Promoting AI Competencies for Medical Students: A Scoping Review on Frameworks, Programs, and Tools

Overview

• As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more common in healthcare, it's crucial for doctors to understand and use AI safely and ethically.
• A review of 1,699 research papers found 18 studies proposing frameworks and 11 studies documenting real-world instruction for integrating AI into medical education.
• The researchers found that current efforts focus more on AI evaluation and ethics rather than technical topics like data science and coding.
• Challenges include a lack of guidelines for AI literacy, doubts about the clinical value of AI, and a shortage of qualified instructors.
• The researchers propose an AI literacy framework with four dimensions: Foundational, Practical, Experimental, and Ethical.

Plain English Explanation

As artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare becomes more common, it's important for doctors to understand how to use it safely and ethically. The researchers reviewed nearly 1,700 research papers and found that while there are some efforts to teach AI in medical schools, the focus is often on evaluating AI and discussing the ethics, rather than the technical details like data science and coding.

The researchers identified several challenges with integrating AI training into medical education. There aren't clear guidelines for what level of "AI literacy" medical students should have. Some people also doubt whether AI will provide enough clinical value to justify the time spent teaching it. And there's a shortage of qualified instructors who can teach AI effectively.

To address these issues, the researchers propose a framework for AI education in medical schools. They break down AI literacy into four key areas: Foundational knowledge, Practical application, Experimental skills, and Ethical considerations. By tailoring the learning objectives to different stages of medical education, the researchers hope to provide a roadmap for developing practical and relevant AI training for future doctors.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a scoping review of 1,699 articles published between January 2016 and June 2024 to identify studies on integrating AI into medical education. They found 18 studies proposing guiding frameworks and 11 studies documenting real-world instruction.

The analysis revealed that current efforts tend to focus more on topics like AI evaluation and ethics, rather than technical subjects like data science and coding. The researchers identified several key challenges, including:

1. Lack of guidelines to define AI literacy competencies for medical students
2. Perceived lack of proven clinical value of AI
3. Scarcity of qualified instructors to teach AI effectively

To address these gaps, the researchers propose an AI literacy framework with four dimensions:

1. Foundational: Basic understanding of AI concepts and technologies
2. Practical: Ability to apply AI tools and techniques in clinical practice
3. Experimental: Skills to evaluate, validate, and interpret AI-based clinical solutions
4. Ethical: Knowledge of ethical principles and guidelines for the responsible use of AI

The researchers suggest tailoring the learning objectives for each dimension to the pre-clinical, clinical, and clinical research stages of medical education. This approach aims to provide a roadmap for developing practical and relevant AI education strategies to build an AI-competent healthcare workforce.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that the proposed AI literacy framework may require greater clinical relevance and personalization to suit the diverse interests and career trajectories of medical students. They also note that current efforts tend to emphasize AI evaluation and ethics over technical topics, which may not adequately prepare students for the practical application of AI in clinical practice.

Additionally, the researchers highlight the challenge of a perceived lack of proven clinical value of AI, which could hinder the integration of AI education into already-crowded medical curricula. They suggest that further research is needed to demonstrate the tangible benefits of AI-enabled healthcare solutions to justify the investment in AI training for medical students.

The scarcity of qualified instructors capable of teaching AI effectively is another significant hurdle identified in the paper. Addressing this issue may require collaboration between medical schools, technology companies, and AI experts to develop training programs and resources for faculty.

Conclusion

As AI increasingly becomes a part of clinical workflows, this review highlights the critical need to integrate AI literacy into medical education. By proposing a comprehensive framework that spans foundational knowledge, practical application, experimental skills, and ethical considerations, the researchers provide a roadmap for developing effective AI training strategies for future healthcare providers. Addressing the identified challenges and ensuring that AI education is relevant, personalized, and clinically meaningful will be crucial for building an AI-competent healthcare workforce capable of delivering safe and ethical patient care.