Practical multi-fidelity machine learning: fusion of deterministic and Bayesian models

Read original: arXiv:2407.15110 - Published 7/23/2024 by Jiaxiang Yi, Ji Cheng, Miguel A. Bessa
Total Score

0

Practical multi-fidelity machine learning: fusion of deterministic and Bayesian models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a practical approach for combining deterministic and Bayesian machine learning models to create a more accurate and robust multi-fidelity model.
  • The key idea is to leverage the strengths of both types of models - the efficiency and speed of deterministic models, and the uncertainty quantification capabilities of Bayesian models.
  • The proposed method demonstrates improved performance over using either deterministic or Bayesian models alone, across a range of benchmark problems.

Plain English Explanation

In machine learning, there are often multiple ways to model a problem, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. Deterministic models are efficient and fast, but don't provide information about the uncertainty in their predictions. Bayesian models, on the other hand, can quantify uncertainty but are often slower and more computationally expensive.

This paper introduces a way to combine the strengths of both deterministic and Bayesian models into a single, more powerful "multi-fidelity" model. The key idea is to use the deterministic model to make quick, initial predictions, and then use a Bayesian model to refine those predictions and provide uncertainty estimates.

By fusing these two types of models together, the researchers were able to create a system that is both fast and accurate, with the ability to quantify the uncertainty in its outputs. This multi-fidelity approach outperformed using either deterministic or Bayesian models alone on a variety of benchmark problems.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a multi-fidelity modeling framework that combines deterministic and Bayesian models. The deterministic model is used to provide an initial, fast prediction, while the Bayesian model is used to refine the prediction and quantify the uncertainty.

Specifically, the authors use a multi-fidelity Gaussian process (GP) model to capture the relationship between the deterministic and Bayesian model outputs. This GP model is trained on data from both models, allowing it to learn how to best combine their predictions.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a range of benchmark problems, including physics-based simulations and machine learning tasks. In all cases, the multi-fidelity model outperformed using either the deterministic or Bayesian model alone, both in terms of predictive accuracy and uncertainty quantification.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the proposed multi-fidelity modeling approach. The authors acknowledge some limitations, such as the need for careful hyperparameter tuning and the potential for the Bayesian model to be computationally expensive for large-scale problems.

One area that could be explored further is the robustness of the approach to different types of deterministic and Bayesian models. The paper focuses on a specific combination of a deterministic neural network and a Bayesian neural network, but it would be interesting to see how the method performs with other model architectures or uncertainty quantification techniques.

Additionally, the authors could provide more insights into the practical considerations of implementing this approach, such as the trade-offs between the speed and accuracy of the deterministic and Bayesian models, and how to best balance these factors in real-world applications.

Conclusion

This paper presents an effective way to combine the strengths of deterministic and Bayesian machine learning models into a single, more powerful multi-fidelity approach. By leveraging the efficiency of deterministic models and the uncertainty quantification capabilities of Bayesian models, the researchers were able to create a system that outperforms using either model type alone.

This work has important implications for a wide range of applications, from physics-based simulations to complex machine learning tasks, where both speed and accurate uncertainty estimation are crucial. The proposed multi-fidelity framework provides a practical and effective solution to this challenge, and could lead to significant advancements in the field of applied machine learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Practical multi-fidelity machine learning: fusion of deterministic and Bayesian models
Total Score

0

Practical multi-fidelity machine learning: fusion of deterministic and Bayesian models

Jiaxiang Yi, Ji Cheng, Miguel A. Bessa

Multi-fidelity machine learning methods address the accuracy-efficiency trade-off by integrating scarce, resource-intensive high-fidelity data with abundant but less accurate low-fidelity data. We propose a practical multi-fidelity strategy for problems spanning low- and high-dimensional domains, integrating a non-probabilistic regression model for the low-fidelity with a Bayesian model for the high-fidelity. The models are trained in a staggered scheme, where the low-fidelity model is transfer-learned to the high-fidelity data and a Bayesian model is trained for the residual. This three-model strategy -- deterministic low-fidelity, transfer learning, and Bayesian residual -- leads to a prediction that includes uncertainty quantification both for noisy and noiseless multi-fidelity data. The strategy is general and unifies the topic, highlighting the expressivity trade-off between the transfer-learning and Bayesian models (a complex transfer-learning model leads to a simpler Bayesian model, and vice versa). We propose modeling choices for two scenarios, and argue in favor of using a linear transfer-learning model that fuses 1) kernel ridge regression for low-fidelity with Gaussian processes for high-fidelity; or 2) deep neural network for low-fidelity with a Bayesian neural network for high-fidelity. We demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed strategies and contrast them with the state-of-the-art based on various numerical examples. The simplicity of these formulations makes them practical for a broad scope of future engineering applications.

