More PAC-Bayes bounds: From bounded losses, to losses with general tail behaviors, to anytime validity
2306.12214
0
0
🔄
Abstract
In this paper, we present new high-probability PAC-Bayes bounds for different types of losses. Firstly, for losses with a bounded range, we recover a strengthened version of Catoni's bound that holds uniformly for all parameter values. This leads to new fast-rate and mixed-rate bounds that are interpretable and tighter than previous bounds in the literature. In particular, the fast-rate bound is equivalent to the Seeger--Langford bound. Secondly, for losses with more general tail behaviors, we introduce two new parameter-free bounds: a PAC-Bayes Chernoff analogue when the loss' cumulative generating function is bounded, and a bound when the loss' second moment is bounded. These two bounds are obtained using a new technique based on a discretization of the space of possible events for the ``in probability'' parameter optimization problem. This technique is both simpler and more general than previous approaches optimizing over a grid on the parameters' space. Finally, using a simple technique that is applicable to any existing bound, we extend all previous results to anytime-valid bounds.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents new PAC-Bayes bounds that extend previous results in several ways:
- From bounded losses to losses with general tail behaviors
- Anytime-valid PAC-Bayes bounds
- These bounds provide greater flexibility and tighter guarantees for machine learning models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a type of mathematical guarantee called PAC-Bayes bounds, which can be used to understand how well machine learning models will perform on new, unseen data. PAC-Bayes bounds provide a way to bound the expected performance (or "generalization error") of a model, based on its performance on the training data.
The key contributions of this paper are:
-
Extending PAC-Bayes bounds to losses with general tail behaviors: Previous PAC-Bayes bounds were limited to cases where the losses (i.e., the errors made by the model) were bounded. The paper shows how to extend these bounds to losses with more general statistical properties, which is important for many real-world machine learning problems.
-
Anytime-valid PAC-Bayes bounds: The paper also provides a new type of PAC-Bayes bound that holds not just for a fixed model, but for any model the researcher might choose, even after seeing the training data. This is useful in situations where a researcher wants to explore many different models and understand their generalization guarantees.
These improvements to PAC-Bayes bounds can lead to tighter and more flexible performance guarantees for machine learning models, which is important for building reliable and trustworthy AI systems. By understanding the limits of a model's performance, researchers and practitioners can make more informed decisions about model selection and deployment.
Technical Explanation
The paper extends previous work on PAC-Bayes bounds in two key ways:
-
Bounded losses to general tail behaviors: Previous PAC-Bayes bounds required the losses to be bounded, which is a strong assumption that does not hold for many real-world machine learning problems. The paper relaxes this assumption and provides PAC-Bayes bounds for losses with more general tail behaviors, such as sub-Gaussian or sub-exponential distributions.
-
Fixed models to anytime-valid bounds: Existing PAC-Bayes bounds only held for a fixed model chosen independently of the training data. The paper introduces a new type of PAC-Bayes bound that is "anytime-valid," meaning it holds for any model the researcher might choose, even after seeing the training data.
To achieve these results, the paper uses a combination of techniques, including PAC-Chernoff bounds and tools from information theory and probability theory. The authors also provide examples and numerical experiments to illustrate the tightness and practical relevance of their new PAC-Bayes bounds.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes significant technical contributions to the field of PAC-Bayes bounds, which are an important tool for understanding the generalization properties of machine learning models. The authors have carefully addressed limitations of previous work and expanded the applicability of PAC-Bayes bounds to more realistic settings.
One potential area for further research mentioned in the paper is the extension of these results to the case of parameter uncertainties and imperfect surrogate models, which is an important consideration in many real-world applications of machine learning.
Additionally, while the paper provides strong theoretical guarantees, it would be valuable to see more extensive empirical validation of the proposed bounds on a diverse set of machine learning tasks and datasets. This could help demonstrate the practical relevance and tightness of the bounds in realistic scenarios.
Overall, this paper represents a significant advancement in the state-of-the-art for PAC-Bayes bounds and provides a foundation for further research and applications in machine learning.
Conclusion
This paper presents new PAC-Bayes bounds that address important limitations of previous work. By extending the bounds to handle losses with general tail behaviors and providing anytime-valid guarantees, the authors have created a more flexible and powerful framework for understanding the generalization performance of machine learning models.
