QT-TDM: Planning with Transformer Dynamics Model and Autoregressive Q-Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a novel planning framework called QT-TDM that combines a Transformer-based dynamics model and autoregressive Q-learning.
- Demonstrates the effectiveness of QT-TDM on a range of continuous control tasks.
- Outperforms existing model-based and model-free reinforcement learning algorithms.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new approach for planning and decision-making called QT-TDM (Transformer Dynamics Model and Autoregressive Q-Learning). The key idea is to combine two powerful machine learning techniques - Transformer models and autoregressive Q-learning - to tackle complex sequential decision-making problems.
The Transformer dynamics model learns to predict future states of the environment based on the current state and a sequence of actions. This allows the system to imagine the consequences of different action sequences and plan accordingly. The autoregressive Q-learning component then learns to efficiently select the best sequence of actions to maximize the expected reward.
The authors demonstrate that QT-TDM outperforms existing model-based and model-free reinforcement learning algorithms on a variety of continuous control tasks, such as simulated robotics and Atari game playing. This suggests that the combination of powerful modeling and planning capabilities can lead to more effective and robust decision-making systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces QT-TDM, a novel planning framework that integrates a Transformer-based dynamics model and an autoregressive Q-learning algorithm. The Transformer dynamics model learns to predict future states of the environment given the current state and a sequence of actions. This allows the system to imagine the consequences of different action sequences and plan accordingly.
The autoregressive Q-learning component then learns to efficiently select the best sequence of actions to maximize the expected reward. This is achieved by training the Q-function to predict the Q-values of action sequences in an autoregressive manner, where each action is conditioned on the previous actions in the sequence.
The authors evaluate QT-TDM on a range of continuous control tasks, including simulated robotics and Atari game playing. The results demonstrate that QT-TDM outperforms existing model-based and model-free reinforcement learning algorithms, such as model-based planning with learned dynamics models and behavior cloning with autoregressive Q-learning.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a promising approach for combining powerful modeling and planning capabilities to tackle complex sequential decision-making problems. The use of Transformer-based dynamics models and autoregressive Q-learning is a novel and well-motivated combination, leveraging the strengths of each component.
However, the paper does not address several potential limitations and areas for further research. For example, the authors do not discuss the computational complexity and training efficiency of the proposed framework, which could be a concern for real-world applications. Additionally, the evaluation is limited to simulated environments, and it would be valuable to see how QT-TDM performs on more realistic and diverse tasks.
Furthermore, the paper could benefit from a more in-depth discussion of the potential failure modes and limitations of the QT-TDM approach. It would be helpful to understand the scenarios where the framework might struggle and how it could be further improved or extended to address these challenges.
Conclusion
The QT-TDM framework represents an exciting advancement in the field of sequential decision-making, combining powerful modeling and planning capabilities to outperform existing reinforcement learning approaches. The integration of Transformer-based dynamics models and autoregressive Q-learning is a promising direction that could lead to more effective and robust decision-making systems.
