Prototype-based Interpretable Breast Cancer Prediction Models: Analysis and Challenges

Read original: arXiv:2403.20260 - Published 7/22/2024 by Shreyasi Pathak, Jorg Schlotterer, Jeroen Veltman, Jeroen Geerdink, Maurice van Keulen, Christin Seifert
Total Score

0

šŸ”®

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Introduction

Related Work

Preliminaries

Prototype Evaluation Framework

Experimental Setup

Results and Discussion

Conclusion and Future Work



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on š• ā†’

Related Papers

šŸ”®

Total Score

0

Prototype-based Interpretable Breast Cancer Prediction Models: Analysis and Challenges

Shreyasi Pathak, Jorg Schlotterer, Jeroen Veltman, Jeroen Geerdink, Maurice van Keulen, Christin Seifert

Deep learning models have achieved high performance in medical applications, however, their adoption in clinical practice is hindered due to their black-box nature. Self-explainable models, like prototype-based models, can be especially beneficial as they are interpretable by design. However, if the learnt prototypes are of low quality then the prototype-based models are as good as black-box. Having high quality prototypes is a pre-requisite for a truly interpretable model. In this work, we propose a prototype evaluation framework for coherence (PEF-C) for quantitatively evaluating the quality of the prototypes based on domain knowledge. We show the use of PEF-C in the context of breast cancer prediction using mammography. Existing works on prototype-based models on breast cancer prediction using mammography have focused on improving the classification performance of prototype-based models compared to black-box models and have evaluated prototype quality through anecdotal evidence. We are the first to go beyond anecdotal evidence and evaluate the quality of the mammography prototypes systematically using our PEF-C. Specifically, we apply three state-of-the-art prototype-based models, ProtoPNet, BRAIxProtoPNet++ and PIP-Net on mammography images for breast cancer prediction and evaluate these models w.r.t. i) classification performance, and ii) quality of the prototypes, on three public datasets. Our results show that prototype-based models are competitive with black-box models in terms of classification performance, and achieve a higher score in detecting ROIs. However, the quality of the prototypes are not yet sufficient and can be improved in aspects of relevance, purity and learning a variety of prototypes. We call the XAI community to systematically evaluate the quality of the prototypes to check their true usability in high stake decisions and improve such models further.

Read more

7/22/2024

This Looks Better than That: Better Interpretable Models with ProtoPNeXt
Total Score

0

This Looks Better than That: Better Interpretable Models with ProtoPNeXt

Frank Willard, Luke Moffett, Emmanuel Mokel, Jon Donnelly, Stark Guo, Julia Yang, Giyoung Kim, Alina Jade Barnett, Cynthia Rudin

Prototypical-part models are a popular interpretable alternative to black-box deep learning models for computer vision. However, they are difficult to train, with high sensitivity to hyperparameter tuning, inhibiting their application to new datasets and our understanding of which methods truly improve their performance. To facilitate the careful study of prototypical-part networks (ProtoPNets), we create a new framework for integrating components of prototypical-part models -- ProtoPNeXt. Using ProtoPNeXt, we show that applying Bayesian hyperparameter tuning and an angular prototype similarity metric to the original ProtoPNet is sufficient to produce new state-of-the-art accuracy for prototypical-part models on CUB-200 across multiple backbones. We further deploy this framework to jointly optimize for accuracy and prototype interpretability as measured by metrics included in ProtoPNeXt. Using the same resources, this produces models with substantially superior semantics and changes in accuracy between +1.3% and -1.5%. The code and trained models will be made publicly available upon publication.

Read more

6/24/2024

Evaluating the Explainability of Attributes and Prototypes for a Medical Classification Model
Total Score

0

Evaluating the Explainability of Attributes and Prototypes for a Medical Classification Model

Luisa Gall'ee, Catharina Silvia Lisson, Christoph Gerhard Lisson, Daniela Drees, Felix Weig, Daniel Vogele, Meinrad Beer, Michael Gotz

Due to the sensitive nature of medicine, it is particularly important and highly demanded that AI methods are explainable. This need has been recognised and there is great research interest in xAI solutions with medical applications. However, there is a lack of user-centred evaluation regarding the actual impact of the explanations. We evaluate attribute- and prototype-based explanations with the Proto-Caps model. This xAI model reasons the target classification with human-defined visual features of the target object in the form of scores and attribute-specific prototypes. The model thus provides a multimodal explanation that is intuitively understandable to humans thanks to predefined attributes. A user study involving six radiologists shows that the explanations are subjectivly perceived as helpful, as they reflect their decision-making process. The results of the model are considered a second opinion that radiologists can discuss using the model's explanations. However, it was shown that the inclusion and increased magnitude of model explanations objectively can increase confidence in the model's predictions when the model is incorrect. We can conclude that attribute scores and visual prototypes enhance confidence in the model. However, additional development and repeated user studies are needed to tailor the explanation to the respective use case.

Read more

4/16/2024

This actually looks like that: Proto-BagNets for local and global interpretability-by-design
Total Score

0

This actually looks like that: Proto-BagNets for local and global interpretability-by-design

Kerol Djoumessi, Bubacarr Bah, Laura Kuhlewein, Philipp Berens, Lisa Koch

Interpretability is a key requirement for the use of machine learning models in high-stakes applications, including medical diagnosis. Explaining black-box models mostly relies on post-hoc methods that do not faithfully reflect the model's behavior. As a remedy, prototype-based networks have been proposed, but their interpretability is limited as they have been shown to provide coarse, unreliable, and imprecise explanations. In this work, we introduce Proto-BagNets, an interpretable-by-design prototype-based model that combines the advantages of bag-of-local feature models and prototype learning to provide meaningful, coherent, and relevant prototypical parts needed for accurate and interpretable image classification tasks. We evaluated the Proto-BagNet for drusen detection on publicly available retinal OCT data. The Proto-BagNet performed comparably to the state-of-the-art interpretable and non-interpretable models while providing faithful, accurate, and clinically meaningful local and global explanations. The code is available at https://github.com/kdjoumessi/Proto-BagNets.

Read more

6/26/2024