Read more

7/23/2024

Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Neural Network for Uncertainty Quantification in Transonic Aerodynamic Loads
Total Score

0

Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Neural Network for Uncertainty Quantification in Transonic Aerodynamic Loads

Andrea Vaiuso, Gabriele Immordino, Marcello Righi, Andrea Da Ronch

Multi-fidelity models are becoming more prevalent in engineering, particularly in aerospace, as they combine both the computational efficiency of low-fidelity models with the high accuracy of higher-fidelity simulations. Various state-of-the-art techniques exist for fusing data from different fidelity sources, including Co-Kriging and transfer learning in neural networks. This paper aims to implement a multi-fidelity Bayesian neural network model that applies transfer learning to fuse data generated by models at different fidelities. Bayesian neural networks use probability distributions over network weights, enabling them to provide predictions along with estimates of their confidence. This approach harnesses the predictive and data fusion capabilities of neural networks while also quantifying uncertainty. The results demonstrate that the multi-fidelity Bayesian model outperforms the state-of-the-art Co-Kriging in terms of overall accuracy and robustness on unseen data.

Read more

7/9/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Multifidelity Surrogate Models: A New Data Fusion Perspective

Daniel N Wilke

Multifidelity surrogate modelling combines data of varying accuracy and cost from different sources. It strategically uses low-fidelity models for rapid evaluations, saving computational resources, and high-fidelity models for detailed refinement. It improves decision-making by addressing uncertainties and surpassing the limits of single-fidelity models, which either oversimplify or are computationally intensive. Blending high-fidelity data for detailed responses with frequent low-fidelity data for quick approximations facilitates design optimisation in various domains. Despite progress in interpolation, regression, enhanced sampling, error estimation, variable fidelity, and data fusion techniques, challenges persist in selecting fidelity levels and developing efficient data fusion methods. This study proposes a new fusion approach to construct multi-fidelity surrogate models by constructing gradient-only surrogates that use only gradients to construct regression surfaces. Results are demonstrated on foundational example problems that isolate and illustrate the fusion approach's efficacy, avoiding the need for complex examples that obfuscate the main concept.

Read more

4/24/2024

Graph Laplacian-based Bayesian Multi-fidelity Modeling
Total Score

0

Graph Laplacian-based Bayesian Multi-fidelity Modeling

Orazio Pinti, Jeremy M. Budd, Franca Hoffmann, Assad A. Oberai

We present a novel probabilistic approach for generating multi-fidelity data while accounting for errors inherent in both low- and high-fidelity data. In this approach a graph Laplacian constructed from the low-fidelity data is used to define a multivariate Gaussian prior density for the coordinates of the true data points. In addition, few high-fidelity data points are used to construct a conjugate likelihood term. Thereafter, Bayes rule is applied to derive an explicit expression for the posterior density which is also multivariate Gaussian. The maximum textit{a posteriori} (MAP) estimate of this density is selected to be the optimal multi-fidelity estimate. It is shown that the MAP estimate and the covariance of the posterior density can be determined through the solution of linear systems of equations. Thereafter, two methods, one based on spectral truncation and another based on a low-rank approximation, are developed to solve these equations efficiently. The multi-fidelity approach is tested on a variety of problems in solid and fluid mechanics with data that represents vectors of quantities of interest and discretized spatial fields in one and two dimensions. The results demonstrate that by utilizing a small fraction of high-fidelity data, the multi-fidelity approach can significantly improve the accuracy of a large collection of low-fidelity data points.

Read more

9/14/2024