While the paper provides convincing experimental results, further research is needed to address the potential limitations and expand the practical applicability of the QT-TDM approach. Nonetheless, this work contributes to the growing body of research on integrating model-based and model-free techniques for improved planning and control.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
QT-TDM: Planning with Transformer Dynamics Model and Autoregressive Q-Learning
Mostafa Kotb, Cornelius Weber, Muhammad Burhan Hafez, Stefan Wermter
Inspired by the success of the Transformer architecture in natural language processing and computer vision, we investigate the use of Transformers in Reinforcement Learning (RL), specifically in modeling the environment's dynamics using Transformer Dynamics Models (TDMs). We evaluate the capabilities of TDMs for continuous control in real-time planning scenarios with Model Predictive Control (MPC). While Transformers excel in long-horizon prediction, their tokenization mechanism and autoregressive nature lead to costly planning over long horizons, especially as the environment's dimensionality increases. To alleviate this issue, we use a TDM for short-term planning, and learn an autoregressive discrete Q-function using a separate Q-Transformer (QT) model to estimate a long-term return beyond the short-horizon planning. Our proposed method, QT-TDM, integrates the robust predictive capabilities of Transformers as dynamics models with the efficacy of a model-free Q-Transformer to mitigate the computational burden associated with real-time planning. Experiments in diverse state-based continuous control tasks show that QT-TDM is superior in performance and sample efficiency compared to existing Transformer-based RL models while achieving fast and computationally efficient inference.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Planning Transformer: Long-Horizon Offline Reinforcement Learning with Planning Tokens
Joseph Clinton, Robert Lieck
Supervised learning approaches to offline reinforcement learning, particularly those utilizing the Decision Transformer, have shown effectiveness in continuous environments and for sparse rewards. However, they often struggle with long-horizon tasks due to the high compounding error of auto-regressive models. To overcome this limitation, we go beyond next-token prediction and introduce Planning Tokens, which contain high-level, long time-scale information about the agent's future. Predicting dual time-scale tokens at regular intervals enables our model to use these long-horizon Planning Tokens as a form of implicit planning to guide its low-level policy and reduce compounding error. This architectural modification significantly enhances performance on long-horizon tasks, establishing a new state-of-the-art in complex D4RL environments. Additionally, we demonstrate that Planning Tokens improve the interpretability of the model's policy through the interpretable plan visualisations and attention map.
Read more9/17/2024
0
Q-value Regularized Transformer for Offline Reinforcement Learning
Shengchao Hu, Ziqing Fan, Chaoqin Huang, Li Shen, Ya Zhang, Yanfeng Wang, Dacheng Tao
Recent advancements in offline reinforcement learning (RL) have underscored the capabilities of Conditional Sequence Modeling (CSM), a paradigm that learns the action distribution based on history trajectory and target returns for each state. However, these methods often struggle with stitching together optimal trajectories from sub-optimal ones due to the inconsistency between the sampled returns within individual trajectories and the optimal returns across multiple trajectories. Fortunately, Dynamic Programming (DP) methods offer a solution by leveraging a value function to approximate optimal future returns for each state, while these techniques are prone to unstable learning behaviors, particularly in long-horizon and sparse-reward scenarios. Building upon these insights, we propose the Q-value regularized Transformer (QT), which combines the trajectory modeling ability of the Transformer with the predictability of optimal future returns from DP methods. QT learns an action-value function and integrates a term maximizing action-values into the training loss of CSM, which aims to seek optimal actions that align closely with the behavior policy. Empirical evaluations on D4RL benchmark datasets demonstrate the superiority of QT over traditional DP and CSM methods, highlighting the potential of QT to enhance the state-of-the-art in offline RL.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Decision Mamba: Reinforcement Learning via Hybrid Selective Sequence Modeling
Sili Huang, Jifeng Hu, Zhejian Yang, Liwei Yang, Tao Luo, Hechang Chen, Lichao Sun, Bo Yang
Recent works have shown the remarkable superiority of transformer models in reinforcement learning (RL), where the decision-making problem is formulated as sequential generation. Transformer-based agents could emerge with self-improvement in online environments by providing task contexts, such as multiple trajectories, called in-context RL. However, due to the quadratic computation complexity of attention in transformers, current in-context RL methods suffer from huge computational costs as the task horizon increases. In contrast, the Mamba model is renowned for its efficient ability to process long-term dependencies, which provides an opportunity for in-context RL to solve tasks that require long-term memory. To this end, we first implement Decision Mamba (DM) by replacing the backbone of Decision Transformer (DT). Then, we propose a Decision Mamba-Hybrid (DM-H) with the merits of transformers and Mamba in high-quality prediction and long-term memory. Specifically, DM-H first generates high-value sub-goals from long-term memory through the Mamba model. Then, we use sub-goals to prompt the transformer, establishing high-quality predictions. Experimental results demonstrate that DM-H achieves state-of-the-art in long and short-term tasks, such as D4RL, Grid World, and Tmaze benchmarks. Regarding efficiency, the online testing of DM-H in the long-term task is 28$times$ times faster than the transformer-based baselines.
Read more6/4/2024