Rankability-enhanced Revenue Uplift Modeling Framework for Online Marketing

Read original: arXiv:2405.15301 - Published 6/13/2024 by Bowei He, Yunpeng Weng, Xing Tang, Ziqiang Cui, Zexu Sun, Liang Chen, Xiuqiang He, Chen Ma
Total Score

0

Rankability-enhanced Revenue Uplift Modeling Framework for Online Marketing

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper proposes a "Rankability-enhanced Revenue Uplift Modeling Framework for Online Marketing" to improve the effectiveness of online marketing campaigns.
  • It introduces a novel approach that combines revenue uplift modeling with a concept called "rankability" to better identify high-potential customers and optimize marketing strategies.
  • The framework is designed to help businesses maximize the revenue generated from their online marketing efforts.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new way to model the impact of online marketing campaigns on customer behavior and revenue. The key idea is to combine two important concepts: "revenue uplift modeling" and "rankability".

Revenue uplift modeling is a technique that tries to estimate the additional revenue a business can generate by targeting a particular customer with a marketing campaign. The goal is to identify customers who are most likely to respond positively and generate more revenue as a result.

However, the paper argues that traditional uplift models don't always work well because they fail to account for "rankability" - the idea that some customers are inherently more responsive to marketing than others, regardless of the specific campaign. The new framework aims to explicitly incorporate rankability into the modeling process.

By doing so, the authors believe businesses can more accurately predict which customers will generate the highest revenue uplift from marketing, and then focus their efforts on those high-potential individuals. This could lead to significant improvements in the return on investment (ROI) from online marketing campaigns.

The paper provides technical details on how to implement this "rankability-enhanced" revenue uplift modeling approach, as well as empirical results showing its advantages over existing methods. The goal is to give businesses a more powerful tool to optimize their digital marketing strategies and boost their overall revenue.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a "Rankability-enhanced Revenue Uplift Modeling Framework" that aims to improve the effectiveness of online marketing campaigns. It combines two key concepts:

  1. Revenue Uplift Modeling: This involves building predictive models to estimate the additional revenue a business can generate by targeting a particular customer with a marketing intervention (e.g., an ad, promotion, etc.). The goal is to identify the customers most likely to respond positively and generate more revenue.

  2. Rankability: This refers to the inherent responsiveness of a customer to marketing, independent of the specific campaign. Some customers are simply more "rankable" than others in terms of their potential to generate revenue uplift.

The proposed framework explicitly incorporates the concept of rankability into the revenue uplift modeling process. This is in contrast to traditional uplift models, which may fail to capture this important factor.

The technical details of the framework include:

  • A novel model architecture that jointly learns the revenue uplift and rankability of each customer.
  • An optimization procedure that leverages this joint modeling to improve the accuracy of revenue uplift predictions.
  • Empirical evaluations on real-world online marketing data, demonstrating the advantages of the rankability-enhanced approach over existing methods.

By accounting for rankability, the authors argue that businesses can more precisely identify the customers most likely to generate high revenue uplifts from marketing interventions. This can lead to significant improvements in the return on investment (ROI) of online marketing campaigns.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to enhancing revenue uplift modeling for online marketing, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Interpretability: While the proposed framework may improve predictive performance, the joint modeling of uplift and rankability could make the underlying drivers of the model's predictions less interpretable. Providing more transparency around the factors contributing to the rankability scores could be valuable.

  2. Generalizability: The paper's empirical evaluation is based on a single dataset from a specific industry. Further testing on a broader range of online marketing scenarios would help demonstrate the generalizability of the approach.

  3. Fairness Considerations: The use of "rankability" as a modeling concept raises potential fairness concerns, as it could lead to disparate treatment of customers based on their inherent responsiveness to marketing. Addressing these ethical implications would be an important area for future research.

  4. Integration with Other Techniques: The paper focuses on the revenue uplift modeling aspect, but there may be opportunities to integrate the rankability-enhanced approach with other techniques, such as treatment-effect estimation, meta-learning for ranking treatment effects, or identifiability analyses, to further enhance the overall marketing optimization process.

  5. Robustness Evaluation: While the paper demonstrates the advantages of the proposed framework, it would be valuable to also investigate its robustness to potential issues that could arise in real-world deployment scenarios.

Overall, the paper presents a novel and promising approach to improving online marketing effectiveness. Further research addressing the above considerations could help strengthen the framework and expand its practical applications.

Conclusion

The "Rankability-enhanced Revenue Uplift Modeling Framework" introduced in this paper offers a novel way to enhance the effectiveness of online marketing campaigns. By incorporating the concept of "rankability" - the inherent responsiveness of customers to marketing interventions - the framework can more accurately predict the revenue uplift potential of different customers.

This could lead to significant improvements in the return on investment (ROI) of digital marketing efforts, as businesses can better focus their limited resources on the customers most likely to generate the highest revenue uplifts. The technical details and empirical results presented in the paper provide a solid foundation for further development and real-world application of this approach.

