Quality-Aware Translation Models: Efficient Generation and Quality Estimation in a Single Model

Overview

• Neural machine translation (NMT) models typically use Maximum-a-posteriori (MAP) decoding, which assumes the model's probability score correlates with human judgment of translation quality
• Research has shown this assumption doesn't always hold, and decoding strategies like Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) or quality-aware decoding can improve generation quality
• These approaches require an additional model to calculate a utility function during decoding, which is computationally expensive
• This paper proposes making NMT models themselves "quality-aware" by training them to estimate the quality of their own output

Plain English Explanation

Neural machine translation (NMT) models are used to translate text from one language to another. The most common way to decode these models, called Maximum-a-posteriori (MAP) decoding, assumes that the model's probability scores reflect how good the translation is according to humans.

However, research has shown this assumption is not always true. Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) decoding and quality-aware decoding can sometimes produce better translations by optimizing for a specific metric or quality signal.

The downside of these approaches is they require an extra model to calculate the translation quality, which makes the process much slower.

In this paper, the researchers propose a new way to make NMT models "quality-aware" during training. This allows them to estimate the quality of their own output, which can then be used for faster decoding strategies like MBR or improving MAP decoding. This can provide quality gains similar to complex reranking approaches, but with the efficiency of a single pass through the model.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes training NMT models to directly estimate the quality of their own output during training. This "quality-aware" capability is then leveraged during decoding to improve translation quality.

Specifically, the researchers add a quality estimation module to the NMT model's architecture. This module predicts a quality score for each target token the model generates. The quality scores are then used to guide the decoding process, either through Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) decoding or by directly modifying the Maximum-a-posteriori (MAP) decoding objective.

For MBR decoding, the quality scores allow the model to dramatically reduce the size of the candidate list, resulting in a 100x speedup compared to standard MBR approaches. For MAP decoding, the quality-aware objective leads to quality improvements on par with complex reranking methods, but with the efficiency of a single pass through the model.

The researchers evaluate their approach on several language pairs and find consistent improvements in translation quality, as measured by standard metrics like BLEU and human evaluation.

Critical Analysis

The key innovation of this work is training NMT models to be "quality-aware" by having them directly estimate the quality of their own output. This represents a significant departure from the standard MAP decoding approach, which assumes the model's probability scores correlate with human judgments of quality.

One potential limitation is that the quality estimation module adds additional complexity to the model and may require more training data to learn effectively. The authors note that further research is needed to fully understand the tradeoffs between model complexity, training data requirements, and decoding efficiency.

Additionally, the paper only evaluates the approach on standard machine translation benchmarks. It would be interesting to see how it performs on more open-ended or domain-specific translation tasks, where the mismatch between model probability and human quality judgments may be more pronounced.

Overall, this work presents a promising direction for improving the generation quality of NMT models by incorporating quality awareness directly into the model architecture and training process. Further research exploring the broader applicability and potential limitations of this approach would be valuable for advancing the state of the art in neural machine translation.

Conclusion

This paper proposes a novel approach to make neural machine translation (NMT) models "quality-aware" by training them to directly estimate the quality of their own output. This quality awareness can then be leveraged to improve decoding strategies like Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) or Maximum-a-posteriori (MAP) decoding.

The key benefits of this approach are increased decoding efficiency for MBR, and quality improvements for MAP decoding that are on par with complex reranking methods, but with the speed of a single pass through the model. This represents a significant advancement over standard decoding techniques that rely on the assumption of a correlation between model probability and human quality judgments.

While further research is needed to fully understand the tradeoffs and broader applicability of this quality-aware NMT approach, this work presents a promising direction for improving the generation quality and overall performance of neural machine translation systems.