Scaling Large-Language-Model-based Multi-Agent Collaboration
2406.07155
0
0
Abstract
Pioneering advancements in large language model-powered agents have underscored the design pattern of multi-agent collaboration, demonstrating that collective intelligence can surpass the capabilities of each individual. Inspired by the neural scaling law, which posits that increasing neurons leads to emergent abilities, this study investigates whether a similar principle applies to increasing agents in multi-agent collaboration. Technically, we propose multi-agent collaboration networks (MacNet), which utilize directed acyclic graphs to organize agents and streamline their interactive reasoning via topological ordering, with solutions derived from their dialogues. Extensive experiments show that MacNet consistently outperforms baseline models, enabling effective agent collaboration across various network topologies and supporting cooperation among more than a thousand agents. Notably, we observed a small-world collaboration phenomenon, where topologies resembling small-world properties achieved superior performance. Additionally, we identified a collaborative scaling law, indicating that normalized solution quality follows a logistic growth pattern as scaling agents, with collaborative emergence occurring much earlier than previously observed instances of neural emergence. The code and data will be available at https://github.com/OpenBMB/ChatDev.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores ways to scale up large language model-based multi-agent collaboration systems.
- It examines related work in areas like neural scaling laws for graphs, collaboration mechanisms for LLM agents, and observational scaling laws for language model performance.
- The paper proposes a multi-agent collaboration framework and evaluates it through experiments.
- Key insights include the importance of handling scale, coordination, and knowledge sharing among agents.
Plain English Explanation
This paper looks at how to make large language model-based systems that involve multiple AI agents work together more effectively. The researchers examined previous work on things like how the performance of language models changes as they get bigger, and how AI agents can collaborate.
The paper then describes a new framework the researchers developed for coordinating multiple AI agents that use large language models. The key ideas are to make sure the agents can handle working at a large scale, communicate and coordinate with each other properly, and effectively share knowledge.
The researchers tested out this new framework through experiments. The results provide insights into the important factors for scaling up these kinds of multi-agent systems that use powerful language models.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by reviewing related work, including research on neural scaling laws for graphs, collaboration mechanisms for LLM agents, and observational scaling laws for language model performance. This provides important context for understanding the challenges involved in scaling up multi-agent systems that leverage large language models.
The core of the paper is the proposed multi-agent collaboration framework. This involves mechanisms for agent coordination, knowledge sharing, and handling scale. The agents use large language models to communicate, reason, and complete tasks. But the framework is designed to allow many agents to work together effectively, even as the system scales up in size.
The researchers conducted experiments to evaluate their framework. This included testing scenarios with varying numbers of agents, task complexities, and other variables. The results showed the importance of factors like communication protocols, knowledge representation, and load balancing for achieving good performance at scale.
Critical Analysis
The paper does a thorough job of situating its work within the relevant literature and identifying key challenges in scaling up multi-agent systems with large language models. The proposed framework seems well-designed to address issues like coordination, knowledge sharing, and handling scale.
However, the paper acknowledges some limitations. For example, it notes that the experiments were conducted in simulated environments, and real-world deployment may introduce additional complexities. There is also the question of how well the framework would generalize to more open-ended or dynamic multi-agent scenarios.
Additionally, while the paper highlights the importance of factors like communication protocols and knowledge representation, it doesn't provide in-depth analysis of the tradeoffs or design choices involved. Further research could explore these areas more deeply.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in scaling up collaborative AI systems that leverage the power of large language models. The insights and framework it provides could help pave the way for more sophisticated and capable multi-agent systems in the future.
Conclusion
This paper tackles the challenge of scaling up multi-agent collaboration systems that use large language models. It proposes a framework with mechanisms for agent coordination, knowledge sharing, and handling scale. Experiments demonstrate the importance of factors like communication protocols and load balancing for achieving good performance as the system grows.