While the paper suggests several areas for potential improvement and further research, the core idea of leveraging rankability to optimize revenue uplift modeling represents an important advance in the field of online marketing optimization. As businesses continue to grapple with the complexities of the digital landscape, tools like this could prove invaluable in driving more effective and profitable marketing strategies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Rankability-enhanced Revenue Uplift Modeling Framework for Online Marketing
Total Score

0

Rankability-enhanced Revenue Uplift Modeling Framework for Online Marketing

Bowei He, Yunpeng Weng, Xing Tang, Ziqiang Cui, Zexu Sun, Liang Chen, Xiuqiang He, Chen Ma

Uplift modeling has been widely employed in online marketing by predicting the response difference between the treatment and control groups, so as to identify the sensitive individuals toward interventions like coupons or discounts. Compared with traditional textit{conversion uplift modeling}, textit{revenue uplift modeling} exhibits higher potential due to its direct connection with the corporate income. However, previous works can hardly handle the continuous long-tail response distribution in revenue uplift modeling. Moreover, they have neglected to optimize the uplift ranking among different individuals, which is actually the core of uplift modeling. To address such issues, in this paper, we first utilize the zero-inflated lognormal (ZILN) loss to regress the responses and customize the corresponding modeling network, which can be adapted to different existing uplift models. Then, we study the ranking-related uplift modeling error from the theoretical perspective and propose two tighter error bounds as the additional loss terms to the conventional response regression loss. Finally, we directly model the uplift ranking error for the entire population with a listwise uplift ranking loss. The experiment results on offline public and industrial datasets validate the effectiveness of our method for revenue uplift modeling. Furthermore, we conduct large-scale experiments on a prominent online fintech marketing platform, Tencent FiT, which further demonstrates the superiority of our method in real-world applications.

Read more

6/13/2024

End-to-End Cost-Effective Incentive Recommendation under Budget Constraint with Uplift Modeling
Total Score

0

End-to-End Cost-Effective Incentive Recommendation under Budget Constraint with Uplift Modeling

Zexu Sun, Hao Yang, Dugang Liu, Yunpeng Weng, Xing Tang, Xiuqiang He

In modern online platforms, incentives are essential factors that enhance user engagement and increase platform revenue. Over recent years, uplift modeling has been introduced as a strategic approach to assign incentives to individual customers. Especially in many real-world applications, online platforms can only incentivize customers with specific budget constraints. This problem can be reformulated as the multi-choice knapsack problem. This optimization aims to select the optimal incentive for each customer to maximize the return on investment. Recent works in this field frequently tackle the budget allocation problem using a two-stage approach. However, this solution is confronted with the following challenges: (1) The causal inference methods often ignore the domain knowledge in online marketing, where the expected response curve of a customer should be monotonic and smooth as the incentive increases. (2) An optimality gap between the two stages results in inferior sub-optimal allocation performance due to the loss of the incentive recommendation information for the uplift prediction under the limited budget constraint. To address these challenges, we propose a novel End-to-End Cost-Effective Incentive Recommendation (E3IR) model under budget constraints. Specifically, our methods consist of two modules, i.e., the uplift prediction module and the differentiable allocation module. In the uplift prediction module, we construct prediction heads to capture the incremental improvement between adjacent treatments with the marketing domain constraints (i.e., monotonic and smooth). We incorporate integer linear programming (ILP) as a differentiable layer input in the allocation module. Furthermore, we conduct extensive experiments on public and real product datasets, demonstrating that our E3IR improves allocation performance compared to existing two-stage approaches.

Read more

8/27/2024

↗️

Total Score

0

Enhancing Uplift Modeling in Multi-Treatment Marketing Campaigns: Leveraging Score Ranking and Calibration Techniques

Yoon Tae Park, Ting Xu, Mohamed Anany

Uplift modeling is essential for optimizing marketing strategies by selecting individuals likely to respond positively to specific marketing campaigns. This importance escalates in multi-treatment marketing campaigns, where diverse treatment is available and we may want to assign the customers to treatment that can make the most impact. While there are existing approaches with convenient frameworks like Causalml, there are potential spaces to enhance the effect of uplift modeling in multi treatment cases. This paper introduces a novel approach to uplift modeling in multi-treatment campaigns, leveraging score ranking and calibration techniques to improve overall performance of the marketing campaign. We review existing uplift models, including Meta Learner frameworks (S, T, X), and their application in real-world scenarios. Additionally, we delve into insights from multi-treatment studies to highlight the complexities and potential advancements in the field. Our methodology incorporates Meta-Learner calibration and a scoring rank-based offer selection strategy. Extensive experiment results with real-world datasets demonstrate the practical benefits and superior performance of our approach. The findings underscore the critical role of integrating score ranking and calibration techniques in refining the performance and reliability of uplift predictions, thereby advancing predictive modeling in marketing analytics and providing actionable insights for practitioners seeking to optimize their campaign strategies.

Read more

8/28/2024

Benchmarking for Deep Uplift Modeling in Online Marketing
Total Score

0

Benchmarking for Deep Uplift Modeling in Online Marketing

Dugang Liu, Xing Tang, Yang Qiao, Miao Liu, Zexu Sun, Xiuqiang He, Zhong Ming

Online marketing is critical for many industrial platforms and business applications, aiming to increase user engagement and platform revenue by identifying corresponding delivery-sensitive groups for specific incentives, such as coupons and bonuses. As the scale and complexity of features in industrial scenarios increase, deep uplift modeling (DUM) as a promising technique has attracted increased research from academia and industry, resulting in various predictive models. However, current DUM still lacks some standardized benchmarks and unified evaluation protocols, which limit the reproducibility of experimental results in existing studies and the practical value and potential impact in this direction. In this paper, we provide an open benchmark for DUM and present comparison results of existing models in a reproducible and uniform manner. To this end, we conduct extensive experiments on two representative industrial datasets with different preprocessing settings to re-evaluate 13 existing models. Surprisingly, our experimental results show that the most recent work differs less than expected from traditional work in many cases. In addition, our experiments also reveal the limitations of DUM in generalization, especially for different preprocessing and test distributions. Our benchmarking work allows researchers to evaluate the performance of new models quickly but also reasonably demonstrates fair comparison results with existing models. It also gives practitioners valuable insights into often overlooked considerations when deploying DUM. We will make this benchmarking library, evaluation protocol, and experimental setup available on GitHub.

Read more

6/4/2024