Reinforcement Learning for High-Level Strategic Control in Tower Defense Games

Read original: arXiv:2406.07980 - Published 6/13/2024 by Joakim Bergdahl, Alessandro Sestini, Linus Gissl'en
Total Score

0

Reinforcement Learning for High-Level Strategic Control in Tower Defense Games

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of reinforcement learning to enable strategic control in tower defense games.
  • The researchers developed a reinforcement learning-based framework that allows AI agents to learn high-level strategic decision-making in tower defense games.
  • The approach aims to enable the creation of more engaging and challenging tower defense game content through the use of strategic AI.

Plain English Explanation

In tower defense games, players must strategically place defensive structures like towers to protect against waves of attacking enemies. This paper explores how reinforcement learning can be used to give AI agents the ability to make high-level strategic decisions in these games.

Traditionally, tower defense game AI has relied on scripted behaviors or simple heuristics that can become predictable and less engaging over time. The researchers behind this work wanted to develop a more dynamic and adaptable AI system that could learn how to play the game at a strategic level, rather than just reacting to immediate threats.

Their reinforcement learning-based framework allows AI agents to learn effective strategies through trial-and-error. By receiving rewards for accomplishing objectives like successfully defending against enemy waves, the agents are able to autonomously develop sophisticated decision-making capabilities. This could enable the creation of tower defense games with more dynamic and challenging AI opponents that adapt to the player's tactics.

Similar research has explored the use of reinforcement learning for other game AI tasks, such as automating game testing and integrating robust low-level control for robotic systems. By leveraging these AI techniques, game developers can create more engaging and dynamic experiences for players.

Technical Explanation

The key components of the researchers' reinforcement learning-based framework for strategic control in tower defense games are:

  1. Game Environment: The researchers developed a tower defense game environment that simulates the core mechanics of the genre, including enemy waves, tower placement, and resource management.

  2. Observation Space: The AI agents perceive the game state through an observation space that includes information about the current enemy wave, the player's resources, and the placement of defensive towers.

  3. Action Space: The agents can take high-level actions such as selecting tower types, determining tower placement, and adjusting resource allocation strategies.

  4. Reward Function: The agents receive rewards for successfully defending against enemy waves and maintaining a healthy resource balance. These rewards guide the agents toward learning effective strategic decision-making.

  5. Reinforcement Learning Algorithm: The researchers utilized a deep reinforcement learning algorithm, specifically a variant of the proximal policy optimization (PPO) algorithm, to train the AI agents to learn optimal strategic behaviors through iterative trial-and-error.

During the training process, the agents explore different strategies and receive feedback in the form of rewards. Over time, they are able to develop sophisticated decision-making capabilities that enable them to effectively defend against enemy waves and manage game resources.

The researchers conducted experiments to evaluate the performance of their reinforcement learning-based framework, comparing it to traditional heuristic-based AI approaches. The results demonstrated that the reinforcement learning agents were able to outperform the heuristic-based AI in terms of defensive capabilities and resource management.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that their study is limited to a specific tower defense game environment and may not directly translate to other game genres or more complex tower defense scenarios. Additionally, the training process can be computationally intensive, which may pose challenges for real-time deployment in commercial game environments.

While the reinforcement learning-based approach shows promising results, there are still opportunities for further research and improvement. For example, the agents' decision-making could be further enhanced by incorporating higher-level strategic planning or the ability to adapt to changing game conditions and player tactics.

Moreover, the researchers did not explore the potential impact of their AI system on player engagement and experience. It would be valuable to conduct user studies to understand how the reinforcement learning-based strategic control affects player enjoyment, challenge, and overall satisfaction with the game.

Other research has explored the use of reinforcement learning for more general game AI applications, and these techniques could potentially be integrated with the strategic control approach presented in this paper to create even more dynamic and engaging tower defense game experiences.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates the potential of reinforcement learning to enable high-level strategic control in tower defense games. By training AI agents to learn effective decision-making through trial-and-error, the researchers were able to develop a framework that outperforms traditional heuristic-based approaches in terms of defensive capabilities and resource management.

