Privacy-Aware Visual Language Models
2405.17423
3
0
💬
Abstract
This paper aims to advance our understanding of how Visual Language Models (VLMs) handle privacy-sensitive information, a crucial concern as these technologies become integral to everyday life. To this end, we introduce a new benchmark PrivBench, which contains images from 8 sensitive categories such as passports, or fingerprints. We evaluate 10 state-of-the-art VLMs on this benchmark and observe a generally limited understanding of privacy, highlighting a significant area for model improvement. Based on this we introduce PrivTune, a new instruction-tuning dataset aimed at equipping VLMs with knowledge about visual privacy. By tuning two pretrained VLMs, TinyLLaVa and MiniGPT-v2, on this small dataset, we achieve strong gains in their ability to recognize sensitive content, outperforming even GPT4-V. At the same time, we show that privacy-tuning only minimally affects the VLMs performance on standard benchmarks such as VQA. Overall, this paper lays out a crucial challenge for making VLMs effective in handling real-world data safely and provides a simple recipe that takes the first step towards building privacy-aware VLMs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces a new benchmark called PrivBench to evaluate how well state-of-the-art Visual Language Models (VLMs) handle privacy-sensitive information.
- The authors evaluate 10 VLMs on PrivBench and find a generally limited understanding of privacy, highlighting a significant area for model improvement.
- To address this, the authors introduce PrivTune, a new instruction-tuning dataset aimed at equipping VLMs with knowledge about visual privacy.
- By tuning two pretrained VLMs on PrivTune, the authors achieve strong gains in the models' ability to recognize sensitive content, outperforming even GPT4-V.
- The paper lays out a crucial challenge for making VLMs effective in handling real-world data safely and provides a simple recipe for building privacy-aware VLMs.
Plain English Explanation
As visual language models (VLMs) become more prevalent in our daily lives, it's crucial to understand how they handle sensitive information like personal documents or biometric data. The researchers created a new benchmark called PrivBench that contains images from 8 sensitive categories, such as passports or fingerprints. They then evaluated 10 state-of-the-art VLMs on this benchmark and found that the models generally had a limited understanding of privacy.
To address this issue, the researchers introduced PrivTune, a new dataset designed to help VLMs learn about visual privacy. By fine-tuning two existing VLMs, TinyLLaVa and MiniGPT-v2, on the PrivTune dataset, the researchers were able to significantly improve the models' ability to recognize sensitive content, even outperforming the powerful GPT4-V model.
Importantly, the researchers showed that this privacy-focused fine-tuning had only a minimal impact on the VLMs' performance on standard benchmarks, such as Visual Question Answering (VQA). This suggests that it's possible to make VLMs more privacy-aware without compromising their overall capabilities.
Overall, this research highlights a crucial challenge in developing VLMs that can handle real-world data safely and provides a practical approach for building more privacy-conscious models.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new benchmark called PrivBench, which contains images from 8 sensitive categories, such as passports, fingerprints, and bank cards. The authors evaluate 10 state-of-the-art VLMs, including VIT-B/16, VisualBERT, and CLIP, on this benchmark and find that the models generally have a limited understanding of privacy-sensitive content.
To address this, the researchers introduce PrivTune, a new instruction-tuning dataset designed to equip VLMs with knowledge about visual privacy. By fine-tuning two pretrained VLMs, TinyLLaVa and MiniGPT-v2, on the PrivTune dataset, the authors achieve strong gains in the models' ability to recognize sensitive content, outperforming even the powerful GPT4-V model.
The authors also show that this privacy-focused fine-tuning has only a minimal impact on the VLMs' performance on standard benchmarks, such as VQA. This suggests that it's possible to make VLMs more privacy-aware without significantly compromising their overall capabilities.
Critical Analysis
The paper highlights an important challenge in the development of VLMs, as these models become increasingly integral to everyday life. The authors' introduction of the PrivBench benchmark is a valuable contribution, as it provides a standardized way to evaluate how well VLMs handle privacy-sensitive information.
While the authors' approach of using instruction-tuning to improve the privacy-awareness of VLMs is promising, the paper does not address some potential limitations or concerns. For example, the authors do not discuss the robustness of the privacy-tuned models to adversarial attacks or other attempts to circumvent the privacy protections.
Additionally, the authors' evaluation is limited to a small set of 10 VLMs, and it would be interesting to see how a broader range of models, including more recently developed architectures, would perform on the PrivBench benchmark. The paper also does not explore the potential tradeoffs between privacy-awareness and other desirable model capabilities, such as generalization or efficiency.
Overall, this paper lays a strong foundation for future research on building privacy-aware VLMs, but there is still significant work to be done to ensure these models can be deployed safely and effectively in real-world applications. Researchers and developers should continue to think critically about the safety and alignment of vision-language models as they become more widely used.
Conclusion
This paper presents a crucial step forward in understanding and improving the privacy-awareness of visual language models. By introducing the PrivBench benchmark and the PrivTune instruction-tuning dataset, the authors have provided valuable tools and insights for the research community.
The findings that state-of-the-art VLMs have a generally limited understanding of privacy-sensitive information, and that targeted fine-tuning can significantly improve this capability, highlight an important area for model development and refinement. As VLMs become more ubiquitous in our daily lives, ensuring they can handle sensitive data safely and responsibly will be essential for realizing the full potential of these powerful vision-language models.
