Pre-Training Representations of Binary Code Using Contrastive Learning

Overview

• Compiled software is delivered as executable binary code, which is difficult for humans to understand.
• Existing work uses AI models to assist in analyzing source code, but few studies have considered binary code analysis.
• This paper proposes a model called COMBO that incorporates source code and comments into binary code representation learning to improve binary code analysis tasks.

Plain English Explanation

When software is compiled, the original human-readable source code is converted into a binary format that a computer's central processing unit (CPU) can directly execute. This binary code is much more difficult for human engineers to understand and analyze compared to the original source code or natural language.

While researchers have used AI models to help analyze source code, not much work has been done on using AI to assist with binary code analysis. This paper introduces a new AI model called COMBO (COntrastive learning Model for Binary cOde Analysis) that aims to improve binary code analysis by incorporating information from the original source code and comments.

The key idea is to use a contrastive learning approach, which trains the model to recognize patterns and relationships in the data by comparing positive and negative examples. COMBO uses this technique to learn representations of the binary code that capture relevant information, while also incorporating the source code and comments to provide additional context.

The paper evaluates COMBO on three different tasks related to binary code analysis: algorithmic functionality classification, binary code similarity, and vulnerability detection. The results show that COMBO outperforms other state-of-the-art models on these tasks, demonstrating the value of its approach to incorporating multiple sources of information into the binary code representation.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a COntrastive learning Model for Binary cOde Analysis (COMBO) that incorporates source code and comment information into binary code representation learning.

COMBO has three main components:

1. Primary Contrastive Learning: This is the core of the model, which uses a contrastive learning approach to pre-train the representation of the binary code. Contrastive learning trains the model to recognize patterns and relationships in the data by comparing positive and negative examples.

2. Simplex Interpolation: This method is used to incorporate the source code, comments, and binary code into the representation learning process. It allows the model to leverage the semantic information from the source code and comments to improve the binary code representation.

3. Intermediate Representation Learning: This step produces the final binary code embeddings that can be used for various downstream tasks, such as the three evaluated in the paper: algorithmic functionality classification, binary code similarity, and vulnerability detection.

The paper evaluates COMBO on these three tasks and compares its performance to state-of-the-art large-scale language representation models. The results show that COMBO outperforms these models by 5.45% on average, demonstrating the value of incorporating source code and comment information into binary code representation learning.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to binary code analysis by leveraging source code and comments. The use of contrastive learning and the incorporation of multiple sources of information are compelling aspects of the research.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations and areas for further work:

• Scalability: The evaluation is conducted on a relatively small dataset, and it's unclear how well COMBO would scale to larger, more diverse datasets encountered in real-world binary code analysis tasks.
• Interpretability: The paper does not provide much insight into the internal workings of COMBO or how the model arrives at its representations and decisions. Improving the interpretability of the model could be valuable for users who need to understand the reasoning behind the results.
• Generalization: The paper focuses on three specific tasks, but it's unclear how well COMBO's representations would generalize to other binary code analysis tasks or domains. Further research is needed to understand the broader applicability of the approach.

Overall, the paper presents an interesting and promising approach to binary code analysis, but additional research is needed to fully understand the capabilities, limitations, and potential impact of the COMBO model.

Conclusion

This paper introduces COMBO, a COntrastive learning Model for Binary cOde Analysis that incorporates source code and comment information into binary code representation learning. By leveraging multiple sources of information, COMBO achieves superior performance on three key binary code analysis tasks: algorithmic functionality classification, binary code similarity, and vulnerability detection.

The paper's key contribution is demonstrating the value of incorporating source code and comments into binary code analysis, which is a critical task in areas like reverse engineering and computer security where the original source code may not be available. The results suggest that COMBO's approach to representation learning can unlock new capabilities in binary code analysis and inspire further research in this important and challenging domain.