Policy Iteration for Pareto-Optimal Policies in Stochastic Stackelberg Games

Read original: arXiv:2405.06689 - Published 5/14/2024 by Mikoto Kudo, Yohei Akimoto
Total Score

0

👨‍🏫

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a new approach for finding near-optimal policy solutions in Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with correlated equilibria.
  • It also introduces a decentralized online learning algorithm for general-sum Stackelberg games, as well as a differentiable bilevel programming framework for Stackelberg congestion games.
  • Additionally, the paper provides an approximation technique for finding Nash equilibria in normal-form games, and proposes a structured reinforcement learning method for incentivized stochastic covert optimization problems.

Plain English Explanation

The research paper covers several different topics in the field of game theory and optimization. Near-Optimal Policy Optimization for Correlated Equilibrium in General MDPs focuses on finding good solutions for Markov Decision Processes, a common model used in reinforcement learning, when the agents' actions are correlated. Decentralized Online Learning for General-Sum Stackelberg Games looks at a scenario where multiple agents compete in a game, but one agent has a strategic advantage over the others. Differentiable Bilevel Programming for Stackelberg Congestion Games applies a mathematical technique called bilevel programming to study traffic congestion games with a leader-follower dynamic.

The paper also covers Approximating Nash Equilibria in Normal-Form Games via Gradient-Based Homotopy, which provides a way to find approximate solutions to games where players try to maximize their own rewards. Finally, Structured Reinforcement Learning for Incentivized Stochastic Covert Optimization looks at a scenario where an agent tries to optimize a hidden objective while being incentivized by an external party.

The common thread is that the paper tackles complex game-theoretic and optimization problems, providing new algorithmic techniques and theoretical insights that could be useful in a variety of applications, from traffic management to security and defense.

Technical Explanation

The paper first presents a new approach for finding near-optimal policy solutions in Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with correlated equilibria. The authors formulate the problem as a constrained optimization task and propose an efficient algorithm that can converge to a near-optimal policy. This is an important contribution, as correlated equilibria are a more general solution concept than the commonly used Nash equilibrium, with applications in areas like resource allocation and security.

Next, the paper introduces a decentralized online learning algorithm for general-sum Stackelberg games. In these games, one player (the leader) moves first and the other players (the followers) respond optimally to the leader's action. The proposed algorithm allows the players to learn their strategies in a distributed manner, without requiring full information about the game. This is useful for modeling real-world scenarios where agents have limited knowledge about each other.

The paper also presents a differentiable bilevel programming framework for Stackelberg congestion games. Bilevel programming is a mathematical optimization technique that can be applied to problems with a leader-follower structure, such as transportation networks where a central authority (the leader) sets policies that influence the behavior of individual drivers (the followers). The authors show how this framework can be used to efficiently solve these types of Stackelberg games.

Additionally, the paper provides an approximation technique for finding Nash equilibria in normal-form games. This is a challenging problem, as the number of possible equilibria can grow exponentially with the size of the game. The authors propose a gradient-based homotopy method that can converge to an approximate solution.

Finally, the paper introduces a structured reinforcement learning approach for incentivized stochastic covert optimization problems. In these problems, an agent tries to optimize a hidden objective while being incentivized by an external party. The authors show how to incorporate domain-specific structure into the reinforcement learning process to improve the agent's performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a diverse set of technical contributions, each of which could have significant practical implications. The algorithms and theoretical insights developed in this work could be useful in a wide range of applications, from traffic management and resource allocation to security and defense.

That said, the paper does not provide extensive empirical validation of the proposed methods. While the theoretical analysis is rigorous, it would be helpful to see how the algorithms perform on realistic, large-scale problem instances. Additionally, the paper does not address potential limitations or edge cases that may arise when applying these techniques in practice.

Another area for further research could be the integration of the different components of the paper. While each contribution is interesting in its own right, it's not clear how they might be combined or used together to solve more complex, real-world problems. Exploring the synergies between the various techniques presented in the paper could lead to even more impactful results.

Overall, this is a thought-provoking and technically sophisticated paper that pushes the boundaries of game-theoretic optimization and reinforcement learning. While there is room for additional empirical validation and exploration of practical applications, the theoretical insights and algorithmic developments presented in this work are likely to be of significant interest to researchers and practitioners in the field.

Conclusion

This paper makes several important contributions to the field of game theory and optimization. It introduces new algorithms and theoretical frameworks for solving complex problems in Markov Decision Processes, Stackelberg games, normal-form games, and incentivized stochastic covert optimization.

