Recursive PAC-Bayes: A Frequentist Approach to Sequential Prior Updates with No Information Loss
2405.14681
0
0
📶
Abstract
PAC-Bayesian analysis is a frequentist framework for incorporating prior knowledge into learning. It was inspired by Bayesian learning, which allows sequential data processing and naturally turns posteriors from one processing step into priors for the next. However, despite two and a half decades of research, the ability to update priors sequentially without losing confidence information along the way remained elusive for PAC-Bayes. While PAC-Bayes allows construction of data-informed priors, the final confidence intervals depend only on the number of points that were not used for the construction of the prior, whereas confidence information in the prior, which is related to the number of points used to construct the prior, is lost. This limits the possibility and benefit of sequential prior updates, because the final bounds depend only on the size of the final batch. We present a novel and, in retrospect, surprisingly simple and powerful PAC-Bayesian procedure that allows sequential prior updates with no information loss. The procedure is based on a novel decomposition of the expected loss of randomized classifiers. The decomposition rewrites the loss of the posterior as an excess loss relative to a downscaled loss of the prior plus the downscaled loss of the prior, which is bounded recursively. As a side result, we also present a generalization of the split-kl and PAC-Bayes-split-kl inequalities to discrete random variables, which we use for bounding the excess losses, and which can be of independent interest. In empirical evaluation the new procedure significantly outperforms state-of-the-art.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- PAC-Bayesian analysis is a statistical framework that allows incorporating prior knowledge into machine learning models.
- While PAC-Bayesian methods can construct data-informed priors, they struggle to update these priors sequentially without losing confidence information.
- This paper presents a novel PAC-Bayesian procedure that enables sequential prior updates without any loss of confidence information.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a statistical technique called PAC-Bayesian analysis that helps machine learning models make use of prior knowledge. This is similar to how Bayesian methods allow data to be processed sequentially, with the posterior from one step becoming the prior for the next.
However, traditional PAC-Bayesian approaches have a limitation - while they can construct priors based on data, the final confidence intervals they provide only depend on the number of data points that weren't used to build the prior. The confidence information contained in the prior itself (which is related to the number of points used to construct it) is lost.
This paper introduces a new PAC-Bayesian procedure that solves this problem. It uses a novel way of decomposing the expected loss of randomized classifiers, which allows sequential prior updates without any loss of confidence information. As a bonus, the paper also presents a generalization of some related statistical inequalities that can be useful beyond this specific application.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this paper is a novel PAC-Bayesian procedure that enables sequential prior updates without losing confidence information. This is achieved through a novel decomposition of the expected loss of randomized classifiers.
Specifically, the decomposition rewrites the loss of the posterior as an "excess loss" relative to a downscaled loss of the prior, plus the downscaled loss of the prior itself. This downscaled prior loss is then bounded recursively, allowing sequential prior updates while preserving confidence information.
The paper also presents a generalization of the split-kl and PAC-Bayes-split-kl inequalities to discrete random variables. This result can be used to bound the excess losses mentioned above, and may be of independent interest.
In empirical evaluations, the new PAC-Bayesian procedure significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, demonstrating the benefits of its ability to update priors sequentially without losing confidence information.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and powerful PAC-Bayesian technique, but it's worth considering a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The paper focuses on the theoretical development and provides limited experimental validation. More extensive empirical testing across a range of domains and tasks would help demonstrate the practical benefits of the method.
-
The technique relies on a specific decomposition of the expected loss. While this decomposition is the key innovation, it may not generalize to all possible PAC-Bayesian settings. Exploring the broader applicability of the approach would be valuable.
-
The paper does not discuss the computational complexity of the new procedure compared to existing PAC-Bayesian methods. Understanding the trade-offs in terms of computational efficiency would be helpful for practitioners.
-
The generalization of the split-kl and PAC-Bayes-split-kl inequalities to discrete random variables is an interesting contribution, but its broader implications and applications could be explored further.
Overall, this paper presents a significant advance in PAC-Bayesian analysis by enabling sequential prior updates without losing confidence information. While there are some avenues for further research, the technique has the potential to substantially improve the practical application of PAC-Bayesian methods in machine learning.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel PAC-Bayesian procedure that allows sequential prior updates without losing confidence information. This is a significant advancement over traditional PAC-Bayesian approaches, which struggle to maintain confidence information when updating priors incrementally.
The key innovation is a novel decomposition of the expected loss of randomized classifiers, which enables the recursive bounding of the downscaled prior loss. This, in turn, allows for sequential prior updates while preserving confidence information.