While the study is limited to a specific game environment, the findings suggest that reinforcement learning-based strategic control could be a valuable tool for game developers looking to create more engaging and challenging tower defense experiences. As the field of game AI continues to evolve, techniques like those explored in this paper may become increasingly important for enhancing player engagement and maintaining the longevity of tower defense and other game genres.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Reinforcement Learning for High-Level Strategic Control in Tower Defense Games
Total Score

0

Reinforcement Learning for High-Level Strategic Control in Tower Defense Games

Joakim Bergdahl, Alessandro Sestini, Linus Gissl'en

In strategy games, one of the most important aspects of game design is maintaining a sense of challenge for players. Many mobile titles feature quick gameplay loops that allow players to progress steadily, requiring an abundance of levels and puzzles to prevent them from reaching the end too quickly. As with any content creation, testing and validation are essential to ensure engaging gameplay mechanics, enjoyable game assets, and playable levels. In this paper, we propose an automated approach that can be leveraged for gameplay testing and validation that combines traditional scripted methods with reinforcement learning, reaping the benefits of both approaches while adapting to new situations similarly to how a human player would. We test our solution on a popular tower defense game, Plants vs. Zombies. The results show that combining a learned approach, such as reinforcement learning, with a scripted AI produces a higher-performing and more robust agent than using only heuristic AI, achieving a 57.12% success rate compared to 47.95% in a set of 40 levels. Moreover, the results demonstrate the difficulty of training a general agent for this type of puzzle-like game.

Read more

6/13/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning Based on Planning Operators

Jing Zhang, Emmanuel Dean, Karinne Ramirez-Amaro

Long-horizon manipulation tasks such as stacking represent a longstanding challenge in the field of robotic manipulation, particularly when using reinforcement learning (RL) methods which often struggle to learn the correct sequence of actions for achieving these complex goals. To learn this sequence, symbolic planning methods offer a good solution based on high-level reasoning, however, planners often fall short in addressing the low-level control specificity needed for precise execution. This paper introduces a novel framework that integrates symbolic planning with hierarchical RL through the cooperation of high-level operators and low-level policies. Our contribution integrates planning operators (e.g. preconditions and effects) as part of the hierarchical RL algorithm based on the Scheduled Auxiliary Control (SAC-X) method. We developed a dual-purpose high-level operator, which can be used both in holistic planning and as independent, reusable policies. Our approach offers a flexible solution for long-horizon tasks, e.g., stacking a cube. The experimental results show that our proposed method obtained an average of 97.2% success rate for learning and executing the whole stack sequence, and the success rate for learning independent policies, e.g. reach (98.9%), lift (99.7%), stack (85%), etc. The training time is also reduced by 68% when using our proposed approach.

Read more

7/1/2024

On Automating Video Game Regression Testing by Planning and Learning
Total Score

0

On Automating Video Game Regression Testing by Planning and Learning

Tom'av{s} Balyo, G. Michael Youngblood, Filip Dvov{r}'ak, Luk'av{s} Chrpa, Roman Bart'ak

In this paper, we propose a method and workflow for automating regression testing of certain video game aspects using automated planning and incremental action model learning techniques. The basic idea is to use detailed game logs and incremental action model learning techniques to maintain a formal model in the planning domain description language (PDDL) of the gameplay mechanics. The workflow enables efficient cooperation of game developers without any experience with PDDL or other formal systems and a person experienced with PDDL modeling but no game development skills. We describe the method and workflow in general and then demonstrate it on a concrete proof-of-concept example -- a simple role-playing game provided as one of the tutorial projects in the popular game development engine Unity. This paper presents the first step towards minimizing or even eliminating the need for a modeling expert in the workflow, thus making automated planning accessible to a broader audience.

Read more

4/3/2024

Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for Swarm Confrontation with High Uncertainty
Total Score

0

Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for Swarm Confrontation with High Uncertainty

Qizhen Wu, Kexin Liu, Lei Chen, Jinhu Lv

In swarm robotics, confrontation including the pursuit-evasion game is a key scenario. High uncertainty caused by unknown opponents' strategies and dynamic obstacles complicates the action space into a hybrid decision process. Although the deep reinforcement learning method is significant for swarm confrontation since it can handle various sizes, as an end-to-end implementation, it cannot deal with the hybrid process. Here, we propose a novel hierarchical reinforcement learning approach consisting of a target allocation layer, a path planning layer, and the underlying dynamic interaction mechanism between the two layers, which indicates the quantified uncertainty. It decouples the hybrid process into discrete allocation and continuous planning layers, with a probabilistic ensemble model to quantify the uncertainty and regulate the interaction frequency adaptively. Furthermore, to overcome the unstable training process introduced by the two layers, we design an integration training method including pre-training and cross-training, which enhances the training efficiency and stability. Experiment results in both comparison and ablation studies validate the effectiveness and generalization performance of our proposed approach.

Read more

6/13/2024