Membership Inference Attacks Against Time-Series Models

Read original: arXiv:2407.02870 - Published 7/4/2024 by Noam Koren, Abigail Goldsteen, Ariel Farkash, Guy Amit
Total Score

0

🤯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Analyzing time-series data, especially in the medical field, raises serious privacy concerns as sensitive health data is often used to train machine learning models.
  • Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) are a key method for evaluating the privacy risk of these models, but time-series prediction models have not been thoroughly studied in this context.
  • The paper explores existing MIA techniques on time-series models and introduces new features focused on the seasonality and trend components of the data.

Plain English Explanation

When healthcare organizations use patient data to train machine learning models for things like disease diagnosis and ongoing care, it raises serious privacy concerns. These models could potentially reveal sensitive information about the individuals whose data was used to create them.

Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) are a way to evaluate the privacy risk of these models. MIAs can determine whether a particular data point was used to train a model. However, most research on MIAs has focused on simpler models, not the types of time-series models often used in healthcare.

In this paper, the researchers explore how to apply MIA techniques to time-series prediction models. They introduce new ways to analyze the seasonal patterns and long-term trends in the data, which can help identify whether a person's data was used to train the model. This provides a better understanding of the privacy risks involved in using these types of models, especially in sensitive medical applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the application of Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) to time-series prediction models, which are commonly used in healthcare to analyze patient data over time. The researchers explore existing MIA techniques and introduce new features focused on the seasonality and trend components of the time-series data.

To estimate seasonality, the team uses a multivariate Fourier transform, which can identify periodic patterns in the data. They also approximate long-term trends using a low-degree polynomial. These new features are then applied to various types of time-series models, using real-world healthcare datasets.

The results show that incorporating these seasonality and trend-based features enhances the effectiveness of MIAs in determining whether a particular data point was used to train a given model. This provides deeper insights into the privacy risks associated with deploying time-series prediction models, especially in sensitive medical applications.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution by exploring MIA techniques in the context of time-series prediction models, which have not been thoroughly studied before. The introduction of seasonality and trend-based features is a novel approach that helps improve the understanding of privacy risks in medical data applications.

However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations. The experiments were conducted on a limited set of datasets, and the performance of the MIA techniques may vary depending on the specific characteristics of the time-series data and the predictive models used. Additionally, the paper does not address potential mitigation strategies or ways to improve the privacy-preserving properties of time-series prediction models.

Further research could explore the generalizability of the proposed techniques to a wider range of time-series data and model architectures. Investigating methods for enhancing the privacy of time-series models, such as differential privacy or adversarial training, could also be a valuable direction for future work.

Conclusion

This paper takes an important step in understanding the privacy risks associated with using time-series prediction models, particularly in sensitive medical domains. By introducing new features focused on seasonality and trends, the researchers have demonstrated how Membership Inference Attacks can be more effectively applied to these types of models, providing valuable insights for organizations developing and deploying such systems.

As the use of machine learning in healthcare continues to grow, ensuring the privacy and security of patient data is crucial. The findings of this paper contribute to a better understanding of the privacy challenges involved and underscore the need for ongoing research and development in securing medical data applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

Total Score

0

Membership Inference Attacks Against Time-Series Models

Noam Koren, Abigail Goldsteen, Ariel Farkash, Guy Amit

Analyzing time-series data that may contain personal information, particularly in the medical field, presents serious privacy concerns. Sensitive health data from patients is often used to train machine-learning models for diagnostics and ongoing care. Assessing the privacy risk of such models is crucial to making knowledgeable decisions on whether to use a model in production, share it with third parties, or deploy it in patients homes. Membership Inference Attacks (MIA) are a key method for this kind of evaluation, however time-series prediction models have not been thoroughly studied in this context. We explore existing MIA techniques on time-series models, and introduce new features, focusing on the seasonality and trend components of the data. Seasonality is estimated using a multivariate Fourier transform, and a low-degree polynomial is used to approximate trends. We applied these techniques to various types of time-series models, using datasets from the health domain. Our results demonstrate that these new features enhance the effectiveness of MIAs in identifying membership, improving the understanding of privacy risks in medical data applications.

Read more

7/4/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

Fundamental Limits of Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning Models

Eric Aubinais, Elisabeth Gassiat, Pablo Piantanida

Membership inference attacks (MIA) can reveal whether a particular data point was part of the training dataset, potentially exposing sensitive information about individuals. This article provides theoretical guarantees by exploring the fundamental statistical limitations associated with MIAs on machine learning models. More precisely, we first derive the statistical quantity that governs the effectiveness and success of such attacks. We then theoretically prove that in a non-linear regression setting with overfitting algorithms, attacks may have a high probability of success. Finally, we investigate several situations for which we provide bounds on this quantity of interest. Interestingly, our findings indicate that discretizing the data might enhance the algorithm's security. Specifically, it is demonstrated to be limited by a constant, which quantifies the diversity of the underlying data distribution. We illustrate those results through two simple simulations.

Read more

6/12/2024

Range Membership Inference Attacks
Total Score

0

Range Membership Inference Attacks

Jiashu Tao, Reza Shokri

Machine learning models can leak private information about their training data, but the standard methods to measure this risk, based on membership inference attacks (MIAs), have a major limitation. They only check if a given data point textit{exactly} matches a training point, neglecting the potential of similar or partially overlapping data revealing the same private information. To address this issue, we introduce the class of range membership inference attacks (RaMIAs), testing if the model was trained on any data in a specified range (defined based on the semantics of privacy). We formulate the RaMIAs game and design a principled statistical test for its complex hypotheses. We show that RaMIAs can capture privacy loss more accurately and comprehensively than MIAs on various types of data, such as tabular, image, and language. RaMIA paves the way for a more comprehensive and meaningful privacy auditing of machine learning algorithms.

Read more

8/12/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

New!Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models?

Michael Duan, Anshuman Suri, Niloofar Mireshghallah, Sewon Min, Weijia Shi, Luke Zettlemoyer, Yulia Tsvetkov, Yejin Choi, David Evans, Hannaneh Hajishirzi

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) attempt to predict whether a particular datapoint is a member of a target model's training data. Despite extensive research on traditional machine learning models, there has been limited work studying MIA on the pre-training data of large language models (LLMs). We perform a large-scale evaluation of MIAs over a suite of language models (LMs) trained on the Pile, ranging from 160M to 12B parameters. We find that MIAs barely outperform random guessing for most settings across varying LLM sizes and domains. Our further analyses reveal that this poor performance can be attributed to (1) the combination of a large dataset and few training iterations, and (2) an inherently fuzzy boundary between members and non-members. We identify specific settings where LLMs have been shown to be vulnerable to membership inference and show that the apparent success in such settings can be attributed to a distribution shift, such as when members and non-members are drawn from the seemingly identical domain but with different temporal ranges. We release our code and data as a unified benchmark package that includes all existing MIAs, supporting future work.

Read more

9/17/2024