While the paper has some limitations, it represents a significant contribution to the field of collaborative AI. The insights and approaches it provides could help enable more powerful and flexible multi-agent systems that can tackle increasingly complex real-world problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Multi-Agent Software Development through Cross-Team Collaboration
Zhuoyun Du, Chen Qian, Wei Liu, Zihao Xie, Yifei Wang, Yufan Dang, Weize Chen, Cheng Yang
0
0
The latest breakthroughs in Large Language Models (LLMs), eg., ChatDev, have catalyzed profound transformations, particularly through multi-agent collaboration for software development. LLM agents can collaborate in teams like humans, and follow the waterfall model to sequentially work on requirements analysis, development, review, testing, and other phases to perform autonomous software generation. However, for an agent team, each phase in a single development process yields only one possible outcome. This results in the completion of only one development chain, thereby losing the opportunity to explore multiple potential decision paths within the solution space. Consequently, this may lead to obtaining suboptimal results. To address this challenge, we introduce Cross-Team Collaboration (CTC), a scalable multi-team framework that enables orchestrated teams to jointly propose various decisions and communicate with their insights in a cross-team collaboration environment for superior content generation. Experimental results in software development reveal a notable increase in quality compared to state-of-the-art baselines, underscoring the efficacy of our framework. The significant improvements in story generation demonstrate the promising generalization ability of our framework across various domains. We anticipate that our work will guide LLM agents towards a cross-team paradigm and contribute to their significant growth in but not limited to software development. The code and data will be available at https://github.com/OpenBMB/ChatDev.
6/14/2024
Problem-Solving in Language Model Networks
Ciaran Regan, Alexandre Gournail, Mizuki Oka
0
0
To improve the reasoning and question-answering capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), several multi-agent approaches have been introduced. While these methods enhance performance, the application of collective intelligence-based approaches to complex network structures and the dynamics of agent interactions remain underexplored. This work extends the concept of multi-agent debate to more general network topologies, measuring the question-answering accuracy, influence, consensus, and the effects of bias on the collective. The results show that random networks perform similarly to fully connected networks despite using significantly fewer tokens. Furthermore, a strong consensus among agents in correlates with correct answers, whereas divided responses typically indicate incorrect answers. Analysing the influence of the agents reveals a balance between self-reflection and interconnectedness; self-reflection aids when local interactions are incorrect, and local interactions aid when the agent itself is incorrect. Additionally, bias plays a strong role in system performance with correctly biased hub nodes boosting performance. These insights suggest that using random networks or scale-free networks with knowledgeable agents placed in central positions can enhance the overall performance of multi-agent systems.
6/19/2024
MultiAgent Collaboration Attack: Investigating Adversarial Attacks in Large Language Model Collaborations via Debate
Alfonso Amayuelas, Xianjun Yang, Antonis Antoniades, Wenyue Hua, Liangming Pan, William Wang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown exceptional results on current benchmarks when working individually. The advancement in their capabilities, along with a reduction in parameter size and inference times, has facilitated the use of these models as agents, enabling interactions among multiple models to execute complex tasks. Such collaborations offer several advantages, including the use of specialized models (e.g. coding), improved confidence through multiple computations, and enhanced divergent thinking, leading to more diverse outputs. Thus, the collaborative use of language models is expected to grow significantly in the coming years. In this work, we evaluate the behavior of a network of models collaborating through debate under the influence of an adversary. We introduce pertinent metrics to assess the adversary's effectiveness, focusing on system accuracy and model agreement. Our findings highlight the importance of a model's persuasive ability in influencing others. Additionally, we explore inference-time methods to generate more compelling arguments and evaluate the potential of prompt-based mitigation as a defensive strategy.
6/27/2024
Neural Scaling Laws on Graphs
Jingzhe Liu, Haitao Mao, Zhikai Chen, Tong Zhao, Neil Shah, Jiliang Tang
0
0
Deep graph models (e.g., graph neural networks and graph transformers) have become important techniques for leveraging knowledge across various types of graphs. Yet, the scaling properties of deep graph models have not been systematically investigated, casting doubt on the feasibility of achieving large graph models through enlarging the model and dataset sizes. In this work, we delve into neural scaling laws on graphs from both model and data perspectives. We first verify the validity of such laws on graphs, establishing formulations to describe the scaling behaviors. For model scaling, we investigate the phenomenon of scaling law collapse and identify overfitting as the potential reason. Moreover, we reveal that the model depth of deep graph models can impact the model scaling behaviors, which differ from observations in other domains such as CV and NLP. For data scaling, we suggest that the number of graphs can not effectively metric the graph data volume in scaling law since the sizes of different graphs are highly irregular. Instead, we reform the data scaling law with the number of edges as the metric to address the irregular graph sizes. We further demonstrate the reformed law offers a unified view of the data scaling behaviors for various fundamental graph tasks including node classification, link prediction, and graph classification. This work provides valuable insights into neural scaling laws on graphs, which can serve as an essential step toward large graph models.
6/11/2024