The paper's simple recipe for building privacy-aware VLMs provides a promising starting point, but there is still much work to be done to address the challenging issues around the safety and alignment of these increasingly influential AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
PrivLM-Bench: A Multi-level Privacy Evaluation Benchmark for Language Models
Haoran Li, Dadi Guo, Donghao Li, Wei Fan, Qi Hu, Xin Liu, Chunkit Chan, Duanyi Yao, Yuan Yao, Yangqiu Song
0
0
The rapid development of language models (LMs) brings unprecedented accessibility and usage for both models and users. On the one hand, powerful LMs achieve state-of-the-art performance over numerous downstream NLP tasks. On the other hand, more and more attention is paid to unrestricted model accesses that may bring malicious privacy risks of data leakage. To address these issues, many recent works propose privacy-preserving language models (PPLMs) with differential privacy (DP). Unfortunately, different DP implementations make it challenging for a fair comparison among existing PPLMs. In this paper, we present PrivLM-Bench, a multi-perspective privacy evaluation benchmark to empirically and intuitively quantify the privacy leakage of LMs. Instead of only reporting DP parameters, PrivLM-Bench sheds light on the neglected inference data privacy during actual usage. PrivLM-Bench first clearly defines multi-faceted privacy objectives. Then, PrivLM-Bench constructs a unified pipeline to perform private fine-tuning. Lastly, PrivLM-Bench performs existing privacy attacks on LMs with pre-defined privacy objectives as the empirical evaluation results. The empirical attack results are used to fairly and intuitively evaluate the privacy leakage of various PPLMs. We conduct extensive experiments on three datasets of GLUE for mainstream LMs.
6/4/2024
🤯
Private Attribute Inference from Images with Vision-Language Models
Batuhan Tomekc{c}e, Mark Vero, Robin Staab, Martin Vechev
0
0
As large language models (LLMs) become ubiquitous in our daily tasks and digital interactions, associated privacy risks are increasingly in focus. While LLM privacy research has primarily focused on the leakage of model training data, it has recently been shown that the increase in models' capabilities has enabled LLMs to make accurate privacy-infringing inferences from previously unseen texts. With the rise of multimodal vision-language models (VLMs), capable of understanding both images and text, a pertinent question is whether such results transfer to the previously unexplored domain of benign images posted online. To investigate the risks associated with the image reasoning capabilities of newly emerging VLMs, we compile an image dataset with human-annotated labels of the image owner's personal attributes. In order to understand the additional privacy risk posed by VLMs beyond traditional human attribute recognition, our dataset consists of images where the inferable private attributes do not stem from direct depictions of humans. On this dataset, we evaluate the inferential capabilities of 7 state-of-the-art VLMs, finding that they can infer various personal attributes at up to 77.6% accuracy. Concerningly, we observe that accuracy scales with the general capabilities of the models, implying that future models can be misused as stronger adversaries, establishing an imperative for the development of adequate defenses.
4/17/2024
💬
Identifying and Mitigating Privacy Risks Stemming from Language Models: A Survey
Victoria Smith, Ali Shahin Shamsabadi, Carolyn Ashurst, Adrian Weller
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown greatly enhanced performance in recent years, attributed to increased size and extensive training data. This advancement has led to widespread interest and adoption across industries and the public. However, training data memorization in Machine Learning models scales with model size, particularly concerning for LLMs. Memorized text sequences have the potential to be directly leaked from LLMs, posing a serious threat to data privacy. Various techniques have been developed to attack LLMs and extract their training data. As these models continue to grow, this issue becomes increasingly critical. To help researchers and policymakers understand the state of knowledge around privacy attacks and mitigations, including where more work is needed, we present the first SoK on data privacy for LLMs. We (i) identify a taxonomy of salient dimensions where attacks differ on LLMs, (ii) systematize existing attacks, using our taxonomy of dimensions to highlight key trends, (iii) survey existing mitigation strategies, highlighting their strengths and limitations, and (iv) identify key gaps, demonstrating open problems and areas for concern.
6/19/2024
💬
Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Models
Siddharth Karamcheti, Suraj Nair, Ashwin Balakrishna, Percy Liang, Thomas Kollar, Dorsa Sadigh
0
0
Visually-conditioned language models (VLMs) have seen growing adoption in applications such as visual dialogue, scene understanding, and robotic task planning; adoption that has fueled a wealth of new models such as LLaVa, InstructBLIP, and PaLI-3. Despite the volume of new releases, key design decisions around image preprocessing, architecture, and optimization are under-explored, making it challenging to understand what factors account for model performance $-$ a challenge further complicated by the lack of objective, consistent evaluations. To address these gaps, we first compile a suite of standardized evaluations spanning visual question answering, object localization, and challenge sets that probe properties such as hallucination; evaluations that provide fine-grained insight VLM capabilities. Second, we rigorously investigate VLMs along key design axes, including pretrained visual representations and training from base vs. instruct-tuned language models, amongst others. We couple our analysis with three resource contributions: (1) a unified framework for evaluating VLMs, (2) optimized, flexible training code, and (3) checkpoints for all models, including a family of VLMs at the 7-13B scale that strictly outperform InstructBLIP and LLaVa v1.5, the state-of-the-art in open VLMs.
5/31/2024