playstyles, is crucial in gaming, where these styles reflect a broad spectrum of individuality and diversity. However, finding a universally applicable measure for these styles poses a challenge. Building on Playstyle Distance, the first unsupervised metric to measure playstyle similarity based on game screens and raw actions, we introduce three enhancements to increase accuracy: multiscale analysis with varied state granularity, a perceptual kernel rooted in psychology, and the utilization of the intersection-over-union method for efficient evaluation. These innovations not only advance measurement precision but also offer insights into human cognition of similarity. Across two racing games and seven Atari games, our techniques significantly improve the precision of zero-shot playstyle classification, achieving an accuracy exceeding 90 percent with fewer than 512 observation-action pairs, which is less than half an episode of these games. Furthermore, our experiments with 2048 and Go demonstrate the potential of discrete playstyle measures in puzzle and board games. We also develop an algorithm for assessing decision-making diversity using these measures. Our findings improve the measurement of end-to-end game analysis and the evolution of artificial intelligence for diverse playstyles.
Read more9/2/2024
🔮
0
Measuring Diversity of Game Scenarios
Yuchen Li, Ziqi Wang, Qingquan Zhang, Jialin Liu
This survey comprehensively reviews the multi-dimensionality of game scenario diversity, spotlighting the innovative use of procedural content generation and other fields as cornerstones for enriching player experiences through diverse game scenarios. By traversing a wide array of disciplines, from affective modeling and multi-agent systems to psychological studies, our research underscores the importance of diverse game scenarios in gameplay and education. Through a taxonomy of diversity metrics and evaluation methods, we aim to bridge the current gaps in literature and practice, offering insights into effective strategies for measuring and integrating diversity in game scenarios. Our analysis highlights the necessity for a unified taxonomy to aid developers and researchers in crafting more engaging and varied game worlds. This survey not only charts a path for future research in diverse game scenarios but also serves as a handbook for industry practitioners seeking to leverage diversity as a key component of game design and development.
Read more4/24/2024
0
People use fast, goal-directed simulation to reason about novel games
Cedegao E. Zhang, Katherine M. Collins, Lionel Wong, Adrian Weller, Joshua B. Tenenbaum
We can evaluate features of problems and their potential solutions well before we can effectively solve them. When considering a game we have never played, for instance, we might infer whether it is likely to be challenging, fair, or fun simply from hearing the game rules, prior to deciding whether to invest time in learning the game or trying to play it well. Many studies of game play have focused on optimality and expertise, characterizing how people and computational models play based on moderate to extensive search and after playing a game dozens (if not thousands or millions) of times. Here, we study how people reason about a range of simple but novel connect-n style board games. We ask people to judge how fair and how fun the games are from very little experience: just thinking about the game for a minute or so, before they have ever actually played with anyone else, and we propose a resource-limited model that captures their judgments using only a small number of partial game simulations and almost no lookahead search.
Read more7/22/2024
0
Toward Human-AI Alignment in Large-Scale Multi-Player Games
Sugandha Sharma, Guy Davidson, Khimya Khetarpal, Anssi Kanervisto, Udit Arora, Katja Hofmann, Ida Momennejad
Achieving human-AI alignment in complex multi-agent games is crucial for creating trustworthy AI agents that enhance gameplay. We propose a method to evaluate this alignment using an interpretable task-sets framework, focusing on high-level behavioral tasks instead of low-level policies. Our approach has three components. First, we analyze extensive human gameplay data from Xbox's Bleeding Edge (100K+ games), uncovering behavioral patterns in a complex task space. This task space serves as a basis set for a behavior manifold capturing interpretable axes: fight-flight, explore-exploit, and solo-multi-agent. Second, we train an AI agent to play Bleeding Edge using a Generative Pretrained Causal Transformer and measure its behavior. Third, we project human and AI gameplay to the proposed behavior manifold to compare and contrast. This allows us to interpret differences in policy as higher-level behavioral concepts, e.g., we find that while human players exhibit variability in fight-flight and explore-exploit behavior, AI players tend towards uniformity. Furthermore, AI agents predominantly engage in solo play, while humans often engage in cooperative and competitive multi-agent patterns. These stark differences underscore the need for interpretable evaluation, design, and integration of AI in human-aligned applications. Our study advances the alignment discussion in AI and especially generative AI research, offering a measurable framework for interpretable human-agent alignment in multiplayer gaming.
Read more6/21/2024