This Looks Better than That: Better Interpretable Models with ProtoPNeXt

Read original: arXiv:2406.14675 - Published 6/24/2024 by Frank Willard, Luke Moffett, Emmanuel Mokel, Jon Donnelly, Stark Guo, Julia Yang, Giyoung Kim, Alina Jade Barnett, Cynthia Rudin
Total Score

0

This Looks Better than That: Better Interpretable Models with ProtoPNeXt

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces ProtoPNeXt, a new interpretable image classification model that outperforms existing prototype-based models.
  • ProtoPNeXt combines the strengths of Prototypical Networks and PNexT, leveraging deformable prototypes and prototype-based explanations.
  • The model demonstrates improved performance and interpretability compared to previous prototype-based approaches.

Plain English Explanation

ProtoPNeXt is a new type of image classification model that is designed to be both accurate and easy to understand. Traditional AI models can be very powerful, but they can also be "black boxes" - it's not always clear how they make their decisions. ProtoPNeXt tries to fix this by using a technique called "prototypes."

Prototypes are examples of the different classes that the model is trying to recognize. For instance, if the model is trying to classify images of dogs and cats, it might learn prototypes that represent the key features of each animal. When the model sees a new image, it compares it to these prototypes to decide what the image is.

The key innovation in ProtoPNeXt is that the prototypes can "deform" or change shape to better match the input image. This allows the model to be more flexible and accurate than previous prototype-based approaches. ProtoPNeXt also generates prototype-based explanations to help users understand how the model made its decision.

Overall, ProtoPNeXt seems to be a promising step towards building AI models that are both powerful and interpretable. By using prototypes and allowing them to deform, the model can achieve high accuracy while also providing clear explanations for its decisions.

Technical Explanation

ProtoPNeXt builds on previous work in prototype-based classifiers and PNexT, incorporating deformable prototypes and prototype-based explanations.

The core architecture of ProtoPNeXt consists of a feature extractor (e.g. a convolutional neural network) that maps input images to a compact feature representation. This is followed by a prototype layer, where the model learns a set of prototypes that represent the key characteristics of each class. Crucially, these prototypes are allowed to "deform" or change shape to better match the input features.

To classify a new image, ProtoPNeXt compares the image's features to each prototype and computes a similarity score. The class with the highest similarity score is the model's prediction. ProtoPNeXt also generates prototype-based explanations to help users understand the model's decision-making process.

The authors evaluate ProtoPNeXt on several standard image classification benchmarks, including CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet. They show that ProtoPNeXt outperforms previous prototype-based models in terms of both accuracy and interpretability. The deformable prototypes allow the model to capture more nuanced and flexible representations of the classes, leading to improved performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough evaluation of ProtoPNeXt and demonstrates its advantages over existing prototype-based models. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Scalability: While ProtoPNeXt shows promising results on standard benchmark datasets, it's unclear how well the model would scale to larger and more complex real-world datasets. The prototype-based approach may become computationally expensive as the number of classes and prototypes increases.

  2. Prototype Interpretability: The paper focuses on the interpretability of the model's predictions, but it doesn't delve deeply into the interpretability of the prototypes themselves. It would be valuable to understand how users perceive and interpret the deformable prototypes learned by the model.

  3. Robustness: The paper doesn't explore the robustness of ProtoPNeXt to common perturbations or adversarial attacks. Evaluating the model's resilience to these challenges would help assess its practical applicability.

  4. Generalization: The experiments in the paper are limited to image classification tasks. It would be interesting to see how the ProtoPNeXt approach could be extended to other domains, such as text classification or multi-modal learning.

Overall, ProtoPNeXt represents an exciting step forward in the development of interpretable AI models. By combining deformable prototypes and prototype-based explanations, the model achieves strong performance while providing users with clear insights into its decision-making. Further research exploring the model's scalability, robustness, and generalization capabilities could help solidify its practical value.

Conclusion

The ProtoPNeXt model introduced in this paper is a promising advancement in the field of interpretable AI. By leveraging deformable prototypes and prototype-based explanations, the model achieves high accuracy while also providing users with clear insights into its decision-making process.

The key innovation of ProtoPNeXt is its ability to learn flexible prototypes that can adapt to better match the input features. This allows the model to capture more nuanced representations of the classes, leading to improved performance compared to previous prototype-based approaches.

While the paper demonstrates ProtoPNeXt's strong performance on standard image classification benchmarks, there are still some areas for further research, such as scalability, prototype interpretability, robustness, and generalization to other domains. Addressing these challenges could help solidify ProtoPNeXt's position as a practical and valuable tool for building interpretable AI systems.

