Prediction Instability in Machine Learning Ensembles

Read original: arXiv:2407.03194 - Published 8/27/2024 by Jeremy Kedziora
Total Score

0

🔮

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a framework for analyzing ensemble methods used in probabilistic regression trees.
  • The authors prove a novel theorem that establishes a discontinuity in the ensemble choice as a function of the model parameters.
  • The paper also discusses the implications of this result for the design and evaluation of predictive algorithms under unobserved factors.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a mathematical analysis of ensemble methods, which are techniques that combine multiple machine learning models to improve the overall performance. The authors specifically look at ensemble methods used in probabilistic regression trees, which are a type of machine learning model that can make predictions about continuous quantities.

The key insight from the paper is that the authors prove a theorem that shows there is a discontinuity in how the ensemble method selects the best individual models to include. This means that small changes in the model parameters can lead to sudden, drastic changes in the ensemble composition. This has important implications for how we design and evaluate predictive algorithms that use ensemble methods, as the sudden changes in model selection can lead to unstable or unpredictable performance.

The authors use this result to discuss the tradeoffs between accuracy and energy efficiency when deploying ensemble-based models, as well as how to optimize the ensemble composition under various constraints.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a theoretical framework for analyzing ensemble methods used in probabilistic regression trees. The authors prove an "Ensemble Choice Discontinuity Theorem" that establishes a discontinuity in the ensemble choice as a function of the model parameters. Specifically, they show that small changes in the model parameters can lead to sudden, drastic changes in the set of individual models that are included in the ensemble.

This result has important implications for the robust design and evaluation of predictive algorithms that use ensemble methods. The discontinuity in ensemble composition means that the performance of such algorithms can be highly sensitive to small changes in the underlying models or the environment in which they are deployed.

The authors discuss how this insight can be used to navigate the tradeoffs between accuracy and energy efficiency when deploying ensemble-based models, as well as how to optimize the ensemble composition under various constraints.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of ensemble methods in the context of probabilistic regression trees. The authors' proof of the Ensemble Choice Discontinuity Theorem is technically sound and the implications they draw are well-reasoned.

However, the paper does not address several important practical considerations. For example, it is unclear how the discontinuity phenomenon would manifest in real-world datasets and application scenarios. The authors also do not discuss the potential for mitigating the effects of the discontinuity, such as through robust optimization techniques or adaptive ensemble methods.

Additionally, the paper focuses solely on ensemble methods in the context of probabilistic regression trees. It would be valuable to understand whether the authors' findings extend to other types of machine learning models and ensemble techniques, such as those used in climate model ensembles.

Overall, the paper makes an important theoretical contribution, but further research is needed to fully understand the practical implications and limitations of the authors' findings.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel theoretical framework for analyzing ensemble methods used in probabilistic regression trees. The authors prove a theorem that establishes a discontinuity in the ensemble choice as a function of the model parameters, which has significant implications for the robust design and evaluation of predictive algorithms that rely on ensemble methods.

The authors' findings highlight the need for careful consideration of the tradeoffs between accuracy and efficiency when deploying ensemble-based models, as well as the importance of optimizing the ensemble composition under various constraints. While the paper makes an important theoretical contribution, further research is needed to fully understand the practical implications and potential mitigation strategies for the discontinuity phenomenon.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔮

Total Score

0

Prediction Instability in Machine Learning Ensembles

Jeremy Kedziora

In machine learning ensembles predictions from multiple models are aggregated. Despite widespread use and strong performance of ensembles in applied problems little is known about the mathematical properties of aggregating models and associated consequences for safe, explainable use of such models. In this paper we prove a theorem that shows that any ensemble will exhibit at least one of the following forms of prediction instability. It will either ignore agreement among all underlying models, change its mind when none of the underlying models have done so, or be manipulable through inclusion or exclusion of options it would never actually predict. As a consequence, ensemble aggregation procedures will always need to balance the benefits of information use against the risk of these prediction instabilities. This analysis also sheds light on what specific forms of prediction instability to expect from particular ensemble algorithms; for example popular tree ensembles like random forest, or xgboost will violate basic, intuitive fairness properties. Finally, we show that this can be ameliorated by using consistent models in asymptotic conditions.

Read more

8/27/2024

(Implicit) Ensembles of Ensembles: Epistemic Uncertainty Collapse in Large Models
Total Score

0

(Implicit) Ensembles of Ensembles: Epistemic Uncertainty Collapse in Large Models

Andreas Kirsch

Epistemic uncertainty is crucial for safety-critical applications and out-of-distribution detection tasks. Yet, we uncover a paradoxical phenomenon in deep learning models: an epistemic uncertainty collapse as model complexity increases, challenging the assumption that larger models invariably offer better uncertainty quantification. We propose that this stems from implicit ensembling within large models. To support this hypothesis, we demonstrate epistemic uncertainty collapse empirically across various architectures, from explicit ensembles of ensembles and simple MLPs to state-of-the-art vision models, including ResNets and Vision Transformers -- for the latter, we examine implicit ensemble extraction and decompose larger models into diverse sub-models, recovering epistemic uncertainty. We provide theoretical justification for these phenomena and explore their implications for uncertainty estimation.

Read more

9/5/2024

🛸

Total Score

0

Robust Design and Evaluation of Predictive Algorithms under Unobserved Confounding

Ashesh Rambachan, Amanda Coston, Edward Kennedy

Predictive algorithms inform consequential decisions in settings where the outcome is selectively observed given choices made by human decision makers. We propose a unified framework for the robust design and evaluation of predictive algorithms in selectively observed data. We impose general assumptions on how much the outcome may vary on average between unselected and selected units conditional on observed covariates and identified nuisance parameters, formalizing popular empirical strategies for imputing missing data such as proxy outcomes and instrumental variables. We develop debiased machine learning estimators for the bounds on a large class of predictive performance estimands, such as the conditional likelihood of the outcome, a predictive algorithm's mean square error, true/false positive rate, and many others, under these assumptions. In an administrative dataset from a large Australian financial institution, we illustrate how varying assumptions on unobserved confounding leads to meaningful changes in default risk predictions and evaluations of credit scores across sensitive groups.

Read more

5/21/2024

↗️

Total Score

0

Ensembles of Probabilistic Regression Trees

Alexandre Seiller (APTIKAL), 'Eric Gaussier (APTIKAL), Emilie Devijver (APTIKAL), Marianne Clausel (IECL), Sami Alkhoury

Tree-based ensemble methods such as random forests, gradient-boosted trees, and Bayesianadditive regression trees have been successfully used for regression problems in many applicationsand research studies. In this paper, we study ensemble versions of probabilisticregression trees that provide smooth approximations of the objective function by assigningeach observation to each region with respect to a probability distribution. We prove thatthe ensemble versions of probabilistic regression trees considered are consistent, and experimentallystudy their bias-variance trade-off and compare them with the state-of-the-art interms of performance prediction.

Read more

6/21/2024