These improvements to PAC-Bayes bounds can have far-reaching implications for the development of reliable and trustworthy AI systems. By providing tighter and more realistic performance guarantees, the proposed bounds can help researchers and practitioners make better-informed decisions about model selection, deployment, and the overall trustworthiness of their machine learning applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔄
Uniform Generalization Bounds on Data-Dependent Hypothesis Sets via PAC-Bayesian Theory on Random Sets
Benjamin Dupuis, Paul Viallard, George Deligiannidis, Umut Simsekli
0
0
We propose data-dependent uniform generalization bounds by approaching the problem from a PAC-Bayesian perspective. We first apply the PAC-Bayesian framework on `random sets' in a rigorous way, where the training algorithm is assumed to output a data-dependent hypothesis set after observing the training data. This approach allows us to prove data-dependent bounds, which can be applicable in numerous contexts. To highlight the power of our approach, we consider two main applications. First, we propose a PAC-Bayesian formulation of the recently developed fractal-dimension-based generalization bounds. The derived results are shown to be tighter and they unify the existing results around one simple proof technique. Second, we prove uniform bounds over the trajectories of continuous Langevin dynamics and stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics. These results provide novel information about the generalization properties of noisy algorithms.
4/29/2024
🔄
Better-than-KL PAC-Bayes Bounds
Ilja Kuzborskij, Kwang-Sung Jun, Yulian Wu, Kyoungseok Jang, Francesco Orabona
0
0
Let $f(theta, X_1),$ $ dots,$ $ f(theta, X_n)$ be a sequence of random elements, where $f$ is a fixed scalar function, $X_1, dots, X_n$ are independent random variables (data), and $theta$ is a random parameter distributed according to some data-dependent posterior distribution $P_n$. In this paper, we consider the problem of proving concentration inequalities to estimate the mean of the sequence. An example of such a problem is the estimation of the generalization error of some predictor trained by a stochastic algorithm, such as a neural network where $f$ is a loss function. Classically, this problem is approached through a PAC-Bayes analysis where, in addition to the posterior, we choose a prior distribution which captures our belief about the inductive bias of the learning problem. Then, the key quantity in PAC-Bayes concentration bounds is a divergence that captures the complexity of the learning problem where the de facto standard choice is the KL divergence. However, the tightness of this choice has rarely been questioned. In this paper, we challenge the tightness of the KL-divergence-based bounds by showing that it is possible to achieve a strictly tighter bound. In particular, we demonstrate new high-probability PAC-Bayes bounds with a novel and better-than-KL divergence that is inspired by Zhang et al. (2022). Our proof is inspired by recent advances in regret analysis of gambling algorithms, and its use to derive concentration inequalities. Our result is first-of-its-kind in that existing PAC-Bayes bounds with non-KL divergences are not known to be strictly better than KL. Thus, we believe our work marks the first step towards identifying optimal rates of PAC-Bayes bounds.
4/5/2024
📶
Recursive PAC-Bayes: A Frequentist Approach to Sequential Prior Updates with No Information Loss
Yi-Shan Wu, Yijie Zhang, Badr-Eddine Ch'erief-Abdellatif, Yevgeny Seldin
0
0
PAC-Bayesian analysis is a frequentist framework for incorporating prior knowledge into learning. It was inspired by Bayesian learning, which allows sequential data processing and naturally turns posteriors from one processing step into priors for the next. However, despite two and a half decades of research, the ability to update priors sequentially without losing confidence information along the way remained elusive for PAC-Bayes. While PAC-Bayes allows construction of data-informed priors, the final confidence intervals depend only on the number of points that were not used for the construction of the prior, whereas confidence information in the prior, which is related to the number of points used to construct the prior, is lost. This limits the possibility and benefit of sequential prior updates, because the final bounds depend only on the size of the final batch. We present a novel and, in retrospect, surprisingly simple and powerful PAC-Bayesian procedure that allows sequential prior updates with no information loss. The procedure is based on a novel decomposition of the expected loss of randomized classifiers. The decomposition rewrites the loss of the posterior as an excess loss relative to a downscaled loss of the prior plus the downscaled loss of the prior, which is bounded recursively. As a side result, we also present a generalization of the split-kl and PAC-Bayes-split-kl inequalities to discrete random variables, which we use for bounding the excess losses, and which can be of independent interest. In empirical evaluation the new procedure significantly outperforms state-of-the-art.
5/24/2024
PAC-Chernoff Bounds: Understanding Generalization in the Interpolation Regime
Andr'es R. Masegosa, Luis A. Ortega
0
0
This paper introduces a distribution-dependent PAC-Chernoff bound that exhibits perfect tightness for interpolators, even within over-parameterized model classes. This bound, which relies on basic principles of Large Deviation Theory, defines a natural measure of the smoothness of a model, characterized by simple real-valued functions. Building upon this bound and the new concept of smoothness, we present an unified theoretical framework revealing why certain interpolators show an exceptional generalization, while others falter. We theoretically show how a wide spectrum of modern learning methodologies, encompassing techniques such as $ell_2$-norm, distance-from-initialization and input-gradient regularization, in combination with data augmentation, invariant architectures, and over-parameterization, collectively guide the optimizer toward smoother interpolators, which, according to our theoretical framework, are the ones exhibiting superior generalization performance. This study shows that distribution-dependent bounds serve as a powerful tool to understand the complex dynamics behind the generalization capabilities of over-parameterized interpolators.
4/30/2024