QuaLLM: An LLM-based Framework to Extract Quantitative Insights from Online Forums
2405.05345
0
0
Abstract
Online discussion forums provide crucial data to understand the concerns of a wide range of real-world communities. However, the typical qualitative and quantitative methods used to analyze those data, such as thematic analysis and topic modeling, are infeasible to scale or require significant human effort to translate outputs to human readable forms. This study introduces QuaLLM, a novel LLM-based framework to analyze and extract quantitative insights from text data on online forums. The framework consists of a novel prompting methodology and evaluation strategy. We applied this framework to analyze over one million comments from two Reddit's rideshare worker communities, marking the largest study of its type. We uncover significant worker concerns regarding AI and algorithmic platform decisions, responding to regulatory calls about worker insights. In short, our work sets a new precedent for AI-assisted quantitative data analysis to surface concerns from online forums.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents QuaLLM, a framework that uses large language models (LLMs) to extract quantitative insights from online forum discussions.
- The framework aims to analyze user-generated content and derive numerical statistics, trends, and other quantitative information to support decision-making.
- The authors demonstrate the capabilities of QuaLLM on several real-world datasets, showcasing its ability to extract valuable insights from unstructured online conversations.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new framework called QuaLLM that uses advanced language AI models, known as large language models (LLMs), to analyze and extract numerical insights from online discussions on forums and other platforms. The key idea is to leverage the powerful natural language processing capabilities of LLMs to go beyond just summarizing the qualitative aspects of these conversations, and instead derive quantitative statistics, trends, and other numerical insights that can inform decision-making.
For example, the paper linked here demonstrates how LLMs can be used to uncover hidden arguments and perspectives in social media discussions. Similarly, this work explores how LLMs can augment human abilities in qualitative analysis. The QuaLLM framework aims to build on these advancements and apply them specifically to extracting quantitative insights from online forums and communities.
The authors showcase the capabilities of QuaLLM on several real-world datasets, showing how it can identify numerical trends, statistics, and other quantitative information that may not be immediately obvious from the raw text. This could be valuable for a range of applications, from understanding the public's views on vulnerability exploits to providing helpful and harmless advice to users.
Technical Explanation
The QuaLLM framework leverages the power of large language models (LLMs) to extract quantitative insights from online forum discussions. LLMs are a type of AI model that has been trained on vast amounts of text data, giving them the ability to understand and generate human-like language.
The key innovation of QuaLLM is in how it uses these LLMs to go beyond just summarizing the qualitative content of online discussions. Instead, the framework applies various techniques to identify numerical entities, trends, and other quantitative information that may be present in the text. This includes:
-
Numerical Entity Extraction: QuaLLM uses named entity recognition and other techniques to identify numerical mentions in the text, such as counts, percentages, and other statistics.
-
Trend Analysis: The framework analyzes the temporal patterns of these numerical entities to detect trends, spikes, and other changes over time.
-
Aggregation and Summarization: QuaLLM aggregates the extracted numerical information and provides concise summaries and visualizations to communicate the key quantitative insights.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of QuaLLM on several real-world datasets, including online discussions about public views on vulnerability exploits, advice-seeking questions, and more. The results show that QuaLLM is capable of surfacing valuable numerical insights that would be challenging to extract manually from the unstructured text.
Critical Analysis
The QuaLLM framework represents an important step forward in leveraging the capabilities of large language models to extract quantitative insights from online discussions. By going beyond just qualitative analysis, the framework can uncover numerical trends, statistics, and other information that may not be immediately apparent to human readers.
However, it's important to note some potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
Accuracy and Reliability: The accuracy and reliability of the numerical information extracted by QuaLLM will depend on the performance of the underlying LLM and the robustness of the extraction techniques. Careful evaluation and validation will be necessary to ensure the trustworthiness of the insights.
-
Context and Interpretation: Numerical information can be easily misinterpreted without proper context. QuaLLM will need to incorporate mechanisms to provide relevant contextual information and guidance on the interpretation of the extracted insights.
-
Ethical Considerations: As with any system that analyzes user-generated content, there are important ethical considerations around privacy, consent, and the potential misuse of the insights. The authors should address these concerns and provide guidelines for the responsible deployment of QuaLLM.
-
Additional research on the synergy between LLMs and human experts could also be valuable in further enhancing the capabilities of QuaLLM and similar frameworks.
Overall, the QuaLLM framework represents an exciting development in the field of AI-powered analysis of online discussions. With continued research and careful consideration of the challenges, it has the potential to unlock valuable quantitative insights that can inform decision-making and drive meaningful impact.
Conclusion
The QuaLLM framework introduced in this paper demonstrates the potential of large language models to extract quantitative insights from online forum discussions. By going beyond just qualitative analysis, QuaLLM can identify numerical trends, statistics, and other valuable information that can inform decision-making in a variety of domains.
