Unveiling the Lexical Sensitivity of LLMs: Combinatorial Optimization for Prompt Enhancement
2405.20701
0
0
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional instruct-following ability to complete various downstream tasks. Although this impressive ability makes LLMs flexible task solvers, their performance in solving tasks also heavily relies on instructions. In this paper, we reveal that LLMs are over-sensitive to lexical variations in task instructions, even when the variations are imperceptible to humans. By providing models with neighborhood instructions, which are closely situated in the latent representation space and differ by only one semantically similar word, the performance on downstream tasks can be vastly different. Following this property, we propose a black-box Combinatorial Optimization framework for Prompt Lexical Enhancement (COPLE). COPLE performs iterative lexical optimization according to the feedback from a batch of proxy tasks, using a search strategy related to word influence. Experiments show that even widely-used human-crafted prompts for current benchmarks suffer from the lexical sensitivity of models, and COPLE recovers the declined model ability in both instruct-following and solving downstream tasks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the lexical sensitivity of large language models (LLMs) and explores using combinatorial optimization to enhance prompts for these models.
- The researchers aim to better understand how the specific choice of words in a prompt can impact the output of an LLM, and develop techniques to optimize prompts for improved performance.
- The paper presents a novel combinatorial optimization approach to prompt engineering, with experiments demonstrating the effectiveness of this method for enhancing LLM outputs.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have shown remarkable capabilities in tasks like language generation, translation, and question answering. However, the precise wording of the prompts used to interact with these models can have a significant impact on their performance. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/language-models-as-black-box-optimizers-vision">LLMs can be viewed as complex "black box" optimizers</a>, and understanding how to effectively prompt them is an important challenge.
This paper explores the "lexical sensitivity" of LLMs - how the specific choice of words in a prompt can affect the model's output. The researchers developed a combinatorial optimization approach to systematically identify the best words to include in a prompt, in order to enhance the quality and relevance of the model's response. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/revisiting-opro-limitations-small-scale-llms-as">This builds on prior work on prompt optimization for smaller language models</a>, but tackles the increased complexity of prompting large-scale LLMs.
Through various experiments, the paper demonstrates that this combinatorial optimization technique can significantly improve the performance of LLMs on a range of tasks, from generating coherent and relevant text to answering questions more accurately. The findings suggest that prompt engineering is a crucial skill for getting the most out of these powerful language models, and that systematic optimization approaches can be highly effective.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by highlighting the importance of prompt engineering for LLMs, noting that the specific wording of prompts can have a substantial impact on model outputs. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/towards-optimizing-large-language-models">The authors frame LLMs as complex optimization problems</a>, where the prompt acts as the input and the model's response is the output.
To investigate the lexical sensitivity of LLMs, the researchers develop a combinatorial optimization approach for prompt engineering. This involves systematically evaluating different combinations of words in the prompt, with the goal of identifying the optimal wording to elicit the best model response. The optimization process considers factors like semantic coherence, relevance, and fluency.
Experiments are conducted on several popular LLMs, including GPT-3, using a variety of task domains like text generation, question answering, and sentiment analysis. The results demonstrate that the combinatorial optimization technique can significantly improve model performance compared to manually crafted prompts or other prompt engineering methods.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/large-language-models-as-optimizers">The paper also discusses the broader implications of viewing LLMs as optimization problems</a>, and how this perspective can inform the development of more effective prompting strategies and architectures. Additionally, the authors explore the <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/psychometric-predictive-power-large-language-models">predictive power of LLMs</a> and how the lexical sensitivity uncovered in this research could be leveraged for various applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling and well-designed study on the lexical sensitivity of LLMs and the use of combinatorial optimization for prompt engineering. The researchers have clearly put a lot of thought and effort into developing a robust experimental framework and demonstrating the effectiveness of their approach.
One potential limitation is the scope of the experiments, which primarily focus on a few popular LLM architectures and a limited set of task domains. While the results are convincing, it would be interesting to see how the combinatorial optimization technique performs on a wider range of models and applications.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying mechanisms and biases that may be driving the lexical sensitivity observed in the LLMs. A more thorough exploration of the model's inner workings and how they respond to different prompt variations could provide valuable insights for the field.
Overall, this research makes an important contribution to our understanding of LLM behavior and the potential of prompt engineering. The findings suggest that systematic optimization of prompts could be a powerful technique for leveraging the full capabilities of these models, and the proposed approach provides a solid foundation for future work in this area.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel combinatorial optimization approach for enhancing the performance of large language models (LLMs) through prompt engineering. The researchers demonstrate that the specific wording of prompts can have a significant impact on the outputs of LLMs, and that systematically optimizing prompts can lead to substantial improvements in tasks like text generation, question answering, and sentiment analysis.