The paper also presents a useful generalization of related statistical inequalities, which can be applied beyond the specific context of this work. While there are some areas for further research, this technique has the potential to greatly enhance the practical application of PAC-Bayesian methods in machine learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔄
More PAC-Bayes bounds: From bounded losses, to losses with general tail behaviors, to anytime validity
Borja Rodr'iguez-G'alvez, Ragnar Thobaben, Mikael Skoglund
0
0
In this paper, we present new high-probability PAC-Bayes bounds for different types of losses. Firstly, for losses with a bounded range, we recover a strengthened version of Catoni's bound that holds uniformly for all parameter values. This leads to new fast-rate and mixed-rate bounds that are interpretable and tighter than previous bounds in the literature. In particular, the fast-rate bound is equivalent to the Seeger--Langford bound. Secondly, for losses with more general tail behaviors, we introduce two new parameter-free bounds: a PAC-Bayes Chernoff analogue when the loss' cumulative generating function is bounded, and a bound when the loss' second moment is bounded. These two bounds are obtained using a new technique based on a discretization of the space of possible events for the ``in probability'' parameter optimization problem. This technique is both simpler and more general than previous approaches optimizing over a grid on the parameters' space. Finally, using a simple technique that is applicable to any existing bound, we extend all previous results to anytime-valid bounds.
6/5/2024
🔄
Uniform Generalization Bounds on Data-Dependent Hypothesis Sets via PAC-Bayesian Theory on Random Sets
Benjamin Dupuis, Paul Viallard, George Deligiannidis, Umut Simsekli
0
0
We propose data-dependent uniform generalization bounds by approaching the problem from a PAC-Bayesian perspective. We first apply the PAC-Bayesian framework on `random sets' in a rigorous way, where the training algorithm is assumed to output a data-dependent hypothesis set after observing the training data. This approach allows us to prove data-dependent bounds, which can be applicable in numerous contexts. To highlight the power of our approach, we consider two main applications. First, we propose a PAC-Bayesian formulation of the recently developed fractal-dimension-based generalization bounds. The derived results are shown to be tighter and they unify the existing results around one simple proof technique. Second, we prove uniform bounds over the trajectories of continuous Langevin dynamics and stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics. These results provide novel information about the generalization properties of noisy algorithms.
4/29/2024
PAC-Bayes Analysis for Recalibration in Classification
Masahiro Fujisawa, Futoshi Futami
0
0
Nonparametric estimation with binning is widely employed in the calibration error evaluation and the recalibration of machine learning models. Recently, theoretical analyses of the bias induced by this estimation approach have been actively pursued; however, the understanding of the generalization of the calibration error to unknown data remains limited. In addition, although many recalibration algorithms have been proposed, their generalization performance lacks theoretical guarantees. To address this problem, we conduct a generalization analysis of the calibration error under the probably approximately correct (PAC) Bayes framework. This approach enables us to derive a first optimizable upper bound for the generalization error in the calibration context. We then propose a generalization-aware recalibration algorithm based on our generalization theory. Numerical experiments show that our algorithm improves the Gaussian-process-based recalibration performance on various benchmark datasets and models.
6/11/2024
Bayesian vs. PAC-Bayesian Deep Neural Network Ensembles
Nick Hauptvogel, Christian Igel
0
0
Bayesian neural networks address epistemic uncertainty by learning a posterior distribution over model parameters. Sampling and weighting networks according to this posterior yields an ensemble model referred to as Bayes ensemble. Ensembles of neural networks (deep ensembles) can profit from the cancellation of errors effect: Errors by ensemble members may average out and the deep ensemble achieves better predictive performance than each individual network. We argue that neither the sampling nor the weighting in a Bayes ensemble are particularly well-suited for increasing generalization performance, as they do not support the cancellation of errors effect, which is evident in the limit from the Bernstein-von~Mises theorem for misspecified models. In contrast, a weighted average of models where the weights are optimized by minimizing a PAC-Bayesian generalization bound can improve generalization performance. This requires that the optimization takes correlations between models into account, which can be achieved by minimizing the tandem loss at the cost that hold-out data for estimating error correlations need to be available. The PAC-Bayesian weighting increases the robustness against correlated models and models with lower performance in an ensemble. This allows us to safely add several models from the same learning process to an ensemble, instead of using early-stopping for selecting a single weight configuration. Our study presents empirical results supporting these conceptual considerations on four different classification datasets. We show that state-of-the-art Bayes ensembles from the literature, despite being computationally demanding, do not improve over simple uniformly weighted deep ensembles and cannot match the performance of deep ensembles weighted by optimizing the tandem loss, which additionally come with non-vacuous generalization guarantees.
6/11/2024