The authors have showcased the capabilities of QuaLLM on several real-world datasets, highlighting its ability to surface insights that may not be immediately obvious from the raw text. This work builds on recent advancements in the use of LLMs for qualitative analysis and opens up new possibilities for leveraging these powerful AI models to extract actionable quantitative information from user-generated content.
As the field of AI continues to evolve, frameworks like QuaLLM will become increasingly valuable in helping organizations and individuals make sense of the vast amounts of data generated online. With careful attention to accuracy, context, and ethical considerations, this technology can unlock valuable insights and drive meaningful impact.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📉
Automating Thematic Analysis: How LLMs Analyse Controversial Topics
Awais Hameed Khan, Hiruni Kegalle, Rhea D'Silva, Ned Watt, Daniel Whelan-Shamy, Lida Ghahremanlou, Liam Magee
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) are promising analytical tools. They can augment human epistemic, cognitive and reasoning abilities, and support 'sensemaking', making sense of a complex environment or subject by analysing large volumes of data with a sensitivity to context and nuance absent in earlier text processing systems. This paper presents a pilot experiment that explores how LLMs can support thematic analysis of controversial topics. We compare how human researchers and two LLMs GPT-4 and Llama 2 categorise excerpts from media coverage of the controversial Australian Robodebt scandal. Our findings highlight intriguing overlaps and variances in thematic categorisation between human and machine agents, and suggest where LLMs can be effective in supporting forms of discourse and thematic analysis. We argue LLMs should be used to augment, and not replace human interpretation, and we add further methodological insights and reflections to existing research on the application of automation to qualitative research methods. We also introduce a novel card-based design toolkit, for both researchers and practitioners to further interrogate LLMs as analytical tools.
5/14/2024
Uncovering Latent Arguments in Social Media Messaging by Employing LLMs-in-the-Loop Strategy
Tunazzina Islam, Dan Goldwasser
0
0
The widespread use of social media has led to a surge in popularity for automated methods of analyzing public opinion. Supervised methods are adept at text categorization, yet the dynamic nature of social media discussions poses a continual challenge for these techniques due to the constant shifting of the focus. On the other hand, traditional unsupervised methods for extracting themes from public discourse, such as topic modeling, often reveal overarching patterns that might not capture specific nuances. Consequently, a significant portion of research into social media discourse still depends on labor-intensive manual coding techniques and a human-in-the-loop approach, which are both time-consuming and costly. In this work, we study the problem of discovering arguments associated with a specific theme. We propose a generic LLMs-in-the-Loop strategy that leverages the advanced capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to extract latent arguments from social media messaging. To demonstrate our approach, we apply our framework to contentious topics. We use two publicly available datasets: (1) the climate campaigns dataset of 14k Facebook ads with 25 themes and (2) the COVID-19 vaccine campaigns dataset of 9k Facebook ads with 14 themes. Furthermore, we analyze demographic targeting and the adaptation of messaging based on real-world events.
4/17/2024
LLM Discussion: Enhancing the Creativity of Large Language Models via Discussion Framework and Role-Play
Li-Chun Lu, Shou-Jen Chen, Tsung-Min Pai, Chan-Hung Yu, Hung-yi Lee, Shao-Hua Sun
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have shown exceptional proficiency in natural language processing but often fall short of generating creative and original responses to open-ended questions. To enhance LLM creativity, our key insight is to emulate the human process of inducing collective creativity through engaging discussions with participants from diverse backgrounds and perspectives. To this end, we propose LLM Discussion, a three-phase discussion framework that facilitates vigorous and diverging idea exchanges and ensures convergence to creative answers. Moreover, we adopt a role-playing technique by assigning distinct roles to LLMs to combat the homogeneity of LLMs. We evaluate the efficacy of the proposed framework with the Alternative Uses Test, Similarities Test, Instances Test, and Scientific Creativity Test through both LLM evaluation and human study. Our proposed framework outperforms single-LLM approaches and existing multi-LLM frameworks across various creativity metrics.
5/21/2024
Underneath the Numbers: Quantitative and Qualitative Gender Fairness in LLMs for Depression Prediction
Micol Spitale, Jiaee Cheong, Hatice Gunes
0
0
Recent studies show bias in many machine learning models for depression detection, but bias in LLMs for this task remains unexplored. This work presents the first attempt to investigate the degree of gender bias present in existing LLMs (ChatGPT, LLaMA 2, and Bard) using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. From our quantitative evaluation, we found that ChatGPT performs the best across various performance metrics and LLaMA 2 outperforms other LLMs in terms of group fairness metrics. As qualitative fairness evaluation remains an open research question we propose several strategies (e.g., word count, thematic analysis) to investigate whether and how a qualitative evaluation can provide valuable insights for bias analysis beyond what is possible with quantitative evaluation. We found that ChatGPT consistently provides a more comprehensive, well-reasoned explanation for its prediction compared to LLaMA 2. We have also identified several themes adopted by LLMs to qualitatively evaluate gender fairness. We hope our results can be used as a stepping stone towards future attempts at improving qualitative evaluation of fairness for LLMs especially for high-stakes tasks such as depression detection.
6/17/2024