Provable Privacy with Non-Private Pre-Processing
2403.13041
0
0
Abstract
When analysing Differentially Private (DP) machine learning pipelines, the potential privacy cost of data-dependent pre-processing is frequently overlooked in privacy accounting. In this work, we propose a general framework to evaluate the additional privacy cost incurred by non-private data-dependent pre-processing algorithms. Our framework establishes upper bounds on the overall privacy guarantees by utilising two new technical notions: a variant of DP termed Smooth DP and the bounded sensitivity of the pre-processing algorithms. In addition to the generic framework, we provide explicit overall privacy guarantees for multiple data-dependent pre-processing algorithms, such as data imputation, quantization, deduplication and PCA, when used in combination with several DP algorithms. Notably, this framework is also simple to implement, allowing direct integration into existing DP pipelines.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a new approach to achieving provable privacy guarantees while using non-private pre-processing techniques.
- The key idea is to leverage a non-private preprocessing step to improve the efficiency and accuracy of a subsequent private data analysis.
- The authors demonstrate this approach in the context of synthetic data generation, showing that it can achieve strong privacy guarantees while outperforming previous methods.
Plain English Explanation
Protecting people's privacy when analyzing data is an important challenge. Differential privacy is a powerful technique that provides strong privacy guarantees, but it can sometimes be inefficient or lead to less accurate results.
This paper proposes a new way to achieve provable privacy by using a two-stage process. First, a non-private preprocessing step is used to transform the data in a way that improves efficiency and accuracy. Then, a private analysis is performed on the transformed data, ensuring strong privacy protections.
The authors demonstrate this approach in the context of generating synthetic data - creating new, artificial data that has similar statistical properties to the original data, but doesn't contain any sensitive information about individuals. They show that their method can outperform previous techniques for generating high-quality synthetic data while still providing rigorous privacy guarantees.
This work is significant because it shows how non-private preprocessing can be used to enhance the efficiency and utility of private data analysis, without compromising the overall privacy protections. It could have important implications for a variety of applications that require both privacy and high-quality data analysis.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new framework for achieving provable privacy guarantees called "Non-Private Pre-processing with Provable Privacy" (NP3). The key idea is to leverage a non-private preprocessing step to improve the efficiency and accuracy of a subsequent private data analysis.
Specifically, the authors propose a two-stage process:
-
Non-Private Preprocessing: In this stage, the data is transformed using techniques that do not provide any privacy guarantees, but can improve the efficiency and accuracy of the subsequent private analysis.
-
Private Analysis: In this stage, a private data analysis is performed on the transformed data, ensuring strong differential privacy guarantees.
The authors demonstrate this approach in the context of differentially private synthetic data generation. They propose a specific NP3 algorithm for this task, where the non-private preprocessing step involves learning a generative model of the data, and the private analysis step involves sampling from this model to generate new synthetic data.
Empirical results show that this NP3 approach can outperform previous methods for differentially private synthetic data generation, both in terms of utility (i.e., the quality of the synthetic data) and efficiency (i.e., the privacy budget consumed).
Critical Analysis
The key insight of this paper is that non-private preprocessing can be a useful tool for enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of private data analysis, without compromising the overall privacy guarantees. This is an important contribution, as it expands the toolbox available for building practical privacy-preserving data analysis systems.
That said, the paper does not address several important limitations and caveats:
-
Assumptions and Threat Model: The paper assumes a strong adversary who has access to the full dataset and the non-private preprocessing step. In practice, the threat model may be less severe, and weaker non-private preprocessing techniques may be sufficient.
-
Generalization and Applicability: While the authors demonstrate their approach in the context of synthetic data generation, it's unclear how well it would generalize to other private data analysis tasks. More research is needed to understand the broader applicability of this framework.
-
Interpretability and Explainability: The non-private preprocessing step involves training a generative model, which can be a "black box" that is difficult to interpret. This could be a concern in applications where transparency and explainability are important.
-
Rigorous Theoretical Analysis: The paper provides empirical evidence of the benefits of NP3, but a more rigorous theoretical analysis of its privacy and utility guarantees would be valuable.
Despite these limitations, this paper represents an important step forward in the quest to balance privacy and utility in data analysis. The NP3 framework is a promising approach that merits further investigation and development.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new framework called "Non-Private Pre-processing with Provable Privacy" (NP3) that leverages non-private preprocessing techniques to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of private data analysis, without compromising the overall privacy guarantees.
The key idea is to perform a non-private preprocessing step to transform the data in a way that improves the subsequent private analysis, and then apply a private analysis algorithm to the transformed data. The authors demonstrate this approach in the context of differentially private synthetic data generation, showing that it can outperform previous methods.
