Posterior Sampling-Based Bayesian Optimization with Tighter Bayesian Regret Bounds

Overview

• Bayesian optimization (BO) is a powerful technique for optimizing expensive black-box functions
• Gaussian process upper confidence bound (GP-UCB) and Thompson sampling (TS) are well-known acquisition functions (AFs) used in BO
• Recent research has shown that a randomized variant of GP-UCB achieves a tighter Bayesian cumulative regret (BCR) bound compared to standard GP-UCB
• This paper explores whether TS and another AF called probability of improvement from the maximum of a sample path (PIMS) can also achieve this tighter BCR bound
• The paper also analyzes the practical advantages of PIMS over GP-UCB and TS

Plain English Explanation

Bayesian optimization is a technique used to efficiently find the best settings for complicated systems or processes. It works by building a statistical model of the system and then carefully exploring different settings to find the optimal one. Two popular methods used in Bayesian optimization are Gaussian process upper confidence bound (GP-UCB) and Thompson sampling (TS).

Recent research has shown that a modified version of GP-UCB can achieve better performance in terms of a metric called Bayesian cumulative regret (BCR), which measures how much the system's performance suffers while finding the optimal settings. This paper investigates whether TS can also achieve this improved BCR bound, and also looks at a new acquisition function called probability of improvement from the maximum of a sample path (PIMS).

The key advantage of PIMS is that it can avoid some of the practical issues with GP-UCB and TS, such as the need to carefully tune hyperparameters (GP-UCB) or the tendency to over-explore (TS). The paper demonstrates through experiments that PIMS can match the theoretical BCR guarantees of the modified GP-UCB, while also offering better practical performance in many cases.

Technical Explanation

This paper focuses on Bayesian optimization (BO), a powerful technique for optimizing expensive black-box functions. Within BO, the authors consider two well-known acquisition functions (AFs): Gaussian process upper confidence bound (GP-UCB) and Thompson sampling (TS).

The authors note that a randomized variant of GP-UCB has been shown to achieve a tighter Bayesian cumulative regret (BCR) bound compared to standard GP-UCB. Inspired by this, the paper first proves that TS also achieves this tighter BCR bound.

However, the authors point out that both GP-UCB and TS often suffer from practical issues, such as the need for manual hyperparameter tuning (GP-UCB) and a tendency towards over-exploration (TS). To address these problems, the authors analyze a new AF called probability of improvement from the maximum of a sample path (PIMS).

The key contributions of the paper are:

1. Showing that TS achieves the tighter BCR bound, like the randomized variant of GP-UCB.
2. Demonstrating that PIMS also achieves the tighter BCR bound, while avoiding the hyperparameter tuning issues of GP-UCB.
3. Providing a wide range of experiments that highlight the effectiveness of PIMS in mitigating the practical problems of GP-UCB and TS.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough theoretical and empirical analysis of various acquisition functions in Bayesian optimization. The authors make a strong case for the practical advantages of the PIMS acquisition function, which appears to match the theoretical guarantees of the modified GP-UCB while offering improved performance in many real-world scenarios.

One potential limitation of the research is that the theoretical analysis focuses solely on the Bayesian cumulative regret (BCR) metric, which may not capture all aspects of practical performance. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that future work could explore other performance metrics.

Additionally, the paper does not provide much insight into the underlying reasons why PIMS outperforms GP-UCB and TS in practice. A deeper exploration of the mechanisms driving PIMS's advantages could further strengthen the conclusions and provide more guidance for practitioners.

Overall, this paper presents a valuable contribution to the Bayesian optimization literature by introducing a new acquisition function with appealing theoretical and practical properties. The findings encourage readers to think critically about the trade-offs between different BO approaches and to consider PIMS as a compelling alternative to more established methods.

Conclusion

This paper makes significant advancements in the field of Bayesian optimization by analyzing the theoretical and practical properties of various acquisition functions. The key takeaways are:

1. Thompson sampling (TS) can achieve the same tighter Bayesian cumulative regret (BCR) bound as a randomized variant of Gaussian process upper confidence bound (GP-UCB).
2. The authors introduce a new acquisition function called probability of improvement from the maximum of a sample path (PIMS), which also achieves the tighter BCR bound while avoiding the practical issues of GP-UCB and TS.
3. The experimental results demonstrate that PIMS can outperform GP-UCB and TS in a wide range of real-world scenarios, making it a promising alternative for Bayesian optimization practitioners.

These findings have the potential to significantly impact the application of Bayesian optimization techniques, as PIMS offers a robust and effective approach that addresses many of the challenges associated with more established methods. The paper encourages researchers and practitioners to carefully consider the trade-offs between different acquisition functions and to explore the use of PIMS in their own optimization tasks.