The insights from this work have important implications for the field of natural language processing and the development of more effective prompting strategies for LLMs. By viewing these models as complex optimization problems, the paper opens up new avenues for prompt engineering and the design of more sophisticated language model architectures. As LLMs continue to grow in capability and influence, techniques like the one described here will be crucial for unlocking their full potential and ensuring they are used in the most effective and responsible ways.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Language Models as Black-Box Optimizers for Vision-Language Models
Shihong Liu, Zhiqiu Lin, Samuel Yu, Ryan Lee, Tiffany Ling, Deepak Pathak, Deva Ramanan
0
0
Vision-language models (VLMs) pre-trained on web-scale datasets have demonstrated remarkable capabilities on downstream tasks when fine-tuned with minimal data. However, many VLMs rely on proprietary data and are not open-source, which restricts the use of white-box approaches for fine-tuning. As such, we aim to develop a black-box approach to optimize VLMs through natural language prompts, thereby avoiding the need to access model parameters, feature embeddings, or even output logits. We propose employing chat-based LLMs to search for the best text prompt for VLMs. Specifically, we adopt an automatic hill-climbing procedure that converges to an effective prompt by evaluating the performance of current prompts and asking LLMs to refine them based on textual feedback, all within a conversational process without human-in-the-loop. In a challenging 1-shot image classification setup, our simple approach surpasses the white-box continuous prompting method (CoOp) by an average of 1.5% across 11 datasets including ImageNet. Our approach also outperforms both human-engineered and LLM-generated prompts. We highlight the advantage of conversational feedback that incorporates both positive and negative prompts, suggesting that LLMs can utilize the implicit gradient direction in textual feedback for a more efficient search. In addition, we find that the text prompts generated through our strategy are not only more interpretable but also transfer well across different VLM architectures in a black-box manner. Lastly, we apply our framework to optimize the state-of-the-art black-box VLM (DALL-E 3) for text-to-image generation, prompt inversion, and personalization.
5/15/2024
Revisiting OPRO: The Limitations of Small-Scale LLMs as Optimizers
Tuo Zhang, Jinyue Yuan, Salman Avestimehr
0
0
Numerous recent works aim to enhance the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) through strategic prompting. In particular, the Optimization by PROmpting (OPRO) approach provides state-of-the-art performance by leveraging LLMs as optimizers where the optimization task is to find instructions that maximize the task accuracy. In this paper, we revisit OPRO for automated prompting with relatively small-scale LLMs, such as LLaMa-2 family and Mistral 7B. Our investigation reveals that OPRO shows limited effectiveness in small-scale LLMs, with limited inference capabilities constraining optimization ability. We suggest future automatic prompting engineering to consider both model capabilities and computational costs. Additionally, for small-scale LLMs, we recommend direct instructions that clearly outline objectives and methodologies as robust prompt baselines, ensuring efficient and effective prompt engineering in ongoing research.
5/17/2024
Optimizing Instructions and Demonstrations for Multi-Stage Language Model Programs
Krista Opsahl-Ong, Michael J Ryan, Josh Purtell, David Broman, Christopher Potts, Matei Zaharia, Omar Khattab
0
0
Language Model Programs, i.e. sophisticated pipelines of modular language model (LM) calls, are increasingly advancing NLP tasks, but they require crafting prompts that are jointly effective for all modules. We study prompt optimization for LM programs, i.e. how to update these prompts to maximize a downstream metric without access to module-level labels or gradients. To make this tractable, we factorize our problem into optimizing the free-form instructions and few-shot demonstrations of every module and introduce several strategies to craft task-grounded instructions and navigate credit assignment across modules. Our strategies include (i) program- and data-aware techniques for proposing effective instructions, (ii) a stochastic mini-batch evaluation function for learning a surrogate model of our objective, and (iii) a meta-optimization procedure in which we refine how LMs construct proposals over time. Using these insights we develop MIPRO, a novel optimizer that outperforms baselines on five of six diverse LM programs using a best-in-class open-source model (Llama-3-8B), by as high as 12.9% accuracy. We will release our new optimizers and benchmark in DSPy at https://github.com/stanfordnlp/dspy
6/18/2024
🔎
How You Prompt Matters! Even Task-Oriented Constraints in Instructions Affect LLM-Generated Text Detection
Ryuto Koike, Masahiro Kaneko, Naoaki Okazaki
0
0
To combat the misuse of Large Language Models (LLMs), many recent studies have presented LLM-generated-text detectors with promising performance. When users instruct LLMs to generate texts, the instruction can include different constraints depending on the user's need. However, most recent studies do not cover such diverse instruction patterns when creating datasets for LLM detection. In this paper, we reveal that even task-oriented constraints -- constraints that would naturally be included in an instruction and are not related to detection-evasion -- cause existing powerful detectors to have a large variance in detection performance. We focus on student essay writing as a realistic domain and manually create task-oriented constraints based on several factors for essay quality. Our experiments show that the standard deviation (SD) of current detector performance on texts generated by an instruction with such a constraint is significantly larger (up to an SD of 14.4 F1-score) than that by generating texts multiple times or paraphrasing the instruction. We also observe an overall trend where the constraints can make LLM detection more challenging than without them. Finally, our analysis indicates that the high instruction-following ability of LLMs fosters the large impact of such constraints on detection performance.
6/13/2024