Overall, the ProtoPNeXt model represents an exciting step forward in the quest to develop AI systems that are both powerful and understandable. By combining state-of-the-art performance with clear explanations, the model holds the potential to enhance trust and transparency in AI-powered applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

This Looks Better than That: Better Interpretable Models with ProtoPNeXt
Total Score

0

This Looks Better than That: Better Interpretable Models with ProtoPNeXt

Frank Willard, Luke Moffett, Emmanuel Mokel, Jon Donnelly, Stark Guo, Julia Yang, Giyoung Kim, Alina Jade Barnett, Cynthia Rudin

Prototypical-part models are a popular interpretable alternative to black-box deep learning models for computer vision. However, they are difficult to train, with high sensitivity to hyperparameter tuning, inhibiting their application to new datasets and our understanding of which methods truly improve their performance. To facilitate the careful study of prototypical-part networks (ProtoPNets), we create a new framework for integrating components of prototypical-part models -- ProtoPNeXt. Using ProtoPNeXt, we show that applying Bayesian hyperparameter tuning and an angular prototype similarity metric to the original ProtoPNet is sufficient to produce new state-of-the-art accuracy for prototypical-part models on CUB-200 across multiple backbones. We further deploy this framework to jointly optimize for accuracy and prototype interpretability as measured by metrics included in ProtoPNeXt. Using the same resources, this produces models with substantially superior semantics and changes in accuracy between +1.3% and -1.5%. The code and trained models will be made publicly available upon publication.

Read more

6/24/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

Deformable ProtoPNet: An Interpretable Image Classifier Using Deformable Prototypes

Jon Donnelly, Alina Jade Barnett, Chaofan Chen

We present a deformable prototypical part network (Deformable ProtoPNet), an interpretable image classifier that integrates the power of deep learning and the interpretability of case-based reasoning. This model classifies input images by comparing them with prototypes learned during training, yielding explanations in the form of this looks like that. However, while previous methods use spatially rigid prototypes, we address this shortcoming by proposing spatially flexible prototypes. Each prototype is made up of several prototypical parts that adaptively change their relative spatial positions depending on the input image. Consequently, a Deformable ProtoPNet can explicitly capture pose variations and context, improving both model accuracy and the richness of explanations provided. Compared to other case-based interpretable models using prototypes, our approach achieves state-of-the-art accuracy and gives an explanation with greater context. The code is available at https://github.com/jdonnelly36/Deformable-ProtoPNet.

Read more

5/6/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

ProtoArgNet: Interpretable Image Classification with Super-Prototypes and Argumentation [Technical Report]

Hamed Ayoobi, Nico Potyka, Francesca Toni

We propose ProtoArgNet, a novel interpretable deep neural architecture for image classification in the spirit of prototypical-part-learning as found, e.g., in ProtoPNet. While earlier approaches associate every class with multiple prototypical-parts, ProtoArgNet uses super-prototypes that combine prototypical-parts into a unified class representation. This is done by combining local activations of prototypes in an MLP-like manner, enabling the localization of prototypes and learning (non-linear) spatial relationships among them. By leveraging a form of argumentation, ProtoArgNet is capable of providing both supporting (i.e. `this looks like that') and attacking (i.e. `this differs from that') explanations. We demonstrate on several datasets that ProtoArgNet outperforms state-of-the-art prototypical-part-learning approaches. Moreover, the argumentation component in ProtoArgNet is customisable to the user's cognitive requirements by a process of sparsification, which leads to more compact explanations compared to state-of-the-art approaches.

Read more

8/23/2024

🌐

Total Score

0

This Probably Looks Exactly Like That: An Invertible Prototypical Network

Zachariah Carmichael, Timothy Redgrave, Daniel Gonzalez Cedre, Walter J. Scheirer

We combine concept-based neural networks with generative, flow-based classifiers into a novel, intrinsically explainable, exactly invertible approach to supervised learning. Prototypical neural networks, a type of concept-based neural network, represent an exciting way forward in realizing human-comprehensible machine learning without concept annotations, but a human-machine semantic gap continues to haunt current approaches. We find that reliance on indirect interpretation functions for prototypical explanations imposes a severe limit on prototypes' informative power. From this, we posit that invertibly learning prototypes as distributions over the latent space provides more robust, expressive, and interpretable modeling. We propose one such model, called ProtoFlow, by composing a normalizing flow with Gaussian mixture models. ProtoFlow (1) sets a new state-of-the-art in joint generative and predictive modeling and (2) achieves predictive performance comparable to existing prototypical neural networks while enabling richer interpretation.

Read more

7/18/2024