The power of Prompts: Evaluating and Mitigating Gender Bias in MT with LLMs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines gender bias in machine translation (MT) systems using large language models (LLMs).
- The researchers evaluate the performance of different prompting strategies to mitigate gender bias in MT.
- They find that carefully designed prompts can significantly reduce gender bias in MT outputs.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates the issue of gender bias in machine translation (MT) systems that use large language models (LLMs). LLMs are powerful AI models that can generate human-like text, but they can also exhibit biases that reflect the data they were trained on.
The researchers wanted to see if they could reduce gender bias in MT by using different "prompting" strategies. Prompting refers to the input text that is used to guide the LLM to generate a desired output. The researchers tested various prompts to see how they affected the gender bias in the MT system's translations.
They found that carefully crafting the prompts could significantly reduce the gender bias in the MT outputs. This suggests that the way we interact with and prompt these powerful AI models can have a big impact on the fairness and accuracy of the results.
Overall, this research highlights the importance of being mindful of potential biases in AI systems and the ability to mitigate them through thoughtful design of prompts and other techniques. As LLMs become more widely used, understanding and addressing these issues will be crucial.
Technical Explanation
The paper evaluates different prompting strategies for reducing gender bias in machine translation (MT) systems that use large language models (LLMs). The researchers first measure the gender bias in the output of several MT models by comparing their translations of sentences with gender-neutral and gender-specific pronouns.
They then experiment with various prompting techniques to see how they impact the gender bias in the MT outputs. The prompts include instructions to the MT system to be "gender-neutral" or "fair," as well as prompts that explicitly mention gender or use gender-specific language.
The results show that carefully designed prompts can significantly reduce gender bias in the MT outputs. Prompts that explicitly instruct the system to be gender-neutral or fair tend to be the most effective at mitigating bias. In contrast, prompts that mention gender or use gender-specific language can actually exacerbate the bias in some cases.
The authors also find that the degree of bias reduction depends on the specific MT model being used. Some models are more susceptible to prompt-based bias mitigation than others.
Overall, this work demonstrates the power of prompting as a technique for addressing biases in LLM-based systems like MT. By thoughtfully designing the input prompts, it is possible to substantially improve the fairness and accuracy of the model's outputs.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the role of prompting in mitigating gender bias in machine translation systems. The experimental design is rigorous, and the results convincingly show the potential of prompt-based techniques to address this important issue.
However, the paper also acknowledges some limitations. The experiments were conducted on a relatively small set of MT models and language pairs, so the generalizability of the findings may be limited. Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential unintended consequences of overly prescriptive prompting, which could lead to other forms of bias or reduce the model's flexibility.
Further research is needed to better understand the long-term implications of prompt-based bias mitigation and how it could be seamlessly integrated into production MT systems. Exploring the interactions between prompting and other debiasing techniques, such as data preprocessing or model fine-tuning, would also be a valuable avenue for future work.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the growing field of responsible AI development. By demonstrating the power of prompting to address gender bias, it highlights the need for a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach to ensuring the fairness and reliability of AI-powered language technologies.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to mitigating gender bias in machine translation systems using large language models. The key finding is that carefully designed prompts can significantly reduce the gender bias exhibited in the MT outputs, suggesting that the way we interact with and prompt these powerful AI models can have a substantial impact on the fairness and accuracy of the results.
The work underscores the importance of being mindful of potential biases in AI systems and the ability to address them through thoughtful design. As large language models become more ubiquitous, understanding and addressing issues of bias and fairness will be crucial for ensuring these technologies are developed and deployed responsibly.
