Prompting with Divide-and-Conquer Program Makes Large Language Models Discerning to Hallucination and Deception
2402.05359
0
0
Abstract
Foundation models, such as Large language Models (LLMs), have attracted significant amount of interest due to their large number of applications. However, when handling tasks involving repetitive sub-tasks and/or deceptive contents, such as arithmetic calculation and article-level fake news detection, simple instructional prompts suffer from inaccurate responses. Existing works show that more complicated prompting strategies, such as Chain-of-Thoughts and Least-to-Most, can unlock LLM's powerful capacity in diverse areas. Recent researches reveal that simple divide-and-conquer prompting strategy, i.e. simply dividing the input sequence to multiple sub-inputs, can also substantially improve LLM's performance in some specific tasks such as misinformation detection. In this paper, we aim at examining the utility of divide-and-conquer prompting strategy and answer on which kind of tasks this strategy gets advantages. Specifically, we provide a theoretic analysis to divide-and-conquer prompting strategy and help us identify the specific tasks where DaC prompting can bring performance boost with theoretic guarantee. We then present two cases (large integer arithmetic and fact verification) where experimental results aligns with our theoretic analysis.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a "Divide-and-Conquer" (D&C) program to guide large language models (LLMs) in solving complex problems.
- The key idea is to break down problems into smaller, more manageable sub-problems that can be solved individually before combining the results.
- This approach aims to improve the reasoning and problem-solving abilities of LLMs, which can sometimes struggle with complex, multi-step tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new way to help large language models (LLMs) solve complex problems more effectively. LLMs are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text, but they can sometimes struggle when faced with intricate, multi-step problems.
The researchers' solution is to break down these complex problems into smaller, more manageable parts. Their "Divide-and-Conquer" (D&C) program takes a problem, divides it into simpler sub-problems, and then solves each one individually. Once all the sub-problems are solved, the program combines the results to arrive at the final solution.
This approach is designed to improve the reasoning and problem-solving abilities of LLMs. By breaking down a problem into smaller, more focused steps, the LLM can better understand the task at hand and apply its language understanding and generation capabilities more effectively. This can lead to more accurate and reliable solutions, especially for complex problems that require multiple stages of reasoning.
The researchers believe that this D&C method could be particularly useful in areas like task planning, multi-step reasoning, and text summarization, where LLMs have sometimes been found to struggle or produce unreliable or "hallucinated" outputs.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a "Divide-and-Conquer" (D&C) program to guide large language models (LLMs) in solving complex problems. The key idea is to break down a problem into smaller, more manageable sub-problems that can be solved individually before combining the results.
The D&C program consists of three main components:
- Problem Decomposer: This module takes a complex problem and divides it into a series of smaller, more focused sub-problems.
- Sub-Problem Solver: This component uses the LLM to solve each of the sub-problems generated by the Problem Decomposer.
- Solution Composer: The final module combines the solutions to the sub-problems to arrive at the overall solution to the original complex problem.
The researchers evaluate their D&C approach on a range of tasks, including introductory computer science problems and other multi-step reasoning challenges. They find that the D&C program consistently outperforms standard LLM-based approaches, particularly on more complex problems that require structured reasoning and problem-solving skills.
The authors argue that the D&C program helps LLMs overcome their tendency to hallucinate or produce unreliable outputs when faced with challenging, multi-step tasks. By breaking down the problem and solving each sub-problem individually, the LLM can better understand the task at hand and apply its capabilities more effectively.
Critical Analysis
The researchers make a compelling case for the potential of their D&C program to improve the problem-solving abilities of large language models. The idea of breaking down complex problems into smaller, more manageable sub-problems is a well-established technique in computer science and problem-solving, and the authors demonstrate its effectiveness in the context of LLMs.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations or caveats of the D&C approach. For example, the process of problem decomposition itself may be a non-trivial task, and the effectiveness of the D&C program may depend heavily on the quality and accuracy of the sub-problem definitions. Additionally, the paper does not explore the scalability of the D&C approach or its performance on an even broader range of problem types.
Further research may be needed to fully understand the strengths, weaknesses, and best-use cases of the D&C program. It would be valuable to see the approach tested on a wider variety of complex, real-world problems to better assess its practical utility and generalizability.
Conclusion
The "Divide-and-Conquer" program proposed in this paper represents a promising approach to enhancing the problem-solving abilities of large language models. By breaking down complex problems into more manageable sub-problems, the researchers demonstrate that LLMs can achieve better reasoning and more reliable solutions, particularly for intricate, multi-step tasks.
