PipeNet: Question Answering with Semantic Pruning over Knowledge Graphs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces PipeNet, a new approach for question answering (QA) over knowledge graphs (KGs).
- PipeNet uses a pipeline of neural network models to efficiently navigate and reason over KGs to answer complex questions.
- The key innovation is a "semantic pruning" step that selectively prunes irrelevant paths in the KG, allowing the model to focus on the most relevant information.
Plain English Explanation
PipeNet is a system that helps answer questions by tapping into a vast pool of structured knowledge stored in knowledge graphs. Knowledge graphs are like giant databases that contain information about real-world entities and how they are related. For example, a knowledge graph might contain information about people, places, and events, and how these things are connected.
When you ask PipeNet a question, it first takes that question and tries to map it onto the relevant parts of the knowledge graph. It does this using natural language processing techniques to understand the meaning and intent behind the question. Then, rather than blindly searching the entire knowledge graph, PipeNet uses a "semantic pruning" step to selectively focus on the most relevant parts of the graph. This makes the process more efficient and helps the system arrive at the right answer more quickly.
The key innovation in PipeNet is this idea of semantic pruning - it allows the system to home in on the most important information and avoid getting bogged down in irrelevant details. This is especially helpful when answering complex, multi-part questions that require piecing together information from different parts of the knowledge graph. By being more selective, PipeNet can tackle these kinds of questions more effectively than previous approaches.
Technical Explanation
PipeNet is a multi-stage question answering system over knowledge graphs that uses a specialized reasoning module to selectively prune the knowledge graph and focus on the most relevant information.
The first stage of PipeNet maps the input question to relevant entities and relations in the knowledge graph using a language model. The second stage uses a graph neural network to extract relevant subgraphs and reason over them. Crucially, PipeNet includes an intermediate "semantic pruning" step that selectively removes less relevant paths in the knowledge graph, allowing the reasoning module to focus on the most salient information.
The semantic pruning is guided by a pre-trained model that assess the relevance of different subgraphs to the question. This graph-based structure-aware prompt allows PipeNet to home in on the most promising areas of the knowledge graph, making the overall reasoning process more efficient.
Critical Analysis
The authors thoroughly evaluate PipeNet on several standard knowledge graph QA benchmarks and demonstrate significant performance improvements over prior work. However, the paper does not deeply explore the limitations or failure cases of the semantic pruning approach. It would be valuable to understand how PipeNet behaves on more challenging or ambiguous questions where the relevance of different subgraphs is less clear.
Additionally, the paper does not provide much insight into the interpretability or explainability of PipeNet's reasoning process. Understanding why the system selects certain paths over others could make the technology more transparent and trustworthy, especially for high-stakes applications.
Overall, PipeNet represents an interesting and promising advance in knowledge graph QA. The semantic pruning innovation is a clever way to make the reasoning process more efficient. But further research is needed to fully understand the strengths, weaknesses, and failure modes of this approach.
Conclusion
The PipeNet paper introduces an innovative question answering system that leverages knowledge graphs to answer complex queries. By selectively pruning irrelevant information from the knowledge graph using a semantic relevance model, PipeNet is able to reason more efficiently and provide more accurate answers.
This work pushes the state-of-the-art in knowledge graph-based question answering and demonstrates the value of carefully managing the information available to a reasoning system. The semantic pruning approach in particular could have broad applicability beyond just knowledge graph QA, opening up new possibilities for building more scalable and effective AI systems that can make sense of large, complex datasets.