Overall, this research contributes to the growing body of work on responsible AI development and highlights the power of prompting as a technique for improving the fairness and reliability of language technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
The power of Prompts: Evaluating and Mitigating Gender Bias in MT with LLMs
Aleix Sant, Carlos Escolano, Audrey Mash, Francesca De Luca Fornaciari, Maite Melero
This paper studies gender bias in machine translation through the lens of Large Language Models (LLMs). Four widely-used test sets are employed to benchmark various base LLMs, comparing their translation quality and gender bias against state-of-the-art Neural Machine Translation (NMT) models for English to Catalan (En $rightarrow$ Ca) and English to Spanish (En $rightarrow$ Es) translation directions. Our findings reveal pervasive gender bias across all models, with base LLMs exhibiting a higher degree of bias compared to NMT models. To combat this bias, we explore prompting engineering techniques applied to an instruction-tuned LLM. We identify a prompt structure that significantly reduces gender bias by up to 12% on the WinoMT evaluation dataset compared to more straightforward prompts. These results significantly reduce the gender bias accuracy gap between LLMs and traditional NMT systems.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Leveraging Large Language Models to Measure Gender Bias in Gendered Languages
Erik Derner, Sara Sansalvador de la Fuente, Yoan Guti'errez, Paloma Moreda, Nuria Oliver
Gender bias in text corpora used in various natural language processing (NLP) contexts, such as for training large language models (LLMs), can lead to the perpetuation and amplification of societal inequalities. This is particularly pronounced in gendered languages like Spanish or French, where grammatical structures inherently encode gender, making the bias analysis more challenging. Existing methods designed for English are inadequate for this task due to the intrinsic linguistic differences between English and gendered languages. This paper introduces a novel methodology that leverages the contextual understanding capabilities of LLMs to quantitatively analyze gender representation in Spanish corpora. By utilizing LLMs to identify and classify gendered nouns and pronouns in relation to their reference to human entities, our approach provides a nuanced analysis of gender biases. We empirically validate our method on four widely-used benchmark datasets, uncovering significant gender disparities with a male-to-female ratio ranging from 4:1 to 6:1. These findings demonstrate the value of our methodology for bias quantification in gendered languages and suggest its application in NLP, contributing to the development of more equitable language technologies.
Read more6/21/2024
💬
0
Social Bias Evaluation for Large Language Models Requires Prompt Variations
Rem Hida, Masahiro Kaneko, Naoaki Okazaki
Warning: This paper contains examples of stereotypes and biases. Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit considerable social biases, and various studies have tried to evaluate and mitigate these biases accurately. Previous studies use downstream tasks as prompts to examine the degree of social biases for evaluation and mitigation. While LLMs' output highly depends on prompts, previous studies evaluating and mitigating bias have often relied on a limited variety of prompts. In this paper, we investigate the sensitivity of LLMs when changing prompt variations (task instruction and prompt, few-shot examples, debias-prompt) by analyzing task performance and social bias of LLMs. Our experimental results reveal that LLMs are highly sensitive to prompts to the extent that the ranking of LLMs fluctuates when comparing models for task performance and social bias. Additionally, we show that LLMs have tradeoffs between performance and social bias caused by the prompts. Less bias from prompt setting may result in reduced performance. Moreover, the ambiguity of instances is one of the reasons for this sensitivity to prompts in advanced LLMs, leading to various outputs. We recommend using diverse prompts, as in this study, to compare the effects of prompts on social bias in LLMs.
Read more7/4/2024
0
Evaluation of Large Language Models: STEM education and Gender Stereotypes
Smilla Due, Sneha Das, Marianne Andersen, Berta Plandolit L'opez, Sniff Andersen Nex{o}, Line Clemmensen
Large Language Models (LLMs) have an increasing impact on our lives with use cases such as chatbots, study support, coding support, ideation, writing assistance, and more. Previous studies have revealed linguistic biases in pronouns used to describe professions or adjectives used to describe men vs women. These issues have to some degree been addressed in updated LLM versions, at least to pass existing tests. However, biases may still be present in the models, and repeated use of gender stereotypical language may reinforce the underlying assumptions and are therefore important to examine further. This paper investigates gender biases in LLMs in relation to educational choices through an open-ended, true to user-case experimental design and a quantitative analysis. We investigate the biases in the context of four different cultures, languages, and educational systems (English/US/UK, Danish/DK, Catalan/ES, and Hindi/IN) for ages ranging from 10 to 16 years, corresponding to important educational transition points in the different countries. We find that there are significant and large differences in the ratio of STEM to non-STEM suggested education paths provided by chatGPT when using typical girl vs boy names to prompt lists of suggested things to become. There are generally fewer STEM suggestions in the Danish, Spanish, and Indian context compared to the English. We also find subtle differences in the suggested professions, which we categorise and report.
Read more6/17/2024