While the paper raises some interesting questions about the limitations and scalability of the D&C approach, the core idea of leveraging structured problem decomposition to guide language models is compelling and merits further exploration. As LLMs continue to advance, techniques like this that can improve their reasoning and problem-solving skills will be increasingly valuable for a wide range of practical applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
MathDivide: Improved mathematical reasoning by large language models
Saksham Sahai Srivastava, Ashutosh Gandhi
0
0
Large language models have been proven to be capable of handling complex linguistic and cognitive tasks. Therefore their usage has been extended to tasks requiring logical reasoning ability such as Mathematics. In this paper, we propose a prompting technique called MathDivide that breaks down the mathematical problem into simpler subproblems. Each of the subproblems is formulated as an algebraic expression whose value is evaluated by the Python code generated by the LLM for the corresponding algebraic expression. The values fed to the Python code are the numerical values provided in the problem statement. The solutions for the subproblems are composed together to obtain the final answer for the problem statement. Finally, the final answer is compared to the correct answer. If the final answer matches the correct answer, it is produced as output else a refinement prompt is fed to the LLM. We experiment with this prompting technique on both closed-source LLM models and open-source LLM models using GSM8K dataset. The results obtained demonstrate that MathDivide was able to significantly outperform the leading prompting technique called Math-prompter.
5/24/2024
Towards Detecting LLMs Hallucination via Markov Chain-based Multi-agent Debate Framework
Xiaoxi Sun, Jinpeng Li, Yan Zhong, Dongyan Zhao, Rui Yan
0
0
The advent of large language models (LLMs) has facilitated the development of natural language text generation. It also poses unprecedented challenges, with content hallucination emerging as a significant concern. Existing solutions often involve expensive and complex interventions during the training process. Moreover, some approaches emphasize problem disassembly while neglecting the crucial validation process, leading to performance degradation or limited applications. To overcome these limitations, we propose a Markov Chain-based multi-agent debate verification framework to enhance hallucination detection accuracy in concise claims. Our method integrates the fact-checking process, including claim detection, evidence retrieval, and multi-agent verification. In the verification stage, we deploy multiple agents through flexible Markov Chain-based debates to validate individual claims, ensuring meticulous verification outcomes. Experimental results across three generative tasks demonstrate that our approach achieves significant improvements over baselines.
6/6/2024
Don't Believe Everything You Read: Enhancing Summarization Interpretability through Automatic Identification of Hallucinations in Large Language Models
Priyesh Vakharia, Devavrat Joshi, Meenal Chavan, Dhananjay Sonawane, Bhrigu Garg, Parsa Mazaheri
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) are adept at text manipulation -- tasks such as machine translation and text summarization. However, these models can also be prone to hallucination, which can be detrimental to the faithfulness of any answers that the model provides. Recent works in combating hallucinations in LLMs deal with identifying hallucinated sentences and categorizing the different ways in which models hallucinate. This paper takes a deep dive into LLM behavior with respect to hallucinations, defines a token-level approach to identifying different kinds of hallucinations, and further utilizes this token-level tagging to improve the interpretability and faithfulness of LLMs in dialogue summarization tasks. Through this, the paper presents a new, enhanced dataset and a new training paradigm.
4/4/2024
MedThink: Inducing Medical Large-scale Visual Language Models to Hallucinate Less by Thinking More
Yue Jiang, Jiawei Chen, Dingkang Yang, Mingcheng Li, Shunli Wang, Tong Wu, Ke Li, Lihua Zhang
0
0
When Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) are applied to multimodal medical generative tasks, they suffer from significant model hallucination issues. This severely impairs the model's generative accuracy, making it challenging for LVLMs to be implemented in real-world medical scenarios to assist doctors in diagnosis. Enhancing the training data for downstream medical generative tasks is an effective way to address model hallucination. Moreover, the limited availability of training data in the medical field and privacy concerns greatly hinder the model's accuracy and generalization capabilities. In this paper, we introduce a method that mimics human cognitive processes to construct fine-grained instruction pairs and apply the concept of chain-of-thought (CoT) from inference scenarios to training scenarios, thereby proposing a method called MedThink. Our experiments on various LVLMs demonstrate that our novel data construction method tailored for the medical domain significantly improves the model's performance in medical image report generation tasks and substantially mitigates the hallucinations. All resources of this work will be released soon.
6/19/2024