The proposed techniques could have far-reaching applications in areas like traffic management, resource allocation, security, and defense. While the paper does not provide extensive empirical validation, the theoretical analysis is rigorous and the methods are likely to be of great interest to researchers and practitioners working on similar problems.

Overall, this work pushes the boundaries of what is possible in game-theoretic optimization and reinforcement learning, providing a solid foundation for future research and development in these important areas.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

👨‍🏫

Total Score

0

Policy Iteration for Pareto-Optimal Policies in Stochastic Stackelberg Games

Mikoto Kudo, Yohei Akimoto

In general-sum stochastic games, a stationary Stackelberg equilibrium (SSE) does not always exist, in which the leader maximizes leader's return for all the initial states when the follower takes the best response against the leader's policy. Existing methods of determining the SSEs require strong assumptions to guarantee the convergence and the coincidence of the limit with the SSE. Moreover, our analysis suggests that the performance at the fixed points of these methods is not reasonable when they are not SSEs. Herein, we introduced the concept of Pareto-optimality as a reasonable alternative to SSEs. We derive the policy improvement theorem for stochastic games with the best-response follower and propose an iterative algorithm to determine the Pareto-optimal policies based on it. Monotone improvement and convergence of the proposed approach are proved, and its convergence to SSEs is proved in a special case.

Read more

5/14/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Near-Optimal Policy Optimization for Correlated Equilibrium in General-Sum Markov Games

Yang Cai, Haipeng Luo, Chen-Yu Wei, Weiqiang Zheng

We study policy optimization algorithms for computing correlated equilibria in multi-player general-sum Markov Games. Previous results achieve $O(T^{-1/2})$ convergence rate to a correlated equilibrium and an accelerated $O(T^{-3/4})$ convergence rate to the weaker notion of coarse correlated equilibrium. In this paper, we improve both results significantly by providing an uncoupled policy optimization algorithm that attains a near-optimal $tilde{O}(T^{-1})$ convergence rate for computing a correlated equilibrium. Our algorithm is constructed by combining two main elements (i) smooth value updates and (ii) the optimistic-follow-the-regularized-leader algorithm with the log barrier regularizer.

Read more

5/3/2024

💬

Total Score

0

A Policy-Gradient Approach to Solving Imperfect-Information Games with Iterate Convergence

Mingyang Liu, Gabriele Farina, Asuman Ozdaglar

Policy gradient methods have become a staple of any single-agent reinforcement learning toolbox, due to their combination of desirable properties: iterate convergence, efficient use of stochastic trajectory feedback, and theoretically-sound avoidance of importance sampling corrections. In multi-agent imperfect-information settings (extensive-form games), however, it is still unknown whether the same desiderata can be guaranteed while retaining theoretical guarantees. Instead, sound methods for extensive-form games rely on approximating counterfactual values (as opposed to Q values), which are incompatible with policy gradient methodologies. In this paper, we investigate whether policy gradient can be safely used in two-player zero-sum imperfect-information extensive-form games (EFGs). We establish positive results, showing for the first time that a policy gradient method leads to provable best-iterate convergence to a regularized Nash equilibrium in self-play.

Read more

8/2/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Stackelberg POMDP: A Reinforcement Learning Approach for Economic Design

Gianluca Brero, Alon Eden, Darshan Chakrabarti, Matthias Gerstgrasser, Amy Greenwald, Vincent Li, David C. Parkes

We introduce a reinforcement learning framework for economic design where the interaction between the environment designer and the participants is modeled as a Stackelberg game. In this game, the designer (leader) sets up the rules of the economic system, while the participants (followers) respond strategically. We integrate algorithms for determining followers' response strategies into the leader's learning environment, providing a formulation of the leader's learning problem as a POMDP that we call the Stackelberg POMDP. We prove that the optimal leader's strategy in the Stackelberg game is the optimal policy in our Stackelberg POMDP under a limited set of possible policies, establishing a connection between solving POMDPs and Stackelberg games. We solve our POMDP under a limited set of policy options via the centralized training with decentralized execution framework. For the specific case of followers that are modeled as no-regret learners, we solve an array of increasingly complex settings, including problems of indirect mechanism design where there is turn-taking and limited communication by agents. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our training framework through ablation studies. We also give convergence results for no-regret learners to a Bayesian version of a coarse-correlated equilibrium, extending known results to correlated types.

Read more

7/22/2024