While further research is needed to fully understand the limitations of this approach, PipeNet represents an important step forward in the quest to build AI systems that can truly understand and reason about the world in human-like ways.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
PipeNet: Question Answering with Semantic Pruning over Knowledge Graphs
Ying Su, Jipeng Zhang, Yangqiu Song, Tong Zhang
It is well acknowledged that incorporating explicit knowledge graphs (KGs) can benefit question answering. Existing approaches typically follow a grounding-reasoning pipeline in which entity nodes are first grounded for the query (question and candidate answers), and then a reasoning module reasons over the matched multi-hop subgraph for answer prediction. Although the pipeline largely alleviates the issue of extracting essential information from giant KGs, efficiency is still an open challenge when scaling up hops in grounding the subgraphs. In this paper, we target at finding semantically related entity nodes in the subgraph to improve the efficiency of graph reasoning with KG. We propose a grounding-pruning-reasoning pipeline to prune noisy nodes, remarkably reducing the computation cost and memory usage while also obtaining decent subgraph representation. In detail, the pruning module first scores concept nodes based on the dependency distance between matched spans and then prunes the nodes according to score ranks. To facilitate the evaluation of pruned subgraphs, we also propose a graph attention network (GAT) based module to reason with the subgraph data. Experimental results on CommonsenseQA and OpenBookQA demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
Read more5/20/2024
0
Query-Enhanced Adaptive Semantic Path Reasoning for Inductive Knowledge Graph Completion
Kai Sun, Jiapu Wang, Huajie Jiang, Yongli Hu, Baocai Yin
Conventional Knowledge graph completion (KGC) methods aim to infer missing information in incomplete Knowledge Graphs (KGs) by leveraging existing information, which struggle to perform effectively in scenarios involving emerging entities. Inductive KGC methods can handle the emerging entities and relations in KGs, offering greater dynamic adaptability. While existing inductive KGC methods have achieved some success, they also face challenges, such as susceptibility to noisy structural information during reasoning and difficulty in capturing long-range dependencies in reasoning paths. To address these challenges, this paper proposes the Query-Enhanced Adaptive Semantic Path Reasoning (QASPR) framework, which simultaneously captures both the structural and semantic information of KGs to enhance the inductive KGC task. Specifically, the proposed QASPR employs a query-dependent masking module to adaptively mask noisy structural information while retaining important information closely related to the targets. Additionally, QASPR introduces a global semantic scoring module that evaluates both the individual contributions and the collective impact of nodes along the reasoning path within KGs. The experimental results demonstrate that QASPR achieves state-of-the-art performance.
Read more6/5/2024
0
Knowledge Graph Pruning for Recommendation
Fake Lin, Xi Zhu, Ziwei Zhao, Deqiang Huang, Yu Yu, Xueying Li, Zhi Zheng, Tong Xu, Enhong Chen
Recent years have witnessed the prosperity of knowledge graph based recommendation system (KGRS), which enriches the representation of users, items, and entities by structural knowledge with striking improvement. Nevertheless, its unaffordable computational cost still limits researchers from exploring more sophisticated models. We observe that the bottleneck for training efficiency arises from the knowledge graph, which is plagued by the well-known issue of knowledge explosion. Recently, some works have attempted to slim the inflated KG via summarization techniques. However, these summarized nodes may ignore the collaborative signals and deviate from the facts that nodes in knowledge graph represent symbolic abstractions of entities from the real-world. To this end, in this paper, we propose a novel approach called KGTrimmer for knowledge graph pruning tailored for recommendation, to remove the unessential nodes while minimizing performance degradation. Specifically, we design an importance evaluator from a dual-view perspective. For the collective view, we embrace the idea of collective intelligence by extracting community consensus based on abundant collaborative signals, i.e. nodes are considered important if they attract attention of numerous users. For the holistic view, we learn a global mask to identify the valueless nodes from their inherent properties or overall popularity. Next, we build an end-to-end importance-aware graph neural network, which injects filtered knowledge to enhance the distillation of valuable user-item collaborative signals. Ultimately, we generate a pruned knowledge graph with lightweight, stable, and robust properties to facilitate the following-up recommendation task. Extensive experiments are conducted on three publicly available datasets to prove the effectiveness and generalization ability of KGTrimmer.
Read more7/10/2024
💬
0
Multi-hop Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs using Large Language Models
Abir Chakraborty
Knowledge graphs (KGs) are large datasets with specific structures representing large knowledge bases (KB) where each node represents a key entity and relations amongst them are typed edges. Natural language queries formed to extract information from a KB entail starting from specific nodes and reasoning over multiple edges of the corresponding KG to arrive at the correct set of answer nodes. Traditional approaches of question answering on KG are based on (a) semantic parsing (SP), where a logical form (e.g., S-expression, SPARQL query, etc.) is generated using node and edge embeddings and then reasoning over these representations or tuning language models to generate the final answer directly, or (b) information-retrieval based that works by extracting entities and relations sequentially. In this work, we evaluate the capability of (LLMs) to answer questions over KG that involve multiple hops. We show that depending upon the size and nature of the KG we need different approaches to extract and feed the relevant information to an LLM since every LLM comes with a fixed context window. We evaluate our approach on six KGs with and without the availability of example-specific sub-graphs and show that both the IR and SP-based methods can be adopted by LLMs resulting in an extremely competitive performance.
Read more5/1/2024