While the paper has some limitations and caveats, it represents an important contribution to the field of privacy-preserving data analysis. The NP3 framework expands the toolbox available for building practical, high-utility privacy-preserving systems, and could have significant implications for a wide range of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Noise-Aware Differentially Private Regression via Meta-Learning
Ossi Raisa, Stratis Markou, Matthew Ashman, Wessel P. Bruinsma, Marlon Tobaben, Antti Honkela, Richard E. Turner
0
0
Many high-stakes applications require machine learning models that protect user privacy and provide well-calibrated, accurate predictions. While Differential Privacy (DP) is the gold standard for protecting user privacy, standard DP mechanisms typically significantly impair performance. One approach to mitigating this issue is pre-training models on simulated data before DP learning on the private data. In this work we go a step further, using simulated data to train a meta-learning model that combines the Convolutional Conditional Neural Process (ConvCNP) with an improved functional DP mechanism of Hall et al. [2013] yielding the DPConvCNP. DPConvCNP learns from simulated data how to map private data to a DP predictive model in one forward pass, and then provides accurate, well-calibrated predictions. We compare DPConvCNP with a DP Gaussian Process (GP) baseline with carefully tuned hyperparameters. The DPConvCNP outperforms the GP baseline, especially on non-Gaussian data, yet is much faster at test time and requires less tuning.
6/14/2024
Shifted Interpolation for Differential Privacy
Jinho Bok, Weijie Su, Jason M. Altschuler
0
0
Noisy gradient descent and its variants are the predominant algorithms for differentially private machine learning. It is a fundamental question to quantify their privacy leakage, yet tight characterizations remain open even in the foundational setting of convex losses. This paper improves over previous analyses by establishing (and refining) the privacy amplification by iteration phenomenon in the unifying framework of $f$-differential privacy--which tightly captures all aspects of the privacy loss and immediately implies tighter privacy accounting in other notions of differential privacy, e.g., $(varepsilon,delta)$-DP and R'enyi DP. Our key technical insight is the construction of shifted interpolated processes that unravel the popular shifted-divergences argument, enabling generalizations beyond divergence-based relaxations of DP. Notably, this leads to the first exact privacy analysis in the foundational setting of strongly convex optimization. Our techniques extend to many settings: convex/strongly convex, constrained/unconstrained, full/cyclic/stochastic batches, and all combinations thereof. As an immediate corollary, we recover the $f$-DP characterization of the exponential mechanism for strongly convex optimization in Gopi et al. (2022), and moreover extend this result to more general settings.
6/13/2024
Too Good to be True? Turn Any Model Differentially Private With DP-Weights
David Zagardo
0
0
Imagine training a machine learning model with Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD), only to discover post-training that the noise level was either too high, crippling your model's utility, or too low, compromising privacy. The dreaded realization hits: you must start the lengthy training process from scratch. But what if you could avoid this retraining nightmare? In this study, we introduce a groundbreaking approach (to our knowledge) that applies differential privacy noise to the model's weights after training. We offer a comprehensive mathematical proof for this novel approach's privacy bounds, use formal methods to validate its privacy guarantees, and empirically evaluate its effectiveness using membership inference attacks and performance evaluations. This method allows for a single training run, followed by post-hoc noise adjustments to achieve optimal privacy-utility trade-offs. We compare this novel fine-tuned model (DP-Weights model) to a traditional DP-SGD model, demonstrating that our approach yields statistically similar performance and privacy guarantees. Our results validate the efficacy of post-training noise application, promising significant time savings and flexibility in fine-tuning differential privacy parameters, making it a practical alternative for deploying differentially private models in real-world scenarios.
7/1/2024
🔄
Beyond the Mean: Differentially Private Prototypes for Private Transfer Learning
Dariush Wahdany, Matthew Jagielski, Adam Dziedzic, Franziska Boenisch
0
0
Machine learning (ML) models have been shown to leak private information from their training datasets. Differential Privacy (DP), typically implemented through the differential private stochastic gradient descent algorithm (DP-SGD), has become the standard solution to bound leakage from the models. Despite recent improvements, DP-SGD-based approaches for private learning still usually struggle in the high privacy ($varepsilonle1)$ and low data regimes, and when the private training datasets are imbalanced. To overcome these limitations, we propose Differentially Private Prototype Learning (DPPL) as a new paradigm for private transfer learning. DPPL leverages publicly pre-trained encoders to extract features from private data and generates DP prototypes that represent each private class in the embedding space and can be publicly released for inference. Since our DP prototypes can be obtained from only a few private training data points and without iterative noise addition, they offer high-utility predictions and strong privacy guarantees even under the notion of pure DP. We additionally show that privacy-utility trade-offs can be further improved when leveraging the public data beyond pre-training of the encoder: in particular, we can privately sample our DP prototypes from the publicly available data points used to train the encoder. Our experimental evaluation with four state-of-the-art encoders, four vision datasets, and under different data and imbalancedness regimes demonstrate DPPL's high performance under strong privacy guarantees in challenging private